wolvored
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2016
- Messages
- 10,405
A swap with Ugarte may be the best option for both players and teams.
What?? Rashford is easily worth double of what Ugarte is worth and I'm one of those who wants Rashford to be sold. Let's not underrate our own players now. Or in this case, seems you are overrating Ugarte by quite a bit.A swap with Ugarte may be the best option for both players and teams.
1. This incident happened in 2023.
2. He was not at fault in the accident that totalled his car. The other party’s insurance paid out.
I fell for the clickbait too.
If we were trying to sell. He's worth what someone is willing to pay.What?? Rashford is easily worth double of what Ugarte is worth and I'm one of those who wants Rashford to be sold. Let's not underrate our own players now. Or in this case, seems you are overrating Ugarte by quite a bit.
My whole point was arguing about how it would be a good deal to swap Ugarte and Rashford. That presumably means they value both similarly. For all his faults Rashford is way more proven than Ugarte. And if someone isn't willing to meet our valuation then he won't get sold, it's that simple.If we were trying to sell. He's worth what someone is willing to pay.
If he was put up for sale tomorrow and Rashford wanted out, who's going to buy him, and for how much?
The problem when you're trying to sell these sorts of players for huge fees is there's actually very few clubs in Europe who have the sort of money to spend over £50m on a player. Pretty much just Madrid, Bayern, PSG and a few top premier league sides. Generally you don't want to sell to a premier league rival either. And if United deem him not good enough and want rid, why would the elite clubs in Europe want him when they're currently better teams than we are. And for nearly 100 million?
Occasionally you get lucky and a less wealthy club sell a player for a huge fee that summer and so it gives them some funds to bring in a replacement. But then you have the issue that these sorts of players think they're above certain clubs and expect to play for one of elite sides, even if those elite sides are not interested.
We may get lucky if PSG haven't noticed he's had 2 dreadful seasons in the last 3, but their interest in him looks to have cooled off, even with Mbappe leaving which opens up a spot. And no other rich club in Europe is buying him. And we'd be very very lucky to get the £80m we could have gotten over the last 2 or 3 years, he's no longer considered a young talent ready to reach the next level. He's soon to be 27, is very reliant on pace and lately he's having more dreadful seasons than he has good ones.
Pretty sure he's talking about his personality. If someone endangers your life, how can you not learn from it but go and do exactly the same to others? Is amnesia an excuse because it happened last year?1. This incident happened in 2023.
2. He was not at fault in the accident that totalled his car. The other party’s insurance paid out.
So if they value Ugarte at £60 mill you value Rashford at over £120 mill? I would love to know how you come to that valuation. No one would pay £60 mill for Rashford today, as the club have informed the world virtually everyone is for sale, yet no enquiries for Rashford have been made, not even a made up story in the media.What?? Rashford is easily worth double of what Ugarte is worth and I'm one of those who wants Rashford to be sold. Let's not underrate our own players now. Or in this case, seems you are overrating Ugarte by quite a bit.
Given his wages and antics last year, there may be flexibility in the valuation. Who knows.My whole point was arguing about how it would be a good deal to swap Ugarte and Rashford. That presumably means they value both similarly. For all his faults Rashford is way more proven than Ugarte. And if someone isn't willing to meet our valuation then he won't get sold, it's that simple.
We have seen Everton hold off on their valuation of Branthwaite, we can easily do the same for our academy product. And our club has said all along that they will only consider substantial bids and will help him get back to his best form. That doesn't mean we will get rid but sell if the price is right.
I would prefer if he gets sold, but I would be even more thrilled if he buckled down, worked hard, and returned to his best form for us.
So if they value Ugarte at £60 mill you value Rashford at over £120 mill? I would love to know how you come to that valuation. No one would pay £60 mill for Rashford today, as the club have informed the world virtually everyone is for sale, yet no enquiries for Rashford have been made, not even a made up story in the media.
Quoting my other post here as that applies but Rashford had good seasons too, way more proven than Ugarte, way more experienced than him. Ugarte isn't worth anything close to £60m. The club has indicated their willingness to entertain offers, but they will only consider substantial bids for Rashford. We acknowledge that he has had some underwhelming seasons; however, we are firm in our stance that we won't part with a proven Premier League player and a valuable academy product for a modest fee.My whole point was arguing about how it would be a good deal to swap Ugarte and Rashford. That presumably means they value both similarly. For all his faults Rashford is way more proven than Ugarte. And if someone isn't willing to meet our valuation then he won't get sold, it's that simple.
We have seen Everton hold off on their valuation of Branthwaite, we can easily do the same for our academy product. And our club has said all along that they will only consider substantial bids and will help him get back to his best form. That doesn't mean we will get rid but sell if the price is right.
I would prefer if he gets sold, but I would be even more thrilled if he buckled down, worked hard, and returned to his best form for us.
There may be a flexibility in his valuation yes, but we don't know. Nobody but the club knows actually. It's just my opinion that Rashford is worth way more than Ugarte. Club might feel differently about it, no question.Given his wages and antics last year, there may be flexibility in the valuation. Who knows.
If he stays, I just don’t see him turning into a quality, consistent performer. He’s been here 9 years and scored 83 goals. I can’t think of many players who’ve been at a big club that long and then suddenly turned into a world beater.
If a club offered £60 mill today I think Utd would snap their hand off. Yes hes homegrown, but why does that even count when he sporadically performs on the pitch. If he had been at City/Liverpool and played exactly the same, I think he would have been moved on by now, never mind given an undeserved massive pay rise.Quoting my other post here as that applies but Rashford had good seasons too, way more proven than Ugarte, way more experienced than him. Ugarte isn't worth anything close to £60m. The club has indicated their willingness to entertain offers, but they will only consider substantial bids for Rashford. We acknowledge that he has had some underwhelming seasons; however, we are firm in our stance that we won't part with a proven Premier League player and a valuable academy product for a modest fee.
Maybe, we don't know. But that doesn't mean Ugarte is worth £60m too. He was marginalized at PSG by their new manager so really can't judge his season there fairly, so his good performances have come in the Portuguese league. Yes, he was good for Uruguay but even Pellistri has good performances for them and he isn't close to being a starter for us.If a club offered £60 mill today I think Utd would snap their hand off. Yes hes homegrown, but why does that even count when he sporadically performs on the pitch. If he had been at City/Liverpool and played exactly the same, I think he would have been moved on by now, never mind given an undeserved massive pay rise.
Has he ever had back to back poor seasons? Genuinely curious.
I agree with that personally. I Think £40 mill tops, but thats what they value him at, because thats exactly the fee that Benfica want for Neves. I expect if we left it until August, we may get a reduction as they get desperate. Saying that other teams are reportedly sniffing around as well.Maybe, we don't know. But that doesn't mean Ugarte is worth £60m too. He was marginalized at PSG by their new manager so really can't judge his season there fairly, so his good performances have come in the Portuguese league. Yes, he was good for Uruguay but even Pellistri has good performances for them and he isn't close to being a starter for us.
Pretty sure he's talking about his personality. If someone endangers your life, how can you not learn from it but go and do exactly the same to others? Is amnesia an excuse because it happened last…
Yea none of those other teams are paying £60m for him. It's just posturing from PSG's end.I agree with that personally. I Think £40 mill tops, but thats what they value him at, because thats exactly the fee that Benfica want for Neves. I expect if we left it until August, we may get a reduction as they get desperate. Saying that other teams are reportedly sniffing around as well.
I love the implication that Rashford is some kind of exacting perfectionist with lofty standards that his teammates fail to meet...No, his bad two seasons have coincided with the two seasons when the team has been a dysfunctional mess. Every time we get a half decent team around him he performs well.
I do agree with those saying it’s an important season for him though. He’s 27 in October and is one of our most experienced players. No letting his head drop if the team doesn’t perform as well as he hopes, no off-field issues and show encouragement to the group of youngsters we’ve got in. He’s the shining light (talent wise) in our team and he needs to show it.
The "he can only perform if he have good players around him"-excuse is so bad.No, his bad two seasons have coincided with the two seasons when the team has been a dysfunctional mess. Every time we get a half decent team around him he performs well.
I do agree with those saying it’s an important season for him though. He’s 27 in October and is one of our most experienced players. No letting his head drop if the team doesn’t perform as well as he hopes, no off-field issues and show encouragement to the group of youngsters we’ve got in. He’s the shining light (talent wise) in our team and he needs to show it.
I’m sure it’s all legit, and he’s unlucky, but “Working like a madman in a personal preseason to be ready” and ‘Has a knock, can’t play any minutes in a friendly’ just a fortnight after, is fecking wild.
Ifr he does that why would you want to sell him?
I would start Rashford from the bench start of the season. Bring him back to earth a bit. If he thinks hes a surefire starter, then thats when complacency sets in.
I agree. Let’s hope TH does as well.I think it's only logical that Garnacho has the left wing spot and Amad the right wing spot. They're theirs on merit.
This is what I'd play too at the start of the season. That being said let's see how pre season goes. If Rashford kicks into form it's entirely possible he plays himself into the first 11.I think it's only logical that Garnacho has the left wing spot and Amad the right wing spot. They're theirs on merit.
Under INEOS im hoping for a patient and considered movement back towards the times when the club is the star of the show and those who aren’t on board get unceremoniously moved on. The emotional rollercoaster that is the Rashford show has got pretty fecking boring now. Next!