In my opinion she hasn't got what it takes to win as an independent and I think she knows it too.
It’s pretty simple actually. Not everyone that dislikes Dianne Abbot is racist but Dianne Abbot receives a lot of abuse and disgusting treatment from people that are racist.
Why do i get a funny feeling we might be about to see a 30% polling lead for Labour.
Labour's campaign slogan would be:In theory, could Rishi just resign, and Penny Mourdant take over?
That'd be a massive boost for the Tory cnuts.
Why do i get a funny feeling we might be about to see a 30% polling lead for Labour.
i’ve decided that i’m going to run in the next general election.
For comparison their 2019 predictions at a similar(ish)point:
They actually undersold the Tory majority, it predicted 163 more seats than Labour rather than a 163 seat majority (they actually ended up with 179 more seats than Labour). I wouldn't expect the results will be that drastic but nothing has changed since the campagins started and we're still heading to a very large Labour majority.So they predicted 160 more for conservative but they got 80? doesn't seem very very very implausible their current prediction?
They actually undersold the Tory majority, it predicted 163 more seats than Labour rather than a 163 seat majority (they actually ended up with 179 more seats than Labour). I wouldn't expect the results will be that drastic but nothing has changed since the campagins started and we're still heading to a very large Labour majority.
This is an incredible take down of the "mickey mouse degree" and National Service crap ...by a certain Tory peer
They have told the population they don't want children to reach and achieve their dream of University. They want university for a narrow slice of the population, and the rest of you plebs can "know your place" and serve us in National Service.
I might be in the minority, i don't know how the caf feels, but I am sickened by the idea of universities being solely for employment opportunities. If everyone that wanted/could do the study, could attend university, I do not give two-shits about what the actual degree is. IMO the general "levelling up" of base education university-level is not a bad thing. Yet also in contrast, we should be improving the technical and vocational opportunities for those not wanting to attend university.
The general level of all education, whether academic or technical should be ever increasing for the whole population. Not simply creating classes of deserving and not deserving people.
It'll be interesting to see how much this changes as well:
There's more than one kind of risk to those headline opinion poll leads.
Asked whether he himself thinks Diane Abbott should be a candidate, Cleverly says: "She was a real trailblazer. I don't agree with her politics at all but I think even her harshest critics would say that the way the Labour leadership has treated her has been appalling."
The "dream of university" is the problem.
Far too many people go to university and waste their time and money. It's all become a business - you have to play the game, spend money you don't have to learn non-academic skills, to then get paid dick shit for years in a crap job in which you learn everything as you go anyway.
Far fewer people should be going. It's just another UK cash grab industry. Your 2:2 degree in "digital design" is literally worthless.
And yet there's no money to be had from taking in UK students because the government won't pay for it and also wants to restrict the number of foreign students. Some industry that.
Universities are in part responsible for nearly every good thing that's ever happened, also sometimes the bad. It's the way of learning and the people you meet who are interested in and knowledgeable about such a variety of different things that add the value in a university. It's not just a finishing school for work.
The way they're run and funded is fecking hopeless and they drastically need reform, but their purpose is still just as necessary as it ever was, and having more people experience that wouldn't hurt at all. Vastly more useful than a gap year for most people. They'd be even more useful if there were more year in industry type courses going as well though, and if the academics weren't incentivised to be useless, selfish turds pretending to research things rather than actually teaching people and supporting the students' research.
I slightly disagree with that.The "dream of university" is the problem.
Far too many people go to university and waste their time and money. It's all become a business - you have to play the game, spend money you don't have to learn non-academic skills, to then get paid dick shit for years in a crap job in which you learn everything as you go anyway.
Far fewer people should be going. It's just another UK cash grab industry. Your 2:2 degree in "digital design" is literally worthless.
Most of these courses are worthless and teach nothing. They're a waste of everyone's time. People don't leave more educated, they just leave more disillusioned and poor.
University is of course a wonderful thing, for the right person studying the right thing. But it shouldn't be for most people, and society should rethink itself and realise that isn't negative.
Count Rim Facei’ve decided that i’m going to run in the next general election.
Curious to know what these incentives are. Also curious how academics who don't do research are qualified to supervise students' research.incentivised to be useless, selfish turds pretending to research things rather than actually teaching people and supporting the students' research.
The REF is a major one. It has massive financial implications and does incentivise the producing of research which often does not form teaching materials.Curious to know what these incentives are. Also curious how academics who don't do research are qualified to supervise students' research.
By the way only a fraction of academics are involved in research in most universities.
Starmer:
“I think you win from the centre ground, the centre ground is where most people are. As a nation, broadly speaking we’re a pretty reasonable, tolerant bunch but we are in the centre ground of politics. People don’t like the extremes of the right or the left. They are reasonably tolerant. They want themselves, their families and the country to improve and make progress.”
Stressing his message that he has changed the Labour party, he said you did not have to be a lifelong Labour supporter to be part of his mission. He said “One of the invitations we’ve thrown out is to say we want a decade of national renewal. The national bit is really important to people. This isn’t a tribal Labour. You don’t have to be a lifelong Labour supporter and voter to want to have a decade of national renewal. Very many Tories would want it. I want it to be wide enough to accommodate people who wouldn’t identify as Labour. They’d vote Labour this time.”
Curious to know what these incentives are. Also curious how academics who don't do research are qualified to supervise students' research.
By the way only a fraction of academics are involved in research in most universities.
I'm going to stick a penny on bringing back the death penalty.