Moonred
Full Member
Southampton has one of the best batting pitch in the country, doesn't it?
What utterly boring these two teams are! Do you guys actually watch whole match? These 2 play out a 5 test series borefest and SA-Australia is usually 2 or 3 test series. So unfortunate. Only test series worth watching is South Africa-Australia.
Try again..
What utterly boring these two teams are! Do you guys actually watch whole match? These 2 play out a 5 test series borefest and SA-Australia is usually 2 or 3 test series. So unfortunate. Only test series worth watching is South Africa-Australia.
No seriously. The 2nd test was absorbing and good contest in general but both of these captains are two negative in their approaches. Fair the pitch is not offering much but bowling team need to keep finding ways than being negative and batting team too generally show more inclination to score. It is not as bad a pitch as Trent bridge.
After that, if people still find this interesting, then either they love game or one team too much. No matter how one loved United, there were fair few games last season when many of us must have fell asleep. This is no different.
And then...
But it's fine, whatever floats your boat and all.
I really like Ballance. Big future.
Cook, Carberry, Ballance opening three?
Hmm, I suppose that's against the Left-Right combination you're supposed to do but Carberry offers some flair that's missing in that top 3 IMO.
I think him and Root will be regulars for England for a long time.
Ballance is the left handed Trott, wily accumulator. England need to sort out the opening spots though, don't think Carberry should have gotten dropped.
Carberry hasn't shown any flair an England shirt though.
England have never replaced Trescothick with a similarly positive opener. One of my favorite players.
Agreed.
Carberry was never really a long term option though and it seems that's what the selectors were after. Both Carberry and Compton got their chance but neither convinced and I can't see either getting their places back. Robson hasn't been great either but he could potentially get a lot better. It's a tough one but all the shuffling does us no favours so I wouldn't be surprised if we stuck with Robson for a while.
No seriously. The 2nd test was absorbing and good contest in general but both of these captains are two negative in their approaches. Fair the pitch is not offering much but bowling team need to keep finding ways than being negative and batting team too generally show more inclination to score. It is not as bad a pitch as Trent bridge.
After that, if people still find this interesting, then either they love game or one team too much. No matter how one loved United, there were fair few games last season when many of us must have fell asleep. This is no different.
It's not so much the teams faults if the pitch caries through at ankle height. Even Steyn and Johnson would have extracted nothing form that Trent Bridge pitch.
I'm not sure why you assume I love it this way, I've just watched two of England's opening batsmen have a cracking day, scoring runs so I can't complain too much.
I just think your statement that the only game worth watching is SA-AUS is frankly ridiculous. I suppose every game between them is an absolute ripper, or, perhaps more likely, they ebb and flow just like every other test match series..
Indian bowling has always been like this.
In fact, Indian bowling was worse than this in 2011 when we toured England.
The game comes to life when India are batting. We have the better(and definitely more aesthetic) batsmen and they have much better bowlers.
Reminds me of Ken Barrington, not very elegant or pleasing to watch but very hard to get out and ratchets away the runs.Ballance is such an underwhelming player but he's always getting runs.
Reminds me of Ken Barrington, not very elegant or pleasing to watch but very hard to get out and ratchets away the runs.
Glad to be wrong about Bell, hopefully he can cash in tomorrow England need him in the runs.
Waayyyy before my time pete, I'll take your word for it.
Batting looks good, need to find some bowlers now, like Jordan instead of Plunkett.
Why? Plunkett's better.
Jordan's got something about him, Plunkett's a better bowler but England are going to ruin him with that short ball bollocks.
Indeed.
I don't really mind the tactic as a tactic, but they need to be more selective with him. Yes short ball theory can work, but there's a time and a place.
The problems Cook, really, rather than Plunkett, but the fact he can't captain to save his life apparently is now forgotten because he got some runs on a flat deck.
Anyway, I assumed Jordan would come in for Stokes anyway, so I see Woakes as his replacement more, and unless Woakes has put on more pace over the last year he's still not an international bowler.
Yeah Cook is the elephant in the room at the moment but surely there's a point where Plunkett goes to his captain, 'Let's pitch it up,' etc. It seems more like something Moores and the selectors have Plunkett in the side for than anything, they want him to be England's Mitchell Johnson but he's not.
The thing is though, Mitchell Johnson was given the environment he was given by Clarke's good use of him, at the start of the summer I thought that was what Cook was doing and giving him shorter spells but now its more asking Plunkett to bang it in short for 7 overs on the bounce and then wondering why he looks tired and leggy.
I agree the bowler's should say to Cook that they want to bowl fuller and that doesn't seem to be happening, but I'd probably be a bit meak about suggestions if I was a new name in that dressing room given the treatment of KP for being honest.
Bowling short is such a typically English problem at the minute, and I don't really know where its come from. I want to blame David Saker, so I will, but if he's not telling them to bowl those lengths then something inexplicable is happening from concept to execution.
Not really sure with the England bowling department, they very nearly ruined the shit out of Finn who has gone back to Middlesex and seems much happier.
That's the problem I have with Jordan as well. It's such a waste of talent having someone that naturally capable of bowling quick bowling in the low 80s in test cricket because he doesn't run in properly but as soon as you start mucking around with stuff like that you're running the risk of ruining what made the player good.
Finn's the best example, his run up was shortened before NZ because he couldn't help but kick the stumps over (I actually thought he bowled really nicely off that run up) but he then didn't feel comfortable and lengthened it again and then turned to utter shit.