- Joined
- Feb 28, 2016
- Messages
- 252
I agree such a shame Rooney is mediocre now and Mata is talented but not as talented as isco.If we didnt have Rooney and Mata, I think we would be in for him but definitely not now.
I agree such a shame Rooney is mediocre now and Mata is talented but not as talented as isco.If we didnt have Rooney and Mata, I think we would be in for him but definitely not now.
Would completely destroy Spurs' wage structure if they buy him, won't it?
Kane & Lloris must be their highest earners, with Eriksen & Vertonghen soon to follow surely.
Isco would command £150k+
Are those really the sort of wages that are under discussion? He was on about 2m Euros net pa(4m pre-tax) at Madrid, that's about £65k per week.
Bit of a strange one for Tottenham really, considering Alli and Eriksson both prefer the 10 position, that's definitely Isco's best too. I guess if they have a chance to sign a player like him though, you just do it and worry later.
He can get away with playing in a 3 man midfield as he works really hard, but not sure about playing him in a 2 man CM in the premier league, would be a bit risky. Then again Modric did it, so who knows?I cant see it happening but yes you are right - although I think Isco would be incredible playing in a deeper position also.
Oh, the irony.Why don't you feck off with constant snide remarks? It seems like mostly you just cast around looking for a fights.
Isco's the type of player that, if available, you make room for. He'd be so good here if he gets back to his best.
Oh, the irony.
I really don't think he is what we need right now.
Depends on how you look at it. Ideally, you'd go for a holding midfielder, but which one is available at this point in time?
Isco solves the Rooney problem and is able to play both in a midfield three with Pogba, or as a #10 in a 4231. Isco, Pogba and Schneidi/Carrick has mouth watering potential.
To me it looks weak defensively.
We need a box-to-box (Strootman/Gueye) and a holding midfielder (Weigl/Jorginho) to partner Pogba. Another #10 shouldn't be the priority, we already have Mkhitaryan and Mata who are this type.
Does fernandinho-de bruyne- silva look weak defensively? Or the midfield liverpool usually play? Or modric with kroos? Or Xabi Alonso, Thiago, Muller? Busquets, Iniesta, Rakitic? All big clubs tends to play with 1 holding mid and then 2 play maker types these days. One or them obviouslt doing more defensively, and Pogba can do that role perfectly. He just needs the right holding mid. Isco next to him in front of a holding mid would be right along those lines (though I think we should put Mkhitaryan right there and we would be fine).To me it looks weak defensively.
We need a box-to-box (Strootman/Gueye) and a holding midfielder (Weigl/Jorginho) to partner Pogba. Another #10 shouldn't be the priority, we already have Mkhitaryan and Mata who are this type.
Infact, given the strengths of our personnel, we should do away with the #10 position completely (unless Mkhi plays there), which makes Isco semi-redundant because apart from that, his position of relative specialty is as the 'Iniesta' in a midfield 3.
He's not a #10. He can play #10, but he's more of a #6/8 hybrid with enough instincts to handle #10. Closest thing to Iniesta. Mata, I believe, won't be here much longer (not that I agree with it, but that's another topic), while Mkhi is very good on the flanks as well.
Like I said, which holding midfielder will be available at this point in time? Weigl will cost a fortune and Napoli is always a pain to deal with. Mind you, I don't think Schneidi (and Carrick obvs) is the way to go, long term. However, those two should be enough to get United to at least a Top 3 finish this season and, more importantly, get Pogba away from the shackles of a CM 2.
Does fernandinho-de bruyne- silva look weak defensively? Or the midfield liverpool usually play? Or modric with kroos? Or Xabi Alonso, Thiago, Muller? Busquets, Iniesta, Rakitic? All big clubs tends to play with 1 holding mid and then 2 play maker types these days. One or them obviouslt doing more defensively, and Pogba can do that role perfectly. He just needs the right holding mid. Isco next to him in front of a holding mid would be right along those lines (though I think we should put Mkhitaryan right there and we would be fine).
I loved that Malaga team. Willy in net, Demichelis and Weligton at the back, Monreal/Antunes and Gamez as the full backs, Camacho and Toulalan sitting in midfield, Isco and Joaquin on the wings, occasionally Portillo and Duda playing, with Saviola/Cruz up top. I also liked Piazon when he came on loan from Chelsea. I was so disappointed when Dortmund got that last minute goal to knock them out.Err, not sure about this one. Quality player no doubt (and a personal favorite from his Malaga days)
He's what we need, pick up Neves while we at it. A midfield of Isco, Pogba and Neves would dramatically improve our team.
He's got City written all over him and who can blame him, can't imagine many choosing us over them at the moment.
Another luxury player.....yay!!!
How do you define a 'luxury player'? Because to me, this is a player who's sole contributions amount to flashy goals and assists. Isco is definitely not like such a player.
Isco isn't a pure No. 10.How does Isco fit in to a United midfield, exactly?
Excellent player, but in likelihood again means 4-2-3-1 and Pogba sitting deep.
"Luxury player" is one of the Cafe's shite inventions.How do you define a 'luxury player'? Because to me, this is a player who's sole contributions amount to flashy goals and assists. Isco is definitely not like such a player.
Isco's technical ability is incredible, alongside Pogba with a destroyer next to them and that midfield could become a force to be reckoned with. He has the speed and quick feet to get out of tight situations as well as being an immense dribbler and being able to play those defence unlocking passes. Whether or not his time on the bench has affected him though, I'm not so sure.