General Election 2017 | Cabinet reshuffle: Hunt re-appointed Health Secretary for record third time

How do you intend to vote in the 2017 General Election if eligible?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 80 14.5%
  • Labour

    Votes: 322 58.4%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 57 10.3%
  • Green

    Votes: 20 3.6%
  • SNP

    Votes: 13 2.4%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 29 5.3%
  • Independent

    Votes: 3 0.5%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 2 0.4%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 11 2.0%
  • Other (UUP, DUP, BNP, and anyone else I have forgotten)

    Votes: 14 2.5%

  • Total voters
    551
  • Poll closed .
Lib Dem vote share on the redcafe poll has declined from 15% to about 11% while the Tory vote has remained fairly flat. Help us bring it back up @RedSky!
 
The YouGov model has been updated.

https://yougov.co.uk/uk-general-election-2017/

Also the final call poll by YouGov for The Times will be out tonight.
Reminds me of the "mysterious powers of excel"
As much as oil and water, our lives are governed by Excel. As you read these lines somewhere in the world, your name is being dragged from cell C25 to D14 on a roster. Such a simple action, yet now you'll be asked to work on your day off. It is useless to protest. The spreadsheet has been printed - the word made mesh.

I still remember looking over a colleague's shoulder at a spreadsheet which had a button in the middle of it. A BUTTON! Raised above the plain of the worksheet like a ziggurat. Instantly I fell to my knees in worship.

Try it now - take some time to play with formulas and Excel will reward you generously, with magic. There are hundreds, from the simple IF, to the rather rude CUMIPMT, all the way to MIRR - the formula for operating a space station.

Of course, Excel will not always reward you. You may have made a mistake in the formula. Your hand may have shaken as you tried to remember if "col_index" was the one on the right or the left.

Excel won't tolerate this. It will send you packing, Worse still you may have a "circular reference" and you will get a lecture. Or you've inserted a chart where everything is zero apart from one thing which is infinity, and Excel will say nothing.

There are many unanswered questions, like what happens if you start everything from cell XFD-1048576? If you summed everything in a spreadsheet, where would you put the answer (ok, in another worksheet).

Excel fans are often treated pejoratively. "'You can't learn this is in a spreadsheet, kid,' said the old man, his weather-beaten face grimacing as he swiftly removed the caribou's entrails" is a line found in many books. But spreadsheets have a beauty all of their own.

They speak to a need deep inside of us to arrange things in rows and columns. Ever since the first town planners pored over drawings of grids in the Indus Valley, man has wanted to locate points by how far over and up they were.

This blimmin model of theirs better be moderately accurate
 
And even those that do understand what the European Parliament is, probably don't know what the council of ministers is (which really should have been it's name). I've had people complain to my face that the EU isn't a democracy because the European Council has all the power... despite members of the European Council or Council of Ministers also being elected.
Ask them the name of their constituency MEP - almost nobody in the UK knows the answer.

But that's for a different thread....

This is a problem with UK elections as well. Very few people can name their local MP (anywhere from 2/3 to 75% based on surveys. Although that number rises to 70% who can recognise their name if presented with it), many people are under the illusion that you vote for who you want as PM as opposed to who you want as your MP, what the civil service does, why it is important to have an indecent judiciary, what bicameral means and so on.

Basically a huge portion of the UK electorate are politically illiterate when it comes to our own political system. Regardless of whether the EU has a democratic deficit or not, the fact that it is both less important to our day to day lives and different has always been an issue.

I'm not sure what the answer is, but the lack of an informed electorate is a huge problem in UK politics and one no seems to want to address.
 
Ask them the name of their constituency MEP - almost nobody in the UK knows the answer.

But that's for a different thread....
Problem with that is we don't have one, we have 10

I could name 2 of mine; Dan Hannan and Nigel Farage. The rest I would struggle with.
 
This is a problem with UK elections as well. Very few people can name their local MP (anywhere from 2/3 to 75% based on surveys. Although that number rises to 70% who can recognise their name if presented with it), many people are under the illusion that you vote for who you want as PM as opposed to who you want as your MP, what the civil service does, why it is important to have an indecent judiciary, what bicameral means and so on.

Basically a huge portion of the UK electorate are politically illiterate when it comes to our own political system. Regardless of whether the EU has a democratic deficit or not, the fact that it is both less important to our day to day lives and different has always been an issue.

I'm not sure what the answer is, but the lack of an informed electorate is a huge problem in UK politics and one no seems to want to address.

Has to be something that you teach kids at GCSE level. But rather than making it a subject that has exams you simply put it together as a Public Skills lesson; Sexual Education, Politics, Basic Economics etc. A lesson which is stress free but allows kids to inform kids of valuable life skills for adult life. That would be a start.
 
Worth pointing out that severe stress can be a pretty debilitating illness of itself.
I said to a friend last night that after seeing her Sky interview I was worried because she looked unwell and I thought the stress had gotten too much for her. About an hour later we saw the reports about Corbyn saying she was indeed not well. It seems the obvious explanation, to me.
 
This is a problem with UK elections as well. Very few people can name their local MP (anywhere from 2/3 to 75% based on surveys. Although that number rises to 70% who can recognise their name if presented with it), many people are under the illusion that you vote for who you want as PM as opposed to who you want as your MP, what the civil service does, why it is important to have an indecent judiciary, what bicameral means and so on.

Basically a huge portion of the UK electorate are politically illiterate when it comes to our own political system. Regardless of whether the EU has a democratic deficit or not, the fact that it is both less important to our day to day lives and different has always been an issue.

I'm not sure what the answer is, but the lack of an informed electorate is a huge problem in UK politics and one no seems to want to address.
I could tell you all three of my local MPs, but couldn't name any opposition candidates.

For the local elections, I spent hours trying to find out information from the government website, but their website wasn't working... Basically voted blind.
 
I could tell you all three of my local MPs, but couldn't name any opposition candidates.

For the local elections, I spent hours trying to find out information from the government website, but their website wasn't working... Basically voted blind.

I turned up at mine having researched the candidates and then realised I lived in a completely different ward to the one I thought I did.
 
I could tell you all three of my local MPs, but couldn't name any opposition candidates.

For the local elections, I spent hours trying to find out information from the government website, but their website wasn't working... Basically voted blind.

I'm similar. I can vote in two constituencies. I know the the name of both incumbent MPs, but not the challengers (although I would recognise the conservative's name and could have a stab at it in one of them).

And thats the other issue. How many people can truly give an accurate breakdown between the roles and responsibilities between the various local councils? I'd say somewhere between zero and five percent of the electorate at most.
 
Are we not going to bother about the speaker, Sinn Fein and all that?
Nah, over-complicates things. Just assume they form part of 'everyone else'. So it's essentially how many seats more than 326 the Tories win, multiplied by two.

Did a quick data analysis, with projected figures for the other parties, looks like people are only on average 10 seats off a realistic majority + Labour seat count. An intelligent bunch, or just luck? Quite interesting to see who is the most accurate out the lot of you though...
 
It's pretty off but only by about 20/30 seats :nervous:

Plus the majority needs to be even...
Duality of the Caf - knows Tories will probably win big, still cannot help but predict Labour will do better.

I've also just remembered that Zac Goldsmith is probably winning his seat back on Friday, urgh.
 
Duality of the Caf - knows Tories will probably win big, still cannot help but predict Labour will do better.

I've also just remembered that Zac Goldsmith is probably winning his seat back on Friday, urgh.
That's exactly it.

Horrible thought that too, slimy bastard.
 
Nah, over-complicates things. Just assume they form part of 'everyone else'. So it's essentially how many seats more than 326 the Tories win, multiplied by two.

Did a quick data analysis, with projected figures for the other parties, looks like people are only on average 10 seats off a realistic majority + Labour seat count. An intelligent bunch, or just luck? Quite interesting to see who is the most accurate out the lot of you though...
Only thing to watch for is that some places will include the speaker in the tories total seat count and some places won't.
 
Suggests a rainbow coalition would be the only way we could form a government...

Blimey.
That would either go really well and usher in a new era of progressive politics...

Or really really really badly.
 
If that yougov forecast turns out to be close tomorrow, will anyone here change their mind about Corbyn?
If he can get in power, I'll be delighted.

He already had changed my mind, because hes donr a lot better. Hes gone from not wanting to use a PMQs to question goverment u turns, because hed rather talk about emergency crisis, to calling her out WWE style
 
Looking like a hung parliament to me. I think I may have even suggested it might be a few weeks back. I remember the day after the election was called I was in a meeting down in London and I suggested to someone that once Davies and May got out in front of the public opinion would shift. Should have put my money where my mouth was...
 
Oohh, that's interesting.Really hope those feelings on security are widespread, I've been worried the attacks would kill off his campaign.
The problem is, the 'undecided' and 'prefer not to says' at the end will probably vote Tory anyway.

They have fears over security and blame May, say Corbyn has impressed them and that he looks more Prime ministerial, yet they don't know who they will vote for. It's odd. If they can't say for sure now how they will vote, I doubt anything said today will be able to convince them.

There might just have been too much negative press for Corbyn making the public hesitant in voting for him.
 
Try and not be optimistic guys, it's going to be a big Tory win.
 
The problem is that only Yougov and Survation show gaps this small. The other polls seem to have an average of 7%-9% gaps. I think it's because (as mentioned here) Yougov is factoring in high youth support for Labour and this is the group which historically votes least. As well as high turn out amongst 65+ for Tories. It'll only be hung parliament territory if the youth actually get out and vote, otherwise landslide territory.
 
The problem is, the 'undecided' and 'prefer not to says' at the end will probably vote Tory anyway.

They have fears over security and blame May, say Corbyn has impressed them and that he looks more Prime ministerial, yet they don't know who they will vote for. It's odd. If they can't say for sure now how they will vote, I doubt anything said today will be able to convince them.

There might just have been too much negative press for Corbyn making the public hesitant in voting for him.

Maybe, but I'm not convinced there's ever been more of a stigma about voting Labour than there has been right now. It's impossible to say which way they will break and we will find out tomorrow.
 
Really tempted to put £50 on 390-419 Conservative seats at 5/1.

The more vitriolic the conversation regarding voting Tory the more shy the Tory support gets. The tone surrounding this election makes the 2015 election look like a vote for Student Union Treasurer; there's people foaming at the mouth to condemn Tory voters as puppy murdering lunatics.

Any Conservative (or even non-Labour) voter that I've seen verbalise or explain their views (particularly on social media) have been harangued as to why they want to see disabled people dying on the streets, why they want the NHS to be privatised, why they want to cause a nuclear holocaust, why they're happy with nurses using food banks, why they're happy to see our Education system collapse and generally why they are detestable human beings.

Simple and evidence-based assertions like "I don't believe that Labour's version of "fully costing" their manifesto is based on a pragmatic economic reality" are met with a torrent of abuse essentially labeling the non-convert a Tory sociopath; even where the person making the statement has not even mentioned who they're voting for.

You'd genuinely think that some of the questioning of Labour policies were akin to someone questioning the reality of the holocaust.
 
Like the look of my Local Labour Candidate. Although she does have a hotmail account.

Its now coin flip between labour and Lib Dems for ny vote
 
Really tempted to put £50 on 390-419 Conservative seats at 5/1.

The more vitriolic the conversation regarding voting Tory the more shy the Tory support gets. The tone surrounding this election makes the 2015 election look like a vote for Student Union Treasurer; there's people foaming at the mouth to condemn Tory voters as puppy murdering lunatics.

Any Conservative (or even non-Labour) voter that I've seen verbalise or explain their views (particularly on social media) have been harangued as to why they want to see disabled people dying on the streets, why they want the NHS to be privatised, why they want to cause a nuclear holocaust, why they're happy with nurses using food banks, why they're happy to see our Education system collapse and generally why they are detestable human beings.

Simple and evidence-based assertions like "I don't believe that Labour's version of "fully costing" their manifesto is based on a pragmatic economic reality" are met with a torrent of abuse essentially labeling the non-convert a Conservative sociopath; even where the person making the statement has not even mentioned who they're voting for.

You'd genuinely think that some of the questioning of Labour policies were akin to someone questioning the reality of the holocaust.

There are plenty of twats on both sides finneh.
 


Pretty much my thoughts on Abbott, hope she takes all the time she needs.
 
Like the look of my Local Labour Candidate. Although she does have a hotmail account.

Its now coin flip between labour and Lib Dems for ny vote
What's your constituency if you don't mind me asking? Are you considering voting tactically?