Gary Neville

I guess that depends on when he came into the consciousness of the fan in question because he came through as a superb crosser of the ball, which was on full display at Euro '96. What was actually strange is that his crossing seemed to decline from its starting point, sort of like how O'Shea looked like he was going to be one of the best dribbling FB's of his era based off his debut season before he really dropped off as a ball-carrying FB.

I don't know if it declined, but I certainly felt it was at his best in his latter years, post Beckham and before the big injury. That's partly why that injury was so cruel. It really finished him when he was at his prime.
 
Can someone please explain the "reborn as a dragon" part, it always cracks me up for some reason :lol:
 
Yeah that is bang on apart from the fact that I have actually started to look at other things when United are playing and I am not kind of basing my whole day around United now
 
Yup, couldn't have said it better. Bored of this football club. We all are, just look at how many people here rejoiced at the three international breaks because it was a break from watching our shower of shite.

I was saying to someone yesterday that if I asked you in the last 10 years how many memorable wins the club has had then I think you could count it on your fingers. Watching sport is about memories & an attachment to those players on the field and I have no happy feelings about this club or any of those on the pitch
 
I feel the same, still can`t stop watching the games but there rarely seems to be any joy at the final whistle. Tiring.
 
He's spot on.

The tiring part is how unnecessary all this is. It doesn't need to be this difficult at a club like United.
 
Has he ever mentioned how poor Rashford is?
 
Talks a lot about Utd here from 11:00 onwards



Very good summary by Gary on United.

The circle of owners, players, managers and the money spent to produce such feeble football.

Just hope SJR can implement the right people and structure that brings back the authority, discipline, winning mentality and courageous football. The 1-0 loss at Newcastle was as bad as the 7-0, if not more, it's a grim long culmination of decay and sheepish players looking beat before a ball is kicked.
 
Last edited:
Gary Neville speaking what all our collective hearts are feeling
 
Very good summary by Gary on United.

The circle of owners, players, managers and the money spent to produce such feeble football.

Just hope SJR can implement the right people and structure that brings back the authority, discipline, winning mentality and courageous football. The 1-0 loss at Newcastle was as bad as the 7-0, if not more, it's a grim long culmination of decay and sheepish players looking beat before a ball is kicked.
I thought we edged the first half vs Liverpool and were unlucky to go in 1-0 down at half time. On Saturday we looked beaten from minute 1.
 
Brilliant by Gary. It's exactly how I feel.
Bored of it.
But I'll tune in again for the next game with hope.
 
Hes spot on and like most of us will watch on Wednesday.

It's the hope that kills you.
 
He’s bang on about the style of play. LVG is the only one who forced the club to actually change regardless of it not working how we wanted and he did that through selling heaps of average players (issue was the players replacing them) but the tactics on the pitch we all saw, we never got hammered, always competitive in big games with quite an average squad in hindsight.

Need to find someone as hands on but much younger who will impose themselves on this group of overpaid chancers.
 
He’s bang on about the style of play. LVG is the only one who forced the club to actually change regardless of it not working how we wanted and he did that through selling heaps of average players (issue was the players replacing them) but the tactics on the pitch we all saw, we never got hammered, always competitive in big games with quite an average squad in hindsight.

Need to find someone as hands on but much younger who will impose themselves on this group of overpaid chancers.
At this point, I'd swap for some boring LvG football at least you could tell there was structure and the manager was getting his ideas through to the players. I think that decision to sack him set us into this doom cycle we're in right now and clearly showed the powers in charge were making it up as they went and still are. My biggest disappointment with ETH is he came in with a similar reputation as LvG but with modern exciting football and has lowered himself to the level of the club. Or worse yet has fallen victim to it.
 
He's rightfully calling Erik out in a respectful manner with his comparison in implementing a style of play despite money being spent. It's actually the first time in a while I can remember that he's been critical in regards of the manager. Overall a good take.
 
He's rightfully calling Erik out in a respectful manner with his comparison in implementing a style of play despite money being spent. It's actually the first time in a while I can remember that he's been critical in regards of the manager. Overall a good take.
You completely missed his point....
 
You completely missed his point....
He definitely did :lol:



“You can play poorly and win but Manchester United have been doing that for a long-time".

“LVG dominated football matches, at Manchester United there was a style of play, Since LVG I don’t think I've seen a pattern of play established”.

What really damages the likes of say ETH and Solskjaer / Jose is they’ve all spent 3-400 million quid but De Zirbi at Brighton and Postecoglou at Spurs and others like them have come in and in three or four months they’ve got them playing like Real Madrid. So that’s the problem they’ve got , it’s been shown that you can come in and have an impact upon players, a pattern of play, a style in three or four months. And we’re still sat here after 8 years and haven’t seen a pattern of play, a combination that you see repeatedly”.

The point is that he's highlighting Erik and previous managers before his time failing to implement their philosophy despite using the club's resources. It's not a lamentation about sacking the manager, but about them failing their responsibility to do something that inevitably leads to them getting sacked.
 
Last edited:


“You can play poorly and win but Manchester United have been doing that for a long-time"
“LVG dominated football matches, at Manchester United there was a style of play, Since LVG I don’t think I've seen a pattern of play established”
What really damages the likes of say ETH and Solskjaer / Jose is they’ve all spent 3-400 million quid but De Zirbi at Brighton and Postecoglou at Spurs and others like them have come in and in three or four months they’ve got them playing like Real Madrid. So that’s the problem they’ve got , it’s been shown that you can come in and have an impact upon players, a pattern of play, a style in three or four months. And we’re still sat here after 8 years and haven’t seen a pattern of play, a combination that you see repeatedly”.

The point is that he's highlighting Erik and previous managers before his time failing to implement their philosophy despite using the club's resources. It's not a lamentation about sacking the manager, but about them failing their responsibility to do something that inevitably leads to them getting sacked.

Hes highlighting the problem lies outside of the manager, and he's said this lots of times. Most of his podcasts when talking about United is dedicated to the shit ownership and lack of structure. He talks of money spent as an indictment on them.
 
Hes highlighting the problem lies outside of the manager, and he's said this lots of times. Most of his podcasts when talking about United is dedicated to the shit ownership and lack of structure. He talks of money spent as an indictment on them.

He speaks well to the wider issue but those quotes and 4 mins within this segment specifically implicate the managers responsibility.
 
He speaks well to the wider issue but those quotes and 4 mins within this segment specifically implicate the managers responsibility.
Yes, but I don't think you can take it in isolation and ignore the wider context. I think he's trying to say other clubs can have no problem implementing a style but regardless of which type of manager you bring in at United, they can't. And then he speaks about the bigger picture problems which is the root of it all.
 


“You can play poorly and win but Manchester United have been doing that for a long-time".

“LVG dominated football matches, at Manchester United there was a style of play, Since LVG I don’t think I've seen a pattern of play established”.

What really damages the likes of say ETH and Solskjaer / Jose is they’ve all spent 3-400 million quid but De Zirbi at Brighton and Postecoglou at Spurs and others like them have come in and in three or four months they’ve got them playing like Real Madrid. So that’s the problem they’ve got , it’s been shown that you can come in and have an impact upon players, a pattern of play, a style in three or four months. And we’re still sat here after 8 years and haven’t seen a pattern of play, a combination that you see repeatedly”.

The point is that he's highlighting Erik and previous managers before his time failing to implement their philosophy despite using the club's resources. It's not a lamentation about sacking the manager, but about them failing their responsibility to do something that inevitably leads to them getting sacked.

Its also spot on. None of these managers should have been given so much freedom on signings, especially ETH who seemed to be the only decision maker. But its the inability to make more of what you have that is the biggest failing, especially for ETH who was supposed to be a proper coach. Where is any evidence of that????
 
I completely agree with @Cult of Personality and think ultimately it all comes from the club being run as a profit making business rather than a football club. It's attracting agents and footballers with the same attitude. Hopefully @Cult of Personality is right and things change when Ineos get control of sporting decisions
 
I can't believe that the Mayor of Bury (Gary Neville one day M.P.) has only just realised the club's priority has been the commercial side. It has been for years even when SAF and David Gill were at OT. Difference between then and now is the Board which has been full of brown nosing clowns that know very little about football. Neville is dead for me because he can't resist bringing his politics into his sports commentary. Taking the knee for instance (what's happened to that?). He claimed that Boris, of whom I am not a fan, was condoning racism because he wouldn't condemn fans that booed players taking the knee. In fact it was a 'spokesman' from the Government that said ' The PM respects the right for people to peacefully protest' and added ' The PM wants everybody to get behind the team and cheer them on and not boo'. Contradictory statements but if he had condemned the booing, someone would be piping up about the right to protest. Neville's take was 'PM promoting racism' which was wrong. BLM turns out to be a bunch of frauds in it for the money. Neville has been quite on that.
 
I can't believe that the Mayor of Bury (Gary Neville one day M.P.) has only just realised the club's priority has been the commercial side. It has been for years even when SAF and David Gill were at OT. Difference between then and now is the Board which has been full of brown nosing clowns that know very little about football. Neville is dead for me because he can't resist bringing his politics into his sports commentary. Taking the knee for instance (what's happened to that?). He claimed that Boris, of whom I am not a fan, was condoning racism because he wouldn't condemn fans that booed players taking the knee. In fact it was a 'spokesman' from the Government that said ' The PM respects the right for people to peacefully protest' and added ' The PM wants everybody to get behind the team and cheer them on and not boo'. Contradictory statements but if he had condemned the booing, someone would be piping up about the right to protest. Neville's take was 'PM promoting racism' which was wrong. BLM turns out to be a bunch of frauds in it for the money. Neville has been quite on that.
You’ve been hanging on to this for a long time. Seems like you may be a bit of Johnson fan if you felt the need to write such a long post defending him.

BLM the movement does not equal BLM the group.
 


40.00 minute. Biggest and most open public dig at players. Him and others openly saying who is not good enough. Manager is safe though. Gary never hits out at any manager which is stupid. If you can openly bash players then you can at least criticize managers.
Btw; good episode. Worth watching.