Grinner
Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Will he use his mandate to tackle the most important issue which is going after City and their dubious financial cheating?
Fantastic news - I hadn't realised she'd gone too!Yes, and Liam Fox and Therese Coffey.
Or it could be explained by Labour offering absolutely nothing other than being a less corrupt version of the Tories.
Don't be daft. It was 'efficient', apparently.And the low turnout? Was that tactical too?
Not sure it was that open of a goal in the past considering the country's rabid obsession with Brexit, not to mention preceding the sheer corruption and mishandling of the country in the post-covid calamity era of Johnson, Truss and Sunak. They also didn't have the benefit of Reform siphoning away Tory votes in the millions.Well at the very least they’re evidently credible opposition. Taking Tories to task for their terrible record in charge. An open goal that Labour have missed in the past.
Don't be daft. It was 'efficient', apparently.
Agreed.A relief to wake up this morning and see that the predicted 13 seats for Reform didn't come close. Disappointing they got so many votes though.
Pardon my ignorance, but how can you become prime minister this quickly… with no transition period whatsoever? Sure, there are shadows secretaries and so on, but doesn’t the new PM need at least few days to get briefing and conversations with the outgoing PM?
Funny that this decline in votes for Labour is given a free pass as part of a 'Tories Out' election, but the 2019 result where Labour got more votes gets talked about as a disaster caused by Corbyn's leadership rather than it being dominated by the 'Get Brexit Done' rhetoric of the time.This was a kick out the Tories vote.
My guess (at this point, obviously it's too early to know).
In those seats where Labour was best placed to win, Labour picked up Tory votes.
In those seats where Labour could not win, Labour votes went to the Lib dems.
In hardcore Tory seats, the anti Tory vote went to Reform or Lib dems.
Just a guess though.
Was the photo ID requirement a factor at all?
It's what I love about our system. No fecking about whatsoever.Pardon my ignorance, but how can you become prime minister this quickly… with no transition period whatsoever? Sure, there are shadows secretaries and so on, but doesn’t the new PM need at least few days to get briefing and conversations with the outgoing PM?
It will have had an effect, so will the postal votes that didn't make it on time.Was the photo ID requirement a factor at all?
There's stories about people getting turned away and of people with valid commonwealth passports having the names not exactly matching. There's probably also a percentage who didn't have any.
The redtape bypassed? What does that even mean?There's meant to be a process but apparently Starmer just did this and all the red tape was instantly bypassed.
Er, because Labour won? And they won, despite a decline in votes, because they had the right strategy? Which was not the case in 2019?Funny that this decline in votes for Labour is given a free pass as part of a 'Tories Out' election, but the 2019 result where Labour got more votes gets talked about as a disaster caused by Corbyn's leadership rather than it being dominated by the 'Get Brexit Done' rhetoric of the time.
Not even one week for a transition?! That’s not a good system, sorry. The transition in the U.S. is too long (like 10 weeks). Don’t take 10 weeks— but few days at least.It's what I love about our system. No fecking about whatsoever.
Doesn't he have to go to the King and ask for permission to set up a new government? Or has he done that already?The redtape bypassed? What does that even mean?
I mean the guy was a candidate YESTERDAY, and he’s now the Prime Minister? Not even 24 hours.
He met the King today and got the permission, from what I understand.Doesn't he have to go to the King and ask for permission to set up a new government? Or has he done that already?
Fair enough - he best crack on with it then!He met the King today and got the permission, from what I understand.
The opposition party has months of behind-the-scenes transition talks with the civil service in the run up to an (expected) general election.Not even one week for a transition?! That’s not a good system, sorry. The transition in the U.S. is too long (like 10 weeks). Don’t take 10 weeks— but few days at least.
Any way, glad that the Conservatives have lost.
How so? It's basically what they did in 2019 when Farage stood down all his Brexit Party candidates in Tory seats. All they've done is rebadge and show the Tories what could happen when they don't stand down.I think it's going to be interesting to see why turnout was so low. And Reform+Tories=majority is way, way too simplistic.
The transition, such as it is, happens before the election. But we also have the civil service which is there to provide continuity.Not even one week for a transition?! That’s not a good system, sorry. The transition in the U.S. is too long (like 10 weeks). Don’t take 10 weeks— but few days at least.
Any way, glad that the Conservatives have lost.
Not even one week for a transition?! That’s not a good system, sorry. The transition in the U.S. is too long (like 10 weeks). Don’t take 10 weeks— but few days at least.
Any way, glad that the Conservatives have lost.
The Civil service remains in place to keep things ticking over. As head of opposition Starmer would have been receiving ongoing briefings before the election.Pardon my ignorance, but how can you become prime minister this quickly… with no transition period whatsoever? Sure, there are shadows secretaries and so on, but doesn’t the new PM need at least few days to get briefing and conversations with the outgoing PM?
Looking at the vote shares and margins if Farage stood down his candidates like he did in 2019 it would have been a lot closer and Labour wouldn't have won as many seats.I just cannot subscribe to the argument that Labour have somehow been tactically brilliant here by winning the election by a landslide with 36% of the vote at the same time as relying on the public to vote tactically when in reality it’s the Reform vote which has benefited them enormously.
There is just zero logic to it if you give it even the slightest interrogation. Labour are not popular, Starmer is not popular and they’re just huge beneficiaries of the context of this election.
Looking at the vote shares and margins if Farage stood down his candidates like he did in 2019 it would have been a lot closer.
The Civil service remains in place to keep things ticking over. As head of opposition Starmer would have been receiving ongoing briefings before the election.
In the first few days the PM gets some key additional briefings on defence etc, including writing a letter to all submarine commanders to open in the event of Nuclear war breaking out....not sure if Liz Truss ever got round to that one!
Looking at the vote shares and margins if Farage stood down his candidates like he did in 2019 it would have been a lot closer and Labour wouldn't have won as many seats.
Looking at the vote shares and margins if Farage stood down his candidates like he did in 2019 it would have been a lot closer and Labour wouldn't have won as many seats.
Because (a) Labour gets to set the agenda now and they will do all they can to box the tories in - much as Blair did - and (b) because Farage puts off the sort moderate voters the Tories need to get a majority. And (c) if Reform vanished tomorrow, you would not see 100% of their vote break to the Tories. In short, Reform+ Tories is bigger than the current Tories... but such a very right wing Tory party has a ceiling. IMO of course.How so? It's basically what they did in 2019 when Farage stood down all his Brexit Party candidates in Tory seats. All they've done is rebadge and show the Tories what could happen when they don't stand down.
That assumes that all reform votes would have gone tory which is a big reach
They turned up in their thousands, i really don't see them voting Labour, so where else would they feel at home?That's assuming all the votes for Reform would be Conservative usually, which probably isn't the case.