Racial equality and transgender rights are funny, because you just know a fair portion of the ones who claim they are worse are racists and transphobes.
Maybe funny isn't the right word.
Be a human, do not vote for genocide.
ERROR MESSAGE said:Oops! We ran into some problems.
Sorry, you cannot use the word 'lol' in your message. If it is text speak, please write the word or phrase fully.
I'm not surprised at all, not whilst their is still a Tory government and the man who set up Brexit to fail, is now our Foreign Secretary.
(@Paul the Wolf has swapped opinions with me on this so he will have a different take.)
I am still of the opinion that Cameron, somewhat buoyed by his success in the UK 2015 election, and having seen off the SNP in the Scottish Independence referendum in 2014, thought he would go for the hat-trick and settle (once and for all) the pesky 'anti-EU contingent' in his own party in a 2016 Referendum.
Despite the complexities involved, Cameron wanted a swift (and as he perceived) decisive verdict... hence 'Remain or Leave' were set up as the only two choices, no percentage thresholds to be achieved either way, to ensure realistic result. Hence die was cast and so those who were happy with their lot would tend to vote Remain and those who were unhappy (about anything) would vote Leave, and so it came to pass.
As for a third referendum on this, I cannot imagine any sane UK politician going down this route in the foreseeable future, especially as the EU, up to now have rebuffed any straightforward approaches. However I do see some 'backdoor', maybe even clandestine type attempts to salvage something, especially before the increasingly right-wing leaning governments in a number of EU countries start to flex their muscles. These (if they take place) may transpire a reconciliation result but unless they are successful of course, we shall never know
Also in the future I think Cameron's gamble/expectations on the referendum that eventually delivered Brexit, will in historical terms, equate to the expectations of the appeasement policy and the 'peace in our time' letter Neville Chamberlain brought back from Hitler in the 1930's..... a complete 'c---k up'.
I'm not surprised at all, not whilst their is still a Tory government and the man who set up Brexit to fail, is now our Foreign Secretary.
(@Paul the Wolf has swapped opinions with me on this so he will have a different take.)
I am still of the opinion that Cameron, somewhat buoyed by his success in the UK 2015 election, and having seen off the SNP in the Scottish Independence referendum in 2014, thought he would go for the hat-trick and settle (once and for all) the pesky 'anti-EU contingent' in his own party in a 2016 Referendum.
Despite the complexities involved, Cameron wanted a swift (and as he perceived) decisive verdict... hence 'Remain or Leave' were set up as the only two choices, no percentage thresholds to be achieved either way, to ensure realistic result. Hence die was cast and so those who were happy with their lot would tend to vote Remain and those who were unhappy (about anything) would vote Leave, and so it came to pass.
As for a third referendum on this, I cannot imagine any sane UK politician going down this route in the foreseeable future, especially as the EU, up to now have rebuffed any straightforward approaches. However I do see some 'backdoor', maybe even clandestine type attempts to salvage something, especially before the increasingly right-wing leaning governments in a number of EU countries start to flex their muscles. These (if they take place) may transpire a reconciliation result but unless they are successful of course, we shall never know
Also in the future I think Cameron's gamble/expectations on the referendum that eventually delivered Brexit, will in historical terms, equate to the expectations of the appeasement policy and the 'peace in our time' letter Neville Chamberlain brought back from Hitler in the 1930's..... a complete 'c---k up'.
The Guardian: Keir Starmer expected to push for Palestinian state in Labour manifesto
Labour policy likely to irritate Israel, whose prime minister reacted angrily when Ireland, Spain and Norway officially recognised Palestine in May
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...ected-push-palestinian-state-labour-manifesto
Genuinely don't know whether this is just a briefing, floating an idea, an attempt to shore up the base or a long planned move. Who knows.
The Guardian: Keir Starmer expected to push for Palestinian state in Labour manifesto
Labour policy likely to irritate Israel, whose prime minister reacted angrily when Ireland, Spain and Norway officially recognised Palestine in May
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...ected-push-palestinian-state-labour-manifesto
Genuinely don't know whether this is just a briefing, floating an idea, an attempt to shore up the base or a long planned move. Who knows.
Oh FFS, they are genuinely taking the piss now.
Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, Argentina and Australia had all sold an enormous amount of gold at about the same time - Britain was not alone in this. The rather poor way the UK did it, rather than the act of the UK doing it, is why other countries (with large gold reserves) agreed to limit sales, ie put a floor under the price.
That change to taxation on dividends was first made by Norman Lamont, not Brown. Brown's tax raid cost the pension funds £5bn but what caused them all to close was a £36bn deficit in the fund values - 7x the value of Brown's raid - thanks to the Dotcom crash a couple of years later.
Whether or not the country can afford a typical Labour government should at least be based on the facts of what happened rather than folk memories, no?
Your boring.He's so racist he doesn't even like white English people.
Earlier this yearThe Guardian: Keir Starmer expected to push for Palestinian state in Labour manifesto
Labour policy likely to irritate Israel, whose prime minister reacted angrily when Ireland, Spain and Norway officially recognised Palestine in May
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...ected-push-palestinian-state-labour-manifesto
Genuinely don't know whether this is just a briefing, floating an idea, an attempt to shore up the base or a long planned move. Who knows.
a Palestinian state will be at the bottom of his priority list.The Guardian: Keir Starmer expected to push for Palestinian state in Labour manifesto
Labour policy likely to irritate Israel, whose prime minister reacted angrily when Ireland, Spain and Norway officially recognised Palestine in May
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...ected-push-palestinian-state-labour-manifesto
Genuinely don't know whether this is just a briefing, floating an idea, an attempt to shore up the base or a long planned move. Who knows.
Sunak coming back early from the D day commemoration, to do an interview with ITV (in which he lies about not lying). The flagshaggers in the tories just had their brains exploded.
Are they really though? The Sun and other right wing titles are all still parroting the £2k tax hike figure, which was the intention, and there's minimal coverage of the lying claims in the biggest media outlets. Labour should be fighting back with the Spectator's £3k calculation for what Tory policies would cost and the £13k figure from Sky. Just denying the £2k is making them sound weak, possibly lying and on the backfoot.What goes around comes around. Couldn't happen to a bigger group of pricks.
It's funny, because what the Tories did wasn't even that extreme in political gamesmanship, so hilarious to see them being burnt heavily by it after they betrayed the kinship of politics by exploiting the treasury note joke so they could push through austerity.
Are they really though? The Sun and other right wing titles are all still parroting the £2k tax hike figure, which was the intention, and there's minimal coverage of the lying claims in the biggest media outlets. Labour should be fighting back with the Spectator's £3k calculation for what Tory policies would cost and the £13k figure from Sky. Just denying the £2k is making them sound weak, possibly lying and on the backfoot.
Saying that, Sunak's fecked up leaving the D-Day memorial early. He's getting loads of shit online.
Disaster for Sunak really. It’s exactly the sort of thing he will have wanted to avoid as it ties into the average conservative’s suspicion that he’s out of touch and the gammon racist suspicion that he’s definitely “not one of us” and doesn’t get it at all.
Let's be honest, he's not really a proper white Englishman, and so how can understand things like D Day, after all it was back in the days when it was proper white englishmen who won the war.
As dispiriting as it is seeing the undertone of some of the right wing loons losing their minds over this from sunak. There's some karma in dog whistles bringing him down.