KingMinger22
City >>> United. Moaning twat
150 million
For Kane and Ali. Would you do push the button if the club were willing?
Hilarious. But, yes. In a second.
150 million
For Kane and Ali. Would you do push the button if the club were willing?
Hilarious. But, yes. In a second.
It's not so much whether Spurs ''care'' about United or a similar financial giants' money. It's whether Kane will. And he certainly will, sooner or later, expect to be paid in the Rooney type wages band.
Maybe Spurs will change their entire business model in a year, and give him the going rate - he looks like a £250k pw+ player to me. Superstar, scores all the goals.
Most likely, they won't and he will leave. Not this coming season, but probably next.
Don't be deluded. It is entirely about the money. As Muller put it, ultimately it is a player's job and career. Of course, making as much dough as possible is a key factor.
You cannot expect a player who could EASILY earn £250-300k tomorrow at United/Real/City, etc. to stay happy, medium term, on £70k or £150k or even £200k.
It's not so much whether Spurs ''care'' about United or a similar financial giants' money. It's whether Kane will. And he certainly will, sooner or later, expect to be paid in the Rooney type wages band.
Maybe Spurs will change their entire business model in a year, and give him the going rate - he looks like a £250k pw+ player to me. Superstar, scores all the goals.
Most likely, they won't and he will leave. Not this coming season, but probably next.
Don't be deluded. It is entirely about the money. As Muller put it, ultimately it is a player's job and career. Of course, making as much dough as possible is a key factor.
You cannot expect a player who could EASILY earn £250-300k tomorrow at United/Real/City, etc. to stay happy, medium term, on £70k or £150k or even £200k.
Come on man , Bale won the 4th place trophy. What has Kane ever done?
Back to back seasons of high quality forward play and stacks of goals.... If I'm his advisor this is the summer to make the big move.
If he stays at Spurs next year all sorts of things can go wrong: manager leaves, team loses mojo or maybe he becomes a 2 hit wonder.
If I was his advisor I'd tell him Either spurs pay him £200k per week or he moves.
If he moves, United, Chelsea, Madrid, maybe even City all need a top striker. Market is perfect for him (and Lukaku)
Well this is just wrong, considering we give more chances to our young players then any other team. But I do get your general point that people have started thinking that just having money is enough to turn other players' heads. Money does eventually make its mark, like it has for City, Chelsea, PSG, Real Madrid, etc., but it doesn't make every player leave their current club if the team isn't in a good shape atm.As I've said before, This is where Man. Utd - and some Man. fans - get it so wrong. Because of your wealth you've fallen into the money trap .... here's some examples
* You pay astronomical wages to Rooney, although he now contributes relatively little to the team and can't now be moved on because of those wages.
* You commit to paying anything up to close to £60m for a talented teenager (Martial), but ignore the likes of Dele Alli for £5m
* You spend much of your transfer windows chasing 'galactico' or big-name signings, mostly don't succeed, but when you do it's for an over-the-hill player (e.g. Schweinsteiger) looking for one last big pay-day.
* You neglect your scouting, player recruitment and youth development systems ... because the main focus is on buying your way to success.
Spurs will never pay Kane £250-300k per week (nor any other player for that matter). I expect he'll be offered (and will sign) an improved contract this summer for around £100k. I also think he'll be very happy with that, with continuing to play for Spurs and with the prospect of playing in the CL next season.
If he eventually leaves to go abroad for the likes of RM and bigger wages (which won't be anytime soon), then so be it. Spurs would then get a bucket load of money, invest some of it in further improving our youth development system and see the next batch of quality players rise up through the ranks.
The opinions in this thread seem kind of ironic how we normally criticise "mercenaries" on here when they sign with Chelsea/City/Real.
He's under contract - he can't just go. And plenty of things can go wrong at lots other clubs too - I doubt Kane sees much greener grass elsewhere right now.
The opinions in this thread seem kind of ironic how we normally criticise "mercenaries" on here when they sign with Chelsea/City/Real.
If Kane doesn't get a 200k/week contract within the summer of 2017, I think that he'll be off. He might love Spurs, yada yada, but in the end money will talk.As I've said before, This is where Man. Utd - and some Man. fans - get it so wrong. Because of your wealth you've fallen into the money trap .... here's some examples
* You pay astronomical wages to Rooney, although he now contributes relatively little to the team and can't now be moved on because of those wages.
* You commit to paying anything up to close to £60m for a talented teenager (Martial), but ignore the likes of Dele Alli for £5m
* You spend much of your transfer windows chasing 'galactico' or big-name signings, mostly don't succeed, but when you do it's for an over-the-hill player (e.g. Schweinsteiger) looking for one last big pay-day.
* You neglect your scouting, player recruitment and youth development systems ... because the main focus is on buying your way to success.
Spurs will never pay Kane £250-300k per week (nor any other player for that matter). I expect he'll be offered (and will sign) an improved contract this summer for around £100k. I also think he'll be very happy with that, with continuing to play for Spurs and with the prospect of playing in the CL next season.
If he eventually leaves to go abroad for the likes of RM and bigger wages (which won't be anytime soon), then so be it. Spurs would then get a bucket load of money, invest some of it in further improving our youth development system and see the next batch of quality players rise up through the ranks.
Nope. You can get Griezmann and Reus (to name a few) for less than that, and either of them is better than Kane, and far better than Ali.150 million
For Kane and Ali. Would you do push the button if the club were willing?
Kane will never join Chelsea so that wont happen.If Kane doesn't get a 200k/week contract within the summer of 2017, I think that he'll be off. He might love Spurs, yada yada, but in the end money will talk.
I remember that you were convinced that Bale won't leave Spurs and were as sure as now for Kane, and in the end of the season he left.
For what is worth, I don't think that Kane will join United, mainly because Levy is a pain in the arse, but if Madrid offers 80m or so, then he'll leave you. If that doesn't happen, then we can see a bidding war between Chelsea and the two Manchester clubs. The other option is of course, for Spurs to pay a lot of money to him and to continue being competitive. I think that both of these things have a very small likelihood of happening, with or without the new stadium, sponsorship and Pochetino.
I was one of those who thought that it would be 'beyond stupid' to spunk 50m on him last summer. Was I wrong..
I was skeptical that he would be able to match his premier league goal tally anytime soon. Think he has already equaled, or may be exceeded it after the goal last night, the number of PL goals he scored last season.
He is a pure goal scorer, and they are like gold dust. Would prefer him over any other striker right now.
If Kane doesn't get a 200k/week contract within the summer of 2017, I think that he'll be off. He might love Spurs, yada yada, but in the end money will talk.
I remember that you were convinced that Bale won't leave Spurs and were as sure as now for Kane, and in the end of the season he left.
For what is worth, I don't think that Kane will join United, mainly because Levy is a pain in the arse, but if Madrid offers 80m or so, then he'll leave you. If that doesn't happen, then we can see a bidding war between Chelsea and the two Manchester clubs. The other option is of course, for Spurs to pay a lot of money to him and to continue being competitive. I think that both of these things have a very small likelihood of happening, with or without the new stadium, sponsorship and Pochetino.
Chelsea's top earner is on 200K. Only the Manchester clubs are paying those wages.Bottom line is no matter how much he loves his club or even how well Spurs do, he is going to leave in a season or absolute max two for his proper pay day.
Unless Spurs find a way to pay him the market rate for a top player - as United, Arsenal, City and Chelsea do. That is currently £250-300k. In a year or two it could be north of that.
On some level I hope they do. I think it would be good for the league.
What's baffling to me is people who can't look past a player's age. 35 goals, at least 14 assists in 39 appearances this season. World class technical ability and a winner. The type of player who can put us in title contention by himself. All that for a free transfer vs a likely record fee that it would take to get Kane. Statistically and by reputation, Ibra is easily a better player than Kane and its not even close.
I think the English bias is too strong for some posters here who can't fathom the idea of why someone could prefer Zlatan over Kane, given the circumstances. But I'm not English so I dont have to see it that way.
What's baffling to me is people who can't look past a player's age. 35 goals, at least 14 assists in 39 appearances this season. World class technical ability and a winner. The type of player who can put us in title contention by himself. All that for a free transfer vs a likely record fee that it would take to get Kane. Statistically and by reputation, Ibra is easily a better player than Kane and its not even close.
I think the English bias is too strong for some posters here who can't fathom the idea of why someone could prefer Zlatan over Kane, given the circumstances. But I'm not English so I dont have to see it that way.
Highly doubt we'll get him, wouldn't waste our time because Levy refuses to do business with us after the Berba deal. I'd rather give Wilson some game time and help him progress.
Money is the name of the game.
We are not talking about small differences here. Sure, players might accept slightly lower wages to play for their preferred clubs. But double or triple? No.
You can't keep players happy without paying them a fair market wage.
It doesn't happen.
He will be earning mega money somewhere in the next year.