pauldyson1uk
Full Member
First 2 good , 3rd was just dreadfulNo Die Hard love?
First 2 good , 3rd was just dreadfulNo Die Hard love?
Iron Man 1 and 2 very good , third was well below par, the Mandarin was easy one worst baddies ever.The Naked Guns.
The Iron Men.
The Evil Deads.
Iron Man 1 and 2 very good , third was well below par, the Mandarin was easy one worst baddies ever.
Paul Robinson? He really does get around.He wasn't a baddie in that film. It was the dude from Neighbours.
Harold Bishop?He wasn't a baddie in that film. It was the dude from Neighbours.
Lord of the Rings and nothing else comes close
Lord of the Rings and nothing else comes close
Given all 3 LotR movies were shot simultaneously, do they really count? They're essentially 1 movie cut into three parts (just as the book was). May need to DQ them on a technicality to give the other options a fighting chance.
"That still only counts as one!"
-GimliSalt Bailly
Lord of the Rings and its not even remotely close. But to add some great trilogies.
Toy Story
Planet of the Apes
Harry Potter (I know there's 8 but they are pretty solid movies except one of them)
Captain America
OG Star Wars
They weren't completely shot back to back, there was extensive additional shooting prior to each sequel, and the editing and score were being done right to the last minute. Plus they made some stuff up for the Two Towers so it had more of a traditional climax. Definitely three separate films.Given all 3 LotR movies were shot simultaneously, do they really count? They're essentially 1 movie cut into three parts (just as the book was). May need to DQ them on a technicality to give the other options a fighting chance.
I don't usually place too much value on awards, but calling a movie with 11 Oscar wins on 11 nominations (including Best Picture) "below par" is quite something. Or maybe it's just setting par extremely high.I'm surprised at how unanimous the love for LOTR is - I definitely love them, but 3 especially is below par. Really struggled to get through it on the last rewatch.
The first film is perfect though.
I place very little value to the oscars, and I think it's weird that the weakest of the 3 got so many. I mean it certainly deserved most of the technical ones, but looking at some of the nominees, I feel there must have been massive lobbying for ROTK.I don't usually place too much value on awards, but calling a movie with 11 Oscar wins on 11 nominations (including Best Picture) "below par" is quite something. Or maybe it's just setting par extremely high.
That being said, I agree that the first one is the best.
Yes correctHe wasn't a baddie in that film. It was the dude from Neighbours.
I think it's that it rounds off the trilogy and that it has the most spectacle and elaborate battle sequences. And to be fair, it also has some incredible character and emotional moments.I place very little value to the oscars, and I think it's weird that the weakest of the 3 got so many. I mean it certainly deserved most of the technical ones, but looking at some of the nominees, I feel there must have been massive lobbying for ROTK.
Get out!First 2 good , 3rd was just dreadful
Return of the Jedi is a garbage film.Back to the Future, Dollars, original Star Wars.
I think the Order of the Pheonix was the weakest one.Which one?
Underrated. Loved it.Taxi.
it isn't a trilogy if there are 5 movies, come on.
Good shout! All I could think of was the obvious ones, LoTR and Star Wars. Back to the Future up there, too.The Bourne Trilogy gets an honourable mention from me.
LOTR unless you hate fantasy.