fergies coat
Full Member
When has any England manager ever done that?Exactly France aren’t great and have been crippled with injuries. A good manager gets England through to the semis reasonably comfortably.
When has any England manager ever done that?Exactly France aren’t great and have been crippled with injuries. A good manager gets England through to the semis reasonably comfortably.
Subs were awful
He was just as cowardly tonight.By being less cowardly and by having us playing better then before, we do have a better team and he actually has us playing well.
No one. He gets you out of the group and wins you 1-2 ko games. That is a good enough outcome to continue.
He was just as cowardly tonight.
He's improving by losing a stage earlier than in the previous World Cup. Now I've seen it allI would keep him in charge for the Euros.
I don't think we'll get a better replacement, and he is improving as a manager
Another day and we're in a semi final.
Not often we go out when we've been the better side.
I don't think he really tried to win the game or take charge of it when England got on top after the goal. Italy all over again.Nah, cowardly would be 3 at the back.
He also brought on, in theory, a more adventurous sub in Mount for Henderson.
We've been way more cowardly tonight in the past.
I have nothing against cs"s. To each his ownHomophobic insult but ok
They weren't really. Just people have to find reasons to microanalyse because of the result. Not a heck of a lot wrong with the setup, tactics, the way they dealt with Mbappe, the flow of the game all went fine for England. It's moments in a 50/50 game, or actually one France were favourites for that went against us.When? Tonight? If so, I'm talking about throughout the tournament.
Also, at the time it was 1-1, we were in the ascendancy and I believe Southgate didn't want to change that too much.
Could he have brought Rashford on before Sterling? Yes, but what other 'subs were awful'?
The Sterling sub was awful, but this really wasn't the Italy game. It's rare any manager ever makes 100% correct decisions (though I hold out hope for Erik!)When? Tonight? If so, I'm talking about throughout the tournament.
Also, at the time it was 1-1, we were in the ascendancy and I believe Southgate didn't want to change that too much.
Could he have brought Rashford on before Sterling? Yes, but what other 'subs were awful'?
He's improving by losing a stage earlier than in the previous World Cup. Now I've seen it all
Homophobic insult but ok
Déjà vu with Ole situation. Some just won't see it until we're getting battered left, right and centre.I would keep him in charge for the Euros.
I don't think we'll get a better replacement, and he is improving as a manager
Another day and we're in a semi final.
Not often we go out when we've been the better side.
I think the Sterling sub was the epitome of cowardly/safe. Totally wrong too.I've been a massive citric of Southgate... I thought we were pretty rubbish throughout the Euros despite winning. I don't think we were rubbish in this tournament though. Like @Berbaclass says it could just be down to the team being better, but I'm inclined to give Southgate some credit.
Yeah grow up mate.He's a fecking cock sucker, feck off Southgate, surprised he brought on Rashford so early.
Yeah but England did put France to the sword tonight, especially in the second half. I say that as someone appalled by some of Southgates earlier games especially the Italy one.Honestly some people are blinded by us playing well, which is largely down to the far superior calibre of players in our squad to the likes of Aaron Lennon, Heskey and Walcott starting on the 2010s.
But what's the point of having such a great team if you never try to put teams to the sword? These sorts of squads come by once every 30 uears years, our attacking talent in the squad is on par with France and yet we never fully utilise it. Southgate tries not lose, until we inevitably lose.
It's all about the team. International football is about timing and taking your chance when all your effort over a generation, or even two, gets rewarded with a golden generation or at least one capable of winning the major prizes which are contested so, so rarely in football.I've been a massive citric of Southgate... I thought we were pretty rubbish throughout the Euros despite winning. I don't think we were rubbish in this tournament though. Like @Berbaclass says it could just be down to the team being better, but I'm inclined to give Southgate some credit.
I think the Sterling sub was the epitome of cowardly/safe. Totally wrong too.
Nothing wrong with admitting he's taken them as far as he can and recognising his limitations as a coach. I'd respect him if he resigned.He has to go, simply because his cycle has ended this evening… he is going to resign at the presser.
Why would we not play Foden in the position he plays 95% of the time for City?England need a manager who can get the best out of your best player - Foden.
Not sure why England can't find that controlling player from an attacking central position. Foden plays on the left for City because they have De Bruyne and Bernardo. England don't have that and playing him out wide is a bad use of his talent.
When has any England manager ever done that?
Who would you replace him with?He does always come across well, but he's a rubbish coach. Hope he quits.
He has to go, simply because his cycle has ended this evening… he is going to resign at the presser.
Yeah, unless Saka was injured he should not have come off. Was causing them lots of problems. Should have been Foden for Rashford and I think we could have won that. We totally let France back into the game.Mount too. Switch to 4-2-3-1 and get Grealish on for Henderson. And why take Saka off when he was our best creator? Totally killed us.
Who would you replace him with?
Who would England realistically replace him with? Genuinely no idea who they’d go for/who they would be able to get.