Gun control

There are home invasions and murders in my city pretty much every other day.

Easy answer would be move somewhere else. Bringing a gun into your home increases the chances of a death. Tampa is fairly high crime but there are plenty of places where you can leave your doors and windows unlocked.


Also, having pain medicine, rat/insect/lawn poison, blunt and sharp objects, can accomplish the same things as you've listed above.

They can but blowing your brains out is a quick painless act. Also a child taking poison by mistake is not necessarily lethal.... its hard to scrape a kids brains off the fridge and expect the ER stuff to make them better.
 
WW2 wasn’t big enough for you? But WW2 actually showed why the average citizen should be armed to protect/defend themselves. Just imagine if Stalin, Mao and Hitler came up again an armed population
Edit: great username! @Desert Eagle

Feel free to discuss your utterly stupid sentiment with a German holding a degree in historical science. Not sure you should though. I give you a hint: Hitler actually got rid of various gun control laws.
 
Impressive, but I don’t want my government to set up a tip hotline so citizens can report other citizens. That sounds like a terrible idea spawn from good intentions.

I don't like it either to be honest, they used the " fear of being sold out" card, but I have to say this is one of the few inititives that our government had any success with. Usually everything goes tits up here.
 
WW2 wasn’t big enough for you? But WW2 actually showed why the average citizen should be armed to protect/defend themselves. Just imagine if Stalin, Mao and Hitler came up again an armed population
Edit: great username! @Desert Eagle
I'm sorry but I try to stay away from the gun discussion as much as I can but like others before me I just want to say I find this excuse for gun ownership so laughable. I can understand your regular self defense arguments etc but do not agree with it. To think however some folks with their own little arsenal could have done anything to prevent the world s biggest oppressors from taking power is seriously out of touch with reality.
 
Easy answer would be move somewhere else. Bringing a gun into your home increases the chances of a death. Tampa is fairly high crime but there are plenty of places where you can leave your doors and windows unlocked.

They can but blowing your brains out is a quick painless act. Also a child taking poison by mistake is not necessarily lethal.... its hard to scrape a kids brains off the fridge and expect the ER stuff to make them better.
In what world is just so easy to just up and move? I must live in a different world than you.

I'm well aware of what happens when people don't follow the basic rules of firearm safety... the consequences are the same as when people don't put poisonous things out of the reach of kids. In both instances, it isn't the inanimate object's fault.

As for the stuff about suicide, you act as if people only shoot themselves. If they want to die, they'll find a way.
What are your views on conceal carry and open carry ?
That one is tougher for me. I've had a concealed carry permit for awhile, but even still, I wish they weren't allowed. Considering they are, I take the "better to have and not need than have not and do need" approach.
like a mexican standoff? someone has to start putting it down
I don't know what you're getting at here.
 
pretty sure I didn't understand your post from before, then. I thought you meant because others have access to guns, you want to have access as well to defend yourself from those people. Which would have created a situation simillar to a mexican standoff and keeps you from laying your weapon down due to your suspicion.
Sorry if that wasn't what you meant
Ahhhh... I understand what you're saying.

If the US gov't pulled, say, an Australia and did a buyback and collected all the AR/AK style rifles and destroyed them, I'd follow the law and turn mine in without protest.

As it stands, yeah, I guess it would resemble a Mexican Standoff in that regard.
 
I'm sorry but I try to stay away from the gun discussion as much as I can but like others before me I just want to say I find this excuse for gun ownership so laughable. I can understand your regular self defense arguments etc but do not agree with it. To think however some folks with their own little arsenal could have done anything to prevent the world s biggest oppressors from taking power is seriously out of touch with reality.

There’s theee things you can use to get rid of an oppressive dictatorship: overwhelming public support, foreign invasion or a combination of both. Private gun ownership isn’t one of them.
 
that's reasonable! I hope we will experience the day where something like that happens in the US. It could save many souls.
Agreed. It would be nice, to say the least.
Some will but many won’t. A lot of suicide attempts are impulsive acts and suicide by firearm is the fastest, least painful and most fatal method.
What used to be the fastest, least painful, and most fatal method? To me, humans would just revert to that.
 
In what world is just so easy to just up and move? I must live in a different world than you.


Americans are generally mobile when it comes to jobs. At least 10% of my street moves every spring and most people move several times in their life time. Some even move several thousand miles and across oceans. If the safety and security of your family is a real concern one would find a way of moving IMO.
 
Americans are generally mobile when it comes to jobs. At least 10% of my street moves every spring and most people move several times in their life time. Some even move several thousand miles and across oceans. If the safety and security of your family is a real concern one would find a way of moving IMO.
That’s nice.

We aren’t going to be able to move for awhile.
 
There is absolutely no reason for the general population to have firearms. Absolutley none, not a single one.
 
There is absolutely no reason for the general population to have firearms. Absolutley none, not a single one.

In a lot of countries that is true. However the US is rather large an it has a lot of remote areas and several animals that can attack humans. There is no need for firearms for the majority of Americans but there are definitely areas where you can make an argument in favor.
 
to my personal shame my forefathers have wiped entire armies off this planet and you really think some armed texan peasants would have stopped the Wehrmacht?
you are talking about a time where guns were a lot less regulated in Europe btw
I never said stopped. But all you have to do is look at Afghanistan, whether you agree with their politics or not, they’ve faced the night of the USSR and more recently, the US, and because the population is armed, they have been able to not get “conquered”. Forgive me if I’ve offended anyone with this example, but Afghanistan is dtill fighting, no?
 
latest
 
Feel free to discuss your utterly stupid sentiment with a German holding a degree in historical science. Not sure you should though. I give you a hint: Hitler actually got rid of various gun control laws.
I’ll discuss this with anyone, no matter how far you have you head shoved up your own....degree. Forget what type of education I have or the experiences that I have! You have a German historical degree...discussion over!
 
I'm sorry but I try to stay away from the gun discussion as much as I can but like others before me I just want to say I find this excuse for gun ownership so laughable. I can understand your regular self defense arguments etc but do not agree with it. To think however some folks with their own little arsenal could have done anything to prevent the world s biggest oppressors from taking power is seriously out of touch with reality.
See my other post using Afghanistan as one example. The only thing laughable is your naivety towards armed defense
 
You are seriously saying that if the government turned on the people that you with your weapons would be able to defend yourself?
Not just me. Do you really think the whole military would follow orders and obliterate their own population? Look at previous examples. I am not looking to defend my sovereignty on a rooftop with a pistol in my hand. My original argument was so far away from where we are at this juncture, that the topic has disintegrated
 
You calling me naive:lol:

Like I said, I hope you never have to face that situation, but if you’re ever in a life or death situation, you’ll be begging for something stronger than your sense of humor and amazing ability to lay flat on the ground. I guess ignorance really is bliss!:lol:

No. It's not ignorance because you have said you haven't been in a situation like that either. So for all your bravado you don't know how you will react. AND the fact you haven't been in a situation like that yet are continuously prepared for it says more about you than me. Like I said, I would rather live life not worrying about things like that, let alone worrying to the point I felt I needed to be armed.

Your arguments about rising up against your government or others are hilarious though. You should do stand up, your sense of humour is far funnier than mine.

Ze Germans indeed :lol:
 
There’s theee things you can use to get rid of an oppressive dictatorship: overwhelming public support, foreign invasion or a combination of both. Private gun ownership isn’t one of them.
Private gun ownership, by itself, would not get rid of an oppressive dictatorship. But it at least gives the unwilling population some protection against an armed force.

Let me ask you another question. Let’s say the dictator has completely taken over. What’s the best (only?) way to fight back and start a revolution? Armed revolution or unarmed revolution?
 
No. It's not ignorance because you have said you haven't been in a situation like that either. So for all your bravado you don't know how you will react. AND the fact you haven't been in a situation like that yet are continuously prepared for it says more about you than me. Like I said, I would rather live life not worrying about things like that, let alone worrying to the point I felt I needed to be armed.

Your arguments about rising up against your government or others are hilarious though. You should do stand up, your sense of humour is far funnier than mine.

Ze Germans indeed :lol:
I said that I hope I’m never in that situation, but I’ve been in plenty of dangerous situations where my life could’ve been in danger. Just last week on the Interstate near where I live, I was driving home and was two vehicles away from a road rage incident that had one man attacking another with a steel bar.
I’ve witnessed guns being shown during street fights. I’ve never claimed bravado. But continue to laugh. I also never said that I’d rise up against my government. I said that an armed population can stand up against a government trying to suppress the people. That was just one of many reasons I gave for owning a gun.
To stay on point, my original argument was that if celebrities and politicians can have armed security, the the average citizens should also have that right.
 
I said that I hope I’m never in that situation, but I’ve been in plenty of dangerous situations where my life could’ve been in danger. Just last week on the Interstate near where I live, I was driving home and was two vehicles away from a road rage incident that had one man attacking another with a steel bar.
I’ve witnessed guns being shown during street fights. I’ve never claimed bravado. But continue to laugh. I also never said that I’d rise up against my government. I said that an armed population can stand up against a government trying to suppress the people. That was just one of many reasons I gave for owning a gun.
To stay on point, my original argument was that if celebrities and politicians can have armed security, the the average citizens should also have that right.

As have I been in many incredibly dangerous situations too. However an armed poplulation has no chance against drones and apache gunships and armoured tanks. Why you can't see this is beyond me.

Your original point was already debunked by several users pages ago. It's as ludicrous now as it was then. Not comparable at all. But continue to use false equivalence or implausible scenarios to argue and add justification to your point, It's working so well.
 
As have I been in many incredibly dangerous situations too. However an armed poplace has no chance against drones and apache gunships and armoured tanks. Why you can't see this is beyond me.
No chance? I beg to differ (see Afghanistan). But also, you're assuming that the military flying those drones, apache gunships and driving those armoured tanks will completely follow orders and fight against their own populace? You think every General will continue to follow orders? History tells me otherwise. An armed populace is only 1 of many aspects toward fighting tyranny.

Your original point was already debunked by several users pages ago. It's as ludicrous now as it was then. Not comparable at all. But continue to use false equivalence or implausible scenarios to argue and add justification to your point, It's working so well.
My original point was never debunked. If you think its ludicrous, then tell me why you think Taylor Swift can have an armed security detail, but the ordinary citizens have to depend on Law Enforcement for protection? This country was built on the pillar of self defense. I will not try to change your opinion or your nation's laws, but don't try to change mine.
 
I think this discussion has run its course. If bump stocks and 100 round mags are still on sale there is no hope of change.
Change would be enforcing the laws that we have now, to begin with. If there's millions of illegal guns on the streets of the US right now, then how would new gun control work? Answer: it would only affect the legal, law-abiding citizen
@Mike Schatner you said that you're living in Tampa right now. How did you feel when that street serial killer was on the loose?
 
Change would be enforcing the laws that we have now, to begin with. If there's millions of illegal guns on the streets of the US right now, then how would new gun control work? Answer: it would only affect the legal, law-abiding citizen
@Mike Schatner you said that you're living in Tampa right now. How did you feel when that street serial killer was on the loose?

Unaffected TBH. Firstly I do not live in that area and secondly simple precautions like don't be out by yourself would have been sufficient. Which goes to my home invasion advice....avoiding confrontation is always better than escalating it.