André Dominguez
Full Member
His use of substitutes in this game was terrible.
Again, people keep saying this but Rashford didn't do much when he was on either and he only came on about six minutes after Sterling.Terrible subs. Should have brought on Rashford sooner. Sterling was never going to make a difference.
Obviously but that wasn't the question.
When has any England manager ever done that?Zoo said:
Exactly France aren’t great and have been crippled with injuries. A good manager gets England through to the semis reasonably comfortably.
Because France were in the lead by then ffs...Rashford didn't actually do much when he came on though. I don't think there's much reason to believe we'd have been considerably better with Rashford on earlier.
What do you think about trying to get Tuchel? He seems to reach the final of every cup.
They clearly were for a period of about 15-20 minutes after HT after the goal.Uh, England were never "on top".
Well why don’t you wait and see how interesting it isSo you're literally saying that the bookies are wrong
interesting take.
The bookies are "wrong" about this stuff quite regularly.So you're literally saying that the bookies are wrong
interesting take.
Honestly some people are blinded by us playing well, which is largely down to the far superior calibre of players in our squad to the likes of Aaron Lennon, Heskey and Walcott starting on the 2010s.
But what's the point of having such a great team if you never try to put teams to the sword? These sorts of squads come by once every 30 years, our attacking talent in the squad is better than France given their injuries and yet we never fully utilise it. Southgate tries not lose, until we inevitably lose.
This. He cannot make subsistutions to save his life. Saka had been troubling the French all game long and he takes his out. And has there ever been a more meaningless player than Mason fecking Mount?
Take a bow and leave Southgate. England has a real good generation of players and they're wasted on him.
Not against a top nation. He beat Sweden.Was it not about getting to the semis reasonably comfortably??
Southgate literally did it 4 years ago.
He wasn't going to reach that ball anyway. He's just not as good as Foden or Saka, period.I'm no Mount fan, but he was very nearly the exact game changer you hope from by a sub!
By being clattered by a defender yes, but still.
Uh, England were never "on top".
He did feck all today
The bookies are "wrong" about this stuff quite regularly.
But Foden and Saka we're still causing problems, so I don't see what the obvious change would've been?He left it too long and France grew in confidence after a ropey start and went back in front obviously.
There were reports that he would be interested and he really liked living in England.
Big risk though, He's certainly not a "yes man" like Southgate. Bit of a marmite personality (I love Marmite and Tommy Tuchel).
Nope, you're right. I can't wait until Mauricio Pochettino leads United out as manager again. After all, he was odds on to take over at one point and the bookies don't make mistakes eh?
Foden was poor. England could have done with the pace of Rashford. Saka should obviously have stayed on.But Foden and Saka we're still causing problems, so I don't see what the obvious change would've been?
That's how I feel, too. He's almost the perfect England manager in a lot of ways. He's a decent human being. He's understated and not overly given to indulging names or reputations. He's also not prone to adding fuel to some of the dafter fires that surround the England team, which when you're under the scrutiny he and the team are, is essential. He wants the team to be more than the sum of its parts rather than relying on flashes of brilliance and personality-driven moments.Managing England is about more than managing the players. It's about managing the whole country, the expectation, the inevitable backlashes, the despicable but vocal racists when black players miss penalties, the media as desperate for a disaster as they are for success. And he's done OK. If you don't manage that the pressure on the players means that managing them is almost impossible. I like him. I'd hate him to manage United though.
Poch was bookies favourite for the United job when Ole was sacked. Also when Jose was sacked, for that matter.
Nope, you're right. I can't wait until Mauricio Pochettino leads United out as manager again. After all, he was odds on to take over at one point and the bookies don't make mistakes eh?
Transfer/manager markets are a load of shite. The liquidity in the markets are extremely small and it takes hardly any money to move the prices on them. The bookies know absolutely nothing about stuff like that.
Take care, bookies' odds reflect other people's expectations and where they place their money to ensure they don't lose money themselves.
I’m with you two.That's how I feel, too. He's almost the perfect England manager in a lot of ways. He's a decent human being. He's understated and not overly given to indulging names or reputations. He's also not prone to adding fuel to some of the dafter fires that surround the England team, which when you're under the scrutiny he and the team are, is essential. He wants the team to be more than the sum of its parts rather than relying on flashes of brilliance and personality-driven moments.
But like you, I wouldn't want him at United. Too many of his strengths as a manager are very particular to the management of the national team, at this this moment in time.
Think that was Kyle Walker mate.English pundits, fans, media etc can be so annoying. The notion that losing in the quarter finals keeps happening to just them is absurd. Southgate did a good job, he marked Mbappe out of the game with England truly competing with France.
This after taking England to the Euro finals and world cup semi-finals prior. What else could he have done?
There will eventually be a media push to sack him. he will get replaced and England will be back to being a group stage or second round exit.
Not to stick the knife in but the Netherlands are one of the only teams that are worse bottlejobs than England in European football and have a worse squad, so your criteria might be a bit misalignedIs he though? You largely outplayed France and played very well throughout (US match aside). Maybe deciding a Spurs player should take clutch penalties was a bit daft.
Not against a top nation. He beat Sweden.
You have to love these types that try to play the adult in the room but eventually end up looking clueless like all the Solskjaer fanboys on hereThink that was Kyle Walker mate.
Me?You have to love these types that try to play the adult in the room but eventually end up looking clueless like all the Solskjaer fanboys on here