fergies coat
Full Member
Nobody has ever done it on foreign soil.A fella called Gareth something did it 4 years ago. Not sure what became of him after.
Nobody has ever done it on foreign soil.A fella called Gareth something did it 4 years ago. Not sure what became of him after.
Our attacking talent is at best equal with France. They have the best player in the world on the left, that counts for a lot. They've got Grizemann knitting things together, and we don't necessarily have that guile. They have Dembele who is Saka's equal. I think Kane is our only major advantage and to be honest in international football Giroud is more successful. You sound a bit entitled to me. It was what it was, a 50/50 game. We were not superior on talent but we did put out a good performance.Honestly some people are blinded by us playing well, which is largely down to the far superior calibre of players in our squad to the likes of Aaron Lennon, Heskey and Walcott starting on the 2010s.
But what's the point of having such a great team if you never try to put teams to the sword? These sorts of squads come by once every 30 years, our attacking talent in the squad is better than France given their injuries and yet we never fully utilise it. Southgate tries not lose, until we inevitably lose.
It felt almost cynical tbh. Rashford in scoring form and given scraps of time to do anything.Grealish on with a minute half left of extra time......
Any one defending this need their heads looked at
A) Kane had already scored one, why would you stop him taking a second?He's shite but I have to admit, he set up the team quite well tonight, I guess the only thing you could fault him on is the unimaginative subs that he made and letting kane take the second pen(if it was his call to begin with).
But today aside, he should be replaced and there are some very capabilities managers out there.
Tuchel,Enrique and maybe even someone like klopp if their season goes to hell.
Because he can play centrally and be better imo. He's a playmaker, playmakers are best utilised centrally. All his best play is when he comes inside.Why would we not play Foden in the position he plays 95% of the time for City?
So name names. I’m not seeing legitimate options anywhere.Anybody who has actually managed a top tier club/nation or won trophies.
When did England colonise Russia again?Nobody has ever done it on foreign soil.
I think his influence is over exaggerated. Englands performance in major tournaments has happened at the same time as expansion to more teams. All 3 tournaments we have had easy groups. The only decent team he’s beaten in knockout football is Germany, but their recent world cups shows they aren’t the force they use to be. We are better but we could and maybe should have won a recent tournament.
His biggest weakness is changing games when things are going against the team. Never makes chances at the right time, never gives the team an extra 5% like Klopp or Pep. I know Mount won the pen but for me you bring in Rashford earlier. Foden was having a poor game. Grealish should have come on as well.
Yeah but England did put France to the sword tonight, especially in the second half. I say that as someone appalled by some of Southgates earlier games especially the Italy one.
Tonight was 95% fine margins and 5% Sterling, knives definitely not out for southgate after this one though I'd probably feel more comfortable with a better coach in charge.
Our attacking talent is at best equal with France. They have the best player in the world on the left, that counts for a lot. They've got Grizemann knitting things together, and we don't necessarily have that guile. They have Dembele who is Saka's equal. You sound a bit entitled to me. It was what it was, a 50/50 game. We were not superior on talent but we did put out a good performance.
Please justify why you think this.Na Foden played well, Henderson off for Rashford and sliding Foden into midfield would have been the ideal option down 1-0 and 2-1.
In a 50/50 game we never win.When did England colonise Russia again?
Wait for potter get the sackWho would you replace him with?
I'm not the person being asked but to me it's obvious - Poch or Tuchel.So name names. I’m not seeing legitimate options anywhere.
Yeah probably, would he be much better than Southgate if he proves not good enough for Chelsea though? I’d probably say yeah but I wouldn’t be surprised if we had similar results just with slightly better football.Potter after it implodes for him at Chelsea.
Please justify why you think this.
So name names. I’m not seeing legitimate options anywhere.
We literally allowed them back into the game by not making changes to kill the game off when on top.Neh can't criticise for late subs, we were well on top and nothing needed changing until France scored against run of play on 75. He then brings Mount on who wins a pen in about 2 mins.
Nobody has ever done it on foreign soil.
Who should be in the conversation to replace him?
Neh can't criticise for late subs, we were well on top and nothing needed changing until France scored against run of play on 75. He then brings Mount on who wins a pen in about 2 mins.
Completely disagree. You bring on Rashford soon after the Kane equaliser, you stretch France and you make them think twice about attacking.Neh can't criticise for late subs, we were well on top and nothing needed changing until France scored against run of play on 75. He then brings Mount on who wins a pen in about 2 mins.
We have decent bench options, not as good as you're making it sound. None of them are world beaters at this level. Not yet anyway. Why are they better than a Coman type player? I don't see it, they're just guys we're very familiar with because we're naturally inclined to talking about PL players. I don't think we had a major squad advantage over France, which is why the bookies saw it how they did.We did not put France to the sword, by the very definition of what that means. Grealish, Rashford, Maddison all on the bench to win this for us, instead they got like 5 minutes of game time. It's just a waste of a great squad.
Squad wise. Squad. Hence mentioning given their injuries. Their front 4 is as good as ours. But we have by the superior options on our bench.
He completed 1/2 dribbles in 85 minutes.He was excellent on the ball, getting the team up the field with his ball control and dribbling. Provided more in that regard than the entire midfield.
2022 Nations League apart, England have been very decent overall under Southgate.
Let's not forget France are WC title holder, this tournament cannot be considered a failure imho.
He deserves to stay until next EURO and then I'd renew his contract only if he does really well in Germany
Obviously but that wasn't the question.So England didn't lose a semi final to Croatia in Russia 2018 or to Germany at Italia 90?
I think we need to accept you don't need to be a great coach at this level. Potter or eddie howe would be fine choice.Yeah probably, would he be much better than Southgate if he proves not good enough for Chelsea though? I’d probably say yeah but I wouldn’t be surprised if we had similar results just with slightly better football.
I hate to do this to you as loads of idiots on here have done this to me. But that is a kind of FIFA game approach for such a high stakes high pressure game. No offence but it's kind of ridiculous.We did not put France to the sword, by the very definition of what that means. Grealish, Rashford, Maddison all on the bench to win this for us, instead they got like 5 minutes of game time. It's just a waste of a great squad.
Squad wise. Squad. Hence mentioning given their injuries. Their front 4 is as good as ours. But we have by the superior options on our bench.
They had no problem appointing an ItalianTommy Tuchel.
I don't think the English FA have the balls to appoint a German though.
He simply doesn't take risks and in knockout football you either need to be a tactical mastermind or take some fecking risks