Is Gareth Southgate a shiite England manager?

Honestly some people are blinded by us playing well, which is largely down to the far superior calibre of players in our squad to the likes of Aaron Lennon, Heskey and Walcott starting on the 2010s.

But what's the point of having such a great team if you never try to put teams to the sword? These sorts of squads come by once every 30 years, our attacking talent in the squad is better than France given their injuries and yet we never fully utilise it. Southgate tries not lose, until we inevitably lose.
Our attacking talent is at best equal with France. They have the best player in the world on the left, that counts for a lot. They've got Grizemann knitting things together, and we don't necessarily have that guile. They have Dembele who is Saka's equal. I think Kane is our only major advantage and to be honest in international football Giroud is more successful. You sound a bit entitled to me. It was what it was, a 50/50 game. We were not superior on talent but we did put out a good performance.
 
Grealish on with a minute half left of extra time......

Any one defending this need their heads looked at :lol:
It felt almost cynical tbh. Rashford in scoring form and given scraps of time to do anything.

No final push in 2nd half is nothing new from his version of England.
 
He's shite but I have to admit, he set up the team quite well tonight, I guess the only thing you could fault him on is the unimaginative subs that he made and letting kane take the second pen(if it was his call to begin with).

But today aside, he should be replaced and there are some very capabilities managers out there.
Tuchel,Enrique and maybe even someone like klopp if their season goes to hell.
A) Kane had already scored one, why would you stop him taking a second?

B) none of those take the job, so again, who replaces him?
 
I think his influence is over exaggerated. Englands performance in major tournaments has happened at the same time as expansion to more teams. All 3 tournaments we have had easy groups. The only decent team he’s beaten in knockout football is Germany, but their recent world cups shows they aren’t the force they use to be. We are better but we could and maybe should have won a recent tournament.

His biggest weakness is changing games when things are going against the team. Never makes chances at the right time, never gives the team an extra 5% like Klopp or Pep. I know Mount won the pen but for me you bring in Rashford earlier. Foden was having a poor game. Grealish should have come on as well.

Na Foden played well, Henderson off for Rashford and sliding Foden into midfield would have been the ideal option down 1-0 and 2-1.
 
He must have a billion pounds worth of players to choose from this is the strongest England squad in history

Groups of players like this and chances to win a major tournament are very rare and it’s being completely wasted

He’s been a bit unlucky admittedly but we can’t keep taking home the nearly trophy after every tournament
 
Yeah but England did put France to the sword tonight, especially in the second half. I say that as someone appalled by some of Southgates earlier games especially the Italy one.

Tonight was 95% fine margins and 5% Sterling, knives definitely not out for southgate after this one though I'd probably feel more comfortable with a better coach in charge.

We did not put France to the sword, by the very definition of what that means. Grealish, Rashford, Maddison all on the bench to win this for us, instead they got like 5 minutes of game time. It's just a waste of a great squad.

Our attacking talent is at best equal with France. They have the best player in the world on the left, that counts for a lot. They've got Grizemann knitting things together, and we don't necessarily have that guile. They have Dembele who is Saka's equal. You sound a bit entitled to me. It was what it was, a 50/50 game. We were not superior on talent but we did put out a good performance.

Squad wise. Squad. Hence mentioning given their injuries. Their front 4 is as good as ours. But we have by the superior options on our bench.
 
Managing England is about more than managing the players. It's about managing the whole country, the expectation, the inevitable backlashes, the despicable but vocal racists when black players miss penalties, the media as desperate for a disaster as they are for success. And he's done OK. If you don't manage that the pressure on the players means that managing them is almost impossible. I like him. I'd hate him to manage United though.
 
So name names. I’m not seeing legitimate options anywhere.
I'm not the person being asked but to me it's obvious - Poch or Tuchel.

Tuchel is not allowed back in the country with no job, so he'd jump at the chance.

If it's about which British manager, then there's no one because the FA just waited too long and both Potter and Howe are gone (although Potter might be back on the market soon...)
 
2022 Nations League apart, England have been very decent overall under Southgate.
Let's not forget France are WC title holder, this tournament cannot be considered a failure imho.

He deserves to stay until next EURO and then I'd renew his contract only if he does really well in Germany
 
Neh can't criticise for late subs, we were well on top and nothing needed changing until France scored against run of play on 75. He then brings Mount on who wins a pen in about 2 mins.
 
Potter after it implodes for him at Chelsea.
Yeah probably, would he be much better than Southgate if he proves not good enough for Chelsea though? I’d probably say yeah but I wouldn’t be surprised if we had similar results just with slightly better football.
 
This England team just lack the mental fortitude to make it count when it matters. I think Southgate isn’t the most motivational manager to play under which may be an issue.
 
So name names. I’m not seeing legitimate options anywhere.

Not sure if realistic but poch and tuchel aren't even employed right now. As long as we can get past their nationalities.

Even brenton would do a better job IMO. At least he isn't a defensive cowardly manager.

Potter and Howe as well if we went with the top English managers in the game right now.

OGS as a darkhorse.
 
A hologram of Alf Ramsey would be all right. Is El Tel still alive and kicking? We could bring him back with Lineker as his number 2.
 
Neh can't criticise for late subs, we were well on top and nothing needed changing until France scored against run of play on 75. He then brings Mount on who wins a pen in about 2 mins.
We literally allowed them back into the game by not making changes to kill the game off when on top.
 
Would Solskjaer have done any worse? That's all you have to say about how good a manager he supposedly is.
 
Neh can't criticise for late subs, we were well on top and nothing needed changing until France scored against run of play on 75. He then brings Mount on who wins a pen in about 2 mins.

Mount got pushed in the back, he done feck all else. Grealish, Maddison and Rashford were all sat on the bench. He waited too late for the subs. Always reactive, never proactive.
 
Neh can't criticise for late subs, we were well on top and nothing needed changing until France scored against run of play on 75. He then brings Mount on who wins a pen in about 2 mins.
Completely disagree. You bring on Rashford soon after the Kane equaliser, you stretch France and you make them think twice about attacking.

You not only then have a chance of actually winning the damn game but also alleviate the pressure from the French attack. Not sure why this is not obvious to more of you when this same point won't go amiss in a United game
 
I've never liked him. He massively benefited from good draws in the first WC and having practically a home tournament - in which he massively fluffed the final

However I think he's got this WC spot on and tonight we largely bossed the best team in the world and went out down to a bad ref, a missed pen and rotten luck.

The players seem to like him and I can't see an obvious replacement so I doubt he'll be going anywhere soon
 
We did not put France to the sword, by the very definition of what that means. Grealish, Rashford, Maddison all on the bench to win this for us, instead they got like 5 minutes of game time. It's just a waste of a great squad.



Squad wise. Squad. Hence mentioning given their injuries. Their front 4 is as good as ours. But we have by the superior options on our bench.
We have decent bench options, not as good as you're making it sound. None of them are world beaters at this level. Not yet anyway. Why are they better than a Coman type player? I don't see it, they're just guys we're very familiar with because we're naturally inclined to talking about PL players. I don't think we had a major squad advantage over France, which is why the bookies saw it how they did.
 
2022 Nations League apart, England have been very decent overall under Southgate.
Let's not forget France are WC title holder, this tournament cannot be considered a failure imho.

He deserves to stay until next EURO and then I'd renew his contract only if he does really well in Germany

Decent because of a golden generation of attacking talent, the best we've had in long time where players like Sancho can't even get into the squad. And nothing to show for it. He is on a level to Santos and like Santos needs to go. Doesn't put on the good attackers to kill the game when we have the chance. Same story as with Italy. If this was England 2008 to 2016 squad, I can accept the results, he'll they'd be great. But with this squad? It's not great.
 
Yeah probably, would he be much better than Southgate if he proves not good enough for Chelsea though? I’d probably say yeah but I wouldn’t be surprised if we had similar results just with slightly better football.
I think we need to accept you don't need to be a great coach at this level. Potter or eddie howe would be fine choice.

Maybe a coach in the system already?
 
We did not put France to the sword, by the very definition of what that means. Grealish, Rashford, Maddison all on the bench to win this for us, instead they got like 5 minutes of game time. It's just a waste of a great squad.



Squad wise. Squad. Hence mentioning given their injuries. Their front 4 is as good as ours. But we have by the superior options on our bench.
I hate to do this to you as loads of idiots on here have done this to me. But that is a kind of FIFA game approach for such a high stakes high pressure game. No offence but it's kind of ridiculous.

But I definitely would have had grealish on earlier. And I would have liked to see Maddison get more game time over the tournament.