Welcome onboard brother!I think he may have truly fecked up this time actually. Time will tell
Welcome onboard brother!I think he may have truly fecked up this time actually. Time will tell
Yet won nothing…
Definitely move into a senior role at the FA. He knows full well he’s a shit Manager and he will be offered a lucrative role within the FA which he can bimble along with for 30 years.It will be interesting to see what he ends up doing after he is done with England.
Do you think he will go back to club management after decades of not having done it? I can't see too many big clubs being keen. Or will he perhaps take some higher-up administrative position in the FA?
It will be interesting to see what he ends up doing after he is done with England.
Do you think he will go back to club management after decades of not having done it? I can't see too many big clubs being keen. Or will he perhaps take some higher-up administrative position in the FA?
I refuse to believe they considered him. I think journalists made a lazy assumption cause fo the Ashworth links.INEOS are you watching..???
From a United perspective, surely these England performances couldn't be going much better...you'd hope..!!
World class team with a Sunday League manager. I said from the beginning that England had that one good tournament as a one off. What a waste
Send him to City as punishment for the 115 charges. Kicked out of the football pyramid or Southgate as manager for next 10 years. Their choice.This is definitely Gareth Southgate's last run out as England manager, the worry is where he goes next?
But also his line ups. When I saw the line up for the first game I knew this would not fly. Thank god I'm not English, I would be so pissed to have an incompetent manager wastes an amazing opportunity and a top squadYup, tell me when was the last time you've seen a professional club manager make a sub change to the entire Frontline at one go??? Only happens in Sunday league and club friendlies. Laughable really.
Correct, but that was the case for the majority of none elite teams. Team like France, Spain, Germany and Brazil at their peak were unplayable. It's one thing to be pragmatic if you know you have limitations, but if you're full of talent you go out and bully teams into submission. For some reason that has never happened with England, and I personally rate the Rio, Terry, Lampard, Gerrard, Cole, Rooney generation much higher than the current one. The approach with England never changes, it's always cautious with managers trying fit in the big names even if it's not working. Southgate lacks the mentality and the skill to coach this team into dominating anyone. England might still win something under him because it's a cup competition after all, but he's out of his depth.Something that has been bugging me and kinda just occurred to me is that there has been a real paradigm shift in international football with teams playing more expansive, attacking football bringing it inline with club football.
So while it is well trodden ground that Southgate has one of the best attacks in the competition, he is choosing to play international football as it was played a decade ago at a time where it wouldn’t be considered naive to opt to take the breaks off and try to win games 3-1 or 4-2 rather than 1-0.
Send him to City as punishment for the 115 charges. Kicked out of the football pyramid or Southgate as manager for next 10 years. Their choice.
He's totally fecked it this time though, sadly for England. Even the players look like they know it, add on the Kalvin Phillips comments and they must be close to packing their bags in advance.
I think the paradigm shift @Pexbo mentions still is visible, but I agree with you that it's not necessarily applicable to England.Correct, but that was the case for the majority of none elite teams. Team like France, Spain, Germany and Brazil at their peak were unplayable. It's one thing to be pragmatic if you know you have limitations, but if you're full of talent you go out and bully teams into submission. For some reason that has never happened with England, and I personally rate the Rio, Terry, Lampard, Gerrard, Cole, Rooney generation much higher than the current one. The approach with England never changes, it's always cautious with managers trying fit in the big names even if it's not working. Southgate lacks the mentality and the skill to coach this team into dominating anyone. England might still win something under him because it's a cup competition after all, but he's out of his depth.
Send him to City as punishment for the 115 charges. Kicked out of the football pyramid or Southgate as manager for next 10 years. Their choice.
Henderson should have been in the squad and first eleven. That kind of experience is vital. He is a leader and would help the team. Instantly. That is on Southgate. I find it bizarre that he said that they have been trying to find solution in that position for 7-8 years and without Rice he don't know where they would have been. I often understand managers and know they have it hard but I have to question his knowledge of how a midfielder should play and what is good quality. He could have taken Henderson, Prowse and even Barkley and improved that central midfield position.The Phillips and Henderson comments were really bizarre.
It give me McFred shivers.
Rice is better as an 8, Bellingham, Foden, Palmer are all better as 10s, so it is a tough on from hat perspective.
England don’t actually have a proper 6 and maybe that’s what is was grasping to say? Phillips as the example is just pure panic though.
Panicking and playing a full back there without the agility, close control or space awareness to play in midfield probably highlights just how lost he is.
Mainoo or Wharton with Rice and Gordon on for Foden is probably their best chance at a natural shape.
People do get confused between a 6 and 8. A 6 doesn't mean they sit and protect the back 4, because Rice is actually a top class 6 when we are in a low block, he senses danger, he covers the CB really well.
Also, Rice is a very good 8 when we press because he is a ball winner, he knows how to press, we saw yesterday when he pressed high and won the ball back.
What he needs is someone in midfield who understands the midfield role, come in Wharton and MAinoo. Mainoo has played both the 6 and 8 for United this season, so I dont get why Southgate would play a RB rather than CM in there.
Henderson should have been in the squad and first eleven. That kind of experience is vital. He is a leader and would help the team. Instantly. That is on Southgate. I find it bizarre that he said that they have been trying to find solution in that position for 7-8 years and without Rice he don't know where they would have been. I often understand managers and know they have it hard but I have to question his knowledge of how a midfielder should play and what is good quality. He could have taken Henderson, Prowse and even Barkley and improved that central midfield position.
Doesn't want him injured for when he starts as United manager next month.Has Southgate been asked why he's not playing Mainoo? I'm confused why he's not the answer.
Some things should not be joked about.Doesn't want him injured for when he starts as United manager next month.
I think back to us knocking Germany out of Euro 2020/1. We outplayed Germany, and the majority said it was more to do with Germany being awful, which, okay, but you compare us two then to now where they're looking like one of the favourites and it's night and day. What's changed?Something that has been bugging me and kinda just occurred to me is that there has been a real paradigm shift in international football with teams playing more expansive, attacking football bringing it inline with club football.
So while it is well trodden ground that Southgate has one of the best attacks in the competition, he is choosing to play international football as it was played a decade ago at a time where it wouldn’t be considered naive to opt to take the breaks off and try to win games 3-1 or 4-2 rather than 1-0.
Rice is better as an 8, Bellingham, Foden, Palmer are all better as 10s, so it is a tough on from hat perspective.
England don’t actually have a proper 6 and maybe that’s what is was grasping to say? Phillips as the example is just pure panic though.
Panicking and playing a full back there without the agility, close control or space awareness to play in midfield probably highlights just how lost he is.
Mainoo or Wharton with Rice and Gordon on for Foden is probably their best chance at a natural shape.
Bowen, Gallagher and Eze looked comically out of their depth to my eyes.
People talk about this squad as if it was 1970 Brazil and I don't see it personally. Are we really 'stacked with talent' on the left side, at CB, GK and CM? ST depth is also weak - Watkins and Toney are solid but no way world class.
If that was his concern wouldn't the obvious solution be to use Stones as a defensive midfielder, given he's actually played there often for City? Rather than Arnold who's barely ever played there? Konsa Guehi as a CB pairing would be fine with Stones in front as DM.
It's not what I would do personally but if that's what he sees as the issue it seems like an obvious solution to me. But I think he's probably just making up excuses as it doesn't even make sense in the first place.
I don’t think Southgate could coach those kind of setups and, as with Trent, moving into midfield is very different from actually playing there. But I agree, a set up that allowed Stones to do that would be ideal as it’s a very special skill.
His big mistake was not preparing for this scenario years ago. Sticking with players and not thinking forward to what the future could look like for England.
Calling the Trent in midfield setup an “experiment” is outrageous two games into a major tournament.