Does Rishi have a slightly wonky eye? Am I imagining that?
General Election 2024
- Thread starter altodevil
- Start date
- Status
Starmer has refused to take part in any debate that involves the other parties.
Sunak has owned starmer really
A clear tactic from Sunak rather than answering questions he's ask his own questions to Starmer instead. It's worked in a quite a few instances even if it's a sly tactic.
This climate debate has been abysmal. Depressing.
Starmer flat out lying about GB Energy being a publicly owned energy generation company. He's simply a con man.
You haven't even got to cite anyone else that it isn't going to be one, he said it himself. Obviously the host couldn't be bothered.
You haven't even got to cite anyone else that it isn't going to be one, he said it himself. Obviously the host couldn't be bothered.
shocking tie knot on Miles
I saw you say this before. If it's investing in new third-party energy generation projects, what's wrong with that?
GB Energy is such a shit concept to campaign on, a bit of a Labour own goal.
Watching love island over the debate because the decision to remove other parties is a disgrace and undemocratic. Neither of these bozos or their parties should be supported purely on that basis.
The small matter of it not being an energy company. He knows exactly what he's doing by calling it one.
If he thought an investment fund would inspire people, he'd call it one. He knows it doesn't but that by calling it an energy company people will assume (wrongly) that it'll be competing with the current ones and bring prices down, when it won't be doing anything of the sort.
Sunak laughed at by the audience over his National Service answer!
It’s very strange to live in a democracy where now everyone agrees the last 14 years have been shite.
If it invests in bringing new supply into the market, surely that would still achieve the same aims?
Agree with you on company vs. investment fund, but that seems like good politics to me.
That shit answer from Starmer on the euros 
God this is wank. fecking awful final speech here from Starmer.
He'll lose votes from that.That shit answer from Starmer on the euros
"The arsonists handed back the matches"
No questions on the welfare state, social housing crisis & homelessness, but time for one about the Euros.
I've changed my mind on Trident, renew it and then launch it at 90 degrees.
I've changed my mind on Trident, renew it and then launch it at 90 degrees.
Has it worked though, it allowed him to dominate the direction of thr debate to an extent but sunak also came across badly and starmer more civilised. Awful format and weak chairing though really
So after that debate my options are either a bland ham sandwich (that might not even be ham) or a Rishi pishy pastie? The ham sandwich looks dodgy, especially with those glasses, but I know for certain that the other one is full of pish so...
Mourdant v Rayner… Friday bring it on
The full interview is worth a watch(Although very bleak) but Labour policy isn’t going to work
All this debate has done has reaffirmed me decision to vote third party or not even bother turning up to the polls. How does the UK constantly churn out these awful drones and ascend them into the highest positions of power?
That Southgate question in the end summed up the whole farce really. Might as well have asked if they think Ten Hag deserves another season.
That Southgate question in the end summed up the whole farce really. Might as well have asked if they think Ten Hag deserves another season.
I thought "ah, a footie question! This is his time to shine" and then he Arsenaled the whole thing.That shit answer from Starmer on the euros
Pretty much spot on. Only problem is the bland ham sandwich could end up being a donkeys scrotum....
What a horrible time to be alive, when the choices for a leader are between wonky eyed spoon eating cnut, that doenst know how to use a bus pass. And a multichinned feckwit in a tight suit, that will have fooled no one by the time the cartoon dog comes along to pull off his mask and reveal the tory he always was.
Pretty bad for Starmer - Sunak made full use of the advantage of just making-up nonsense and repeating it over and over since the format didn't allow for analysis. Plus truth is no longer a factor for the right, and the clear Trump tactic of endlessly interpreting Starmer worked well for him.
Sky News reporting 51-49% in Sunak's favour according to a snap poll - Starmer should be relieved at that IMO.
Sky News reporting 51-49% in Sunak's favour according to a snap poll - Starmer should be relieved at that IMO.
I think Sunak edged that, but he was fighting dirty from the start while Starmer tried to rise above it.
Honestly very disappointed in Starmer - he could have buried the election here and now but fluffed almost every question he had and/or just took too long to get to the point
If he has the answers or correct rebuttals then he needs to be coached better. This is a debate and it's not following a script. Know the points and say them
If he has the answers or correct rebuttals then he needs to be coached better. This is a debate and it's not following a script. Know the points and say them
And this is what was so stupid from Starmer. You knew Sunak would come dirty, rising above it doesn't work. Making them look stupid does, but instead he just fell for it
Starmer looking as bloated as his answers were ponderous. You'd think he'd be able to afford a better fitting suit.
That was the best bit, 'This company spouts a load of absolute bollocks that you shouldn't believe, except this one which makes me look good'
- Status