MJJ
New Member
fair play dude, I know I wouldve taken the piss if I was in your place.
Well you still can, we didnt even make it past the group stages
fair play dude, I know I wouldve taken the piss if I was in your place.
Rahane's 40 from 35 looks awfully bad in hindsight especially with India ending 2 down. Maybe they should have stuck with Dhawan considering this was a flat track?
I reckon England are better suited to defend a total, if they have toYep.
Two batting sides. Both wanting to chase. Toss is gonna matter.
Dhoni was having a laugh in the end. Basically said that we lost due to the toss and conditions. The bowling was garbage. Pandaya's 18 runs over and that Jadeja's 6 misfield cost us the match.
It was, like I said, boring run fest.I'd actually call it a poor match
I'm not sure of that... Captain rarely seems to know what to do when defending.I reckon England are better suited to defend a total, if they have to
Kohlis World Cup.
5 Matches
273 Runs
137 Average
147 Strike Rate
Deserved to win this.
You can still point out to obvious mistakes made. Like the 2 no balls along with the catch which then got called a six.
Yeah right, as if that's a great thing these days. I'll most probably end up watching the WC final.
1 Wicket pls
I've rarely read this thread dude, or cricket on this forum in general.Who is this majority you experience? Cause they ain't in this thread, unless I've missed something huge it's purely been the Indians who fancied themselves.
I didn't mean you, I meant Dhoni. Also, you don't know how wickets would affect a match. It is bizarre to say that if we had got their top scorer out for around 20, it would not have been a closer (if not a different result) game.uh, I didn't blame the toss for that.
We'd have lost even if someone else had bowled instead of Pandya(who?). The no balls maybe, but that's the nature of the game. You can't say "we'd have won if not for no balls".
Ashwin was getting smashed. Jadeja got smashed. We were 8 overs light on that pitch even if you had another bowler instead of Pandya.
If WI had bowled second, they'd ahve gotten smashed in a similar way.
Dhawan would've got out at 5.
Kohlis World Cup.
5 Matches
273 Runs
137 Average
147 Strike Rate
Deserved to win this.
It's gotten to a point that it feels cruel to make fun of you lot. Still 11-0 thoughWell you still can, we didnt even make it past the group stages
You don't know that. A wicket can be a turning point in a match, let alone one when they were still trying to get a partnership going.The no ball from Ashwin was inexcusable, no doubt. My point though was that WI were well ahead even if the first catch off Simmons was legal.
I'm not so much bothered as surprised. I can't say I browse cricket forums, so you may well be right.I've rarely read this thread dude, or cricket on this forum in general.
Cricket forums around the net are a bigger reflection. English fans in general anywhere really, doesnt take much for you lot to get all giddy. Anyway like I said, you shouldn't be bothered if you aren't one of them.
In last WT20 he had 319 runs @ 106. One man team!
Which, dare I say it, may well have been more use if it meant Kohli facing more balls or your lower order hitters that didn't get a knock having a look in.
I've rarely read this thread dude, or cricket on this forum in general.
Cricket forums around the net are a bigger reflection. English fans in general anywhere really, doesnt take much for you lot to get all giddy. Anyway like I said, you shouldn't be bothered if you aren't one of them.
You don't know that. A wicket can be a turning point in a match, let alone one when they were still trying to get a partnership going.
At that point? They were 50-2 at that stage with the reqd RR still close to 12. A wicket then would have been huge.You can't know for sure in a what-if scenario. But on a Wankhede flat track? The odds were definitely in their favor. They would have had to choke at that point for India to win.
The no ball from Ashwin was inexcusable, no doubt. My point though was that WI were well ahead even if the first catch off Simmons was legal.
Manish Pandey should have opened IMO.Rahane's 40 from 35 looks awfully bad in hindsight especially with India ending 2 down. Maybe they should have stuck with Dhawan considering this was a flat track?
And I was rooting for you against Australia but that fecker Khalid LatifYou really are senti right now, arent you I was actually rooting for you guys but how is that an insult.
They played better because our bowlers had no clue how to bowl on a flat track. One would think with all the experience they have had having been brought up on flat tracks, they would have known how to mix it up.I think being honest 193 was enough. They just played better.
Exactly, can't blame the batsmen. On a flat track, it always boils down to whose batsmen can hit harderI think being honest 193 was enough. They just played better.
Indeed. A wicket then would have very likely meant Ashwin bowled out 4 overs at a stretch.At that point? They were 50-2 at that stage with the reqd RR still close to 12. A wicket then would have been huge.
He only bowls trash. He doesn't know any way else to bowl. So letting him in the bowl in the first place itself is wrong.I still cant believe how bad we bowled. Conceded a boundary or more nearly every over. Poor from Dhoni too. Allowing Pandya to not only bowl but bowl trash.
I still cant believe how bad we bowled. Conceded a boundary or more nearly every over. Poor from Dhoni too. Allowing Pandya to not only bowl but bowl trash.
Nah it's got nothing on the one that revolved around Cook, Strauss, Trott, Broad, Anderson and Swann. That was class.This is the best England team I've seen in my lifetime. Bowling is a bit meh but batting wise it's very anti-English to what everyone's used to. Should be a good game
Yeah, for a flat track, you don't need to be technically superior, just a hard hitting batsman. Had it been a challenging wicket, this WI side has struggled (vs SA, Afg)I love WW's arrogance though. Don't even bother running or panicking. 3 dot balls? No worries, will hit the next two for six. All while Kohli was running his ass of like a madman. They were probably laughing at him
This is the best England team I've seen in my lifetime. Bowling is a bit meh but batting wise it's very anti-English to what everyone's used to. Should be a good game
I think being honest 193 was enough. They just played better.
And I was rooting for you against Australia but that fecker Khalid Latif