Falcao

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hernandez's style of play isn't suited to how the team are headed, though. He's a poacher first and foremost and thrives on crosses into the box. When he's played at the head of a 4-5-1 formation, he's painfully out of his depth. I really like Hernandez and hope we don't get rid either, but Berbatov got the chop for not suiting our new vision of football and there's no reason why Hernandez couldn't meet the same fate.

Hernandez would have scored some goals in our 1999 side with the service from Giggs and Beckham. In terms of poachers, he's among the world's best, but other than that, his all-round game isn't, I'm afraid. The thing with Hernandez is that he's such a likeable lad and people don't like to criticise him, but we have to be subjective here.
 
Wow, I thought he was 15 Million Pounds max, but maybe I'm underrating him. He may very well score freely at Atletico, so 20 Million is not a bad shout after all. I'd have thought Nani is more marketable than Chicarito.

Well anyway, if we are signing Falcao and letting Chicarito go, will Falcao be happy on our bench, what with Chicarito only playing very few games this season.

What makes you think falcao would sit on our bench? There's no chance that in the scenario we actually got him, that he wouldn't be an automatic first choice.

I feel like most of the people here don't watch him that often if they're seriously suggesting he wouldn't get in our first team easily, because over the past few years he's been arguably the best striker in the world. People are also getting this idea that he is just a poacher like Hernandez, but in reality, he can score basically any time of goal. He is basically the most complete number 9 in world football at the moment and he would walk into any side.
 
Wow.. I wouldn't sell the Chic for 20 squidders, yet you bawk at him being worth that? Do I overrate him or do you underrate?

Does 47m seem fair Falcao?
Comparing his age/profile/price against RVP...

Considering he's arguably the best striker in the world, got plenty of years left in his prime, was never known as an injury prone player, and got a few years left on his contract compared to the one rvp had. Also, falcao never said which club he wants to sign for yet, unlike rvp. Atletico will have every top team around the world fighting for his signature so his price will naturally be high.
 
Would be madness to sell Chicarito the lad is going to be a legend by the end of his career but to be honest I don't think Fergie is high on him anymore for whatever reason. He is determined to shove RVP down everyones throat until he starts scoring again even know he has already done enough this season to warrant his purchase. Because of this and Fergies insistence in playing Welbeck Hernandez has been left out far too much.
 
If Fergie were to let one of Rooney or Hernandez go, I think it would Rooney that he would let go.
 
How annoying is Guillem Balague? After his tweet yesterday he comes out with this vague bullshit today:

On Falcao and Manchester United (don't look for certainties, only one)
For those of you who are looking for certitudes, for black or whites, for ‘never mind negotiations, is he definitively going?’, stop reading here because nothing is definitive in this saga yet.

The story comes from Madrid. Manchester United, I have been told, have paid an advance figure (which varies depending who you ask) for Falcao. That would mean that they are willing to pay 60 million euros for him. All that money for one player? That is the part that I cannot comprehend.

If it is true that they have made an advance payment like they did with De Gea, it means that they will almost certainly get the player. Do Manchester United need another striker? It is becoming obvious by the day that they are selling Wayne Rooney, but will anybody buy? Madrid and Barcelona are not interested. Not many other options left, and they are all in England: Chelsea, City? So they will need to sell Rooney to follow up that payment with the rest of the huge fee.

To complicate matters, Real Madrid have set eyes on two players and the media will start the saga as soon as they get KOd from the Champions League (or win it): Gareth Bale and Kun Agüero. If Kun goes, then there is a space open for Rooney, but there are lots of bridges to cross before we get there.

So, the only certitude is that from the Spanish club the leak is that Manchester Unite have made a payment for Falcao. Are they trying to push for a deal, are they trying to warn other potential suitors (Chelsea and PSG, mainly. City are not looking to replace Agüero… if they convince him to stay)

We are at that stage of the season where, yes, annoying I know, but anything can happen still
 
I think its clear for all to see that this story has legs, but whether they will get up and start running is a different matter.

Looks like Gill may have left the keys behind to that famous warchest as a goodbye present after all.
 
I don't get why people constantly use these transfers as a basis really. They're clearly exceptional cases where all logic went out the window and should not be used as a comparison to how much other players are worth.

Hear, hear. A Russian billionaire impulsively buying a new toy, and Kenny Daglish disavowing his ancestry, shouldn't be a standard of comparison.


Maybe I'm a Nani sympathiser, but I think you are vastly underrating him (like I'm with Chicarito maybe?) The lad had a storming season last year, this year he was originally out of favour due to his contract demands and then injuries and loss of form. Last year, he was surely the best winger in the league including Bale and on form, I think he's better than Bale.

Of course, it's my opinion and counts for nothing.

I read that as 'Nazi sympathiser' and thought "Pretty brave on the Cafe - that's a ban right there!"

If Falcao does come, I hope it's to replace Rooney and not Hernandez. Falcao/Rooney/Rvp could be another train wreck in the making, like Tevez/Rooney/Berbatov. Play them together for one game, and then sit a world-class player on the bench - who walks at the end of the season for low money. Surely Fergie has learned his lesson, and won't repeat that mistake?
 
I haven't lasted past the first minute yet. That scissors-kick and the goal against Barcelona are fecking wank worthy.

The thing i like about him is every goal is different, he scores such a variety of goals its quite amazing.

That volley he controls on his chest and volleys backwards is absolutely beautiful, reminds of me Ronaldinho's goal.
 
I have no idea what point you are trying to make, but simply put - Hernandez is not better than Benzema and Higuain.

You seem to think Benzema and Higuain are definitely worth over £30m but Hernandez isn't, in reality there's not much between the three of them.

The fact that Hernandez has started less games yet scored more goals should count in his favour surely, not be used as a stick to beat him with.

For the record I don't think any of them are worth £30m but then again I wouldn't say Falcao is worth £10m more than any of them. Doesn't matter what we think he's worth, he's worth whatever the buying club are willing to part with. At a club like PSG or Chelsea he could be just what they need, they have bundles of creativity but arguably need someone more clinical to finish off all the chances they create or just give them a different option in attack.
 
We don't need Falcao.

Said every poster last season about Van Persie, and look what he has done for us this season.

We could always use a world class player.

If we had to move Rooney or Nani, I would move either one of them for Falcao as he is better than both of them.

Adding Falcao and a CM would be a spectacular summer for us. I hope it happens.
 
Every time I've seen Falcao play this season (admittedly that hasn't been very often) I've thought he's world class, probably a shade better than RvP in the out and out striker role.

If we signed him and played RvP off him, we'd have the best strike force in the world. He is also a player who would improve City or Chelsea by a ridiculous amount. Who'd want to play against City with Aguero and Falcao up front? Or Chelsea with Hazard, Oscar, Mata off him?

I'd be sad if Hernandez leaves, but he deserves to play regular football.
 
Yeah yeah he seems to have some amazing goals and that but none of those are against Stoke away on a cold tuesday night and I shall reserve my judgement until I see that happen.
 
Yeah yeah he seems to have some amazing goals and that but none of those are against Stoke away on a cold tuesday night and I shall reserve my judgement until I see that happen.

Ridiculous post.

Aguerro didn't score against Stoke on a Tuesday night either while he was banging them in for AM.
 
I bet everyone will now be watching the Athletico Madrid games from until the end of the season.
 
They will want an absurd amount, seeing as he's 3rd party owned by an investment group closely linked to his agent Mendes. £55m is the buyout clause in his contract so that's the max they can get. Not much profit considering he was bought for €40m and has developed into the best striker on the planet.

His father already said last year that Falcao's dream is to play for Real Madrid.
 
The man is a technical finisher but I can't figure out why at 27 we now have an eye for him? I might have missed the hype wagon but why wasn't his name thrown around when Ronnie left? Is this a breakout year for him or has he always been this good?
 
It seems Fergie is desperate to win the champs league one more time before he retires and feels with RVP and Falcao we have better chance of winning it.
 
And what is your assessment of him, is he worth £40m?

Based on his form in 2011 through all of 2012, easily. He's gone quiet this year at the same time atletico look to be going through a bit of a slump. If he's not getting the service he tends to disappear. I think Simeone likes to keep him forward rather than tracking back and helping start attacks. He would thrive in every big club, as he's usually lethal when given a chance.
 
I don't think he's the sort of player we should be after but it makes sense since City and Chelsea are going after a striker. If the team strenghten itself with Falcao it's only a good thing. City and Chelsea both would benefit greatly of having him. Besides him there aren't that many options for those teams to better themselves greatly. Cavani perhaps.

I wouldn't mind a Falcao-RvP partnership. Wouldn't mind that without the thought of Rooney leaving. I think we can pull that off. That would mean a different style of play for the most part which isn't too bad since there aren't as many wingers coming through the youth ranks as there was in the olden SAF days.

That's as much as I have to say about that as this is only a rumour.
 
I don't think he's the sort of player we should be after but it makes sense since City and Chelsea are going after a striker. If the team strenghten itself with Falcao it's only a good thing. City and Chelsea both would benefit greatly of having him. Besides him there aren't that many options for those teams to better themselves greatly. Cavani perhaps.

I wouldn't mind a Falcao-RvP partnership. Wouldn't mind that without the thought of Rooney leaving. I think we can pull that off. That would mean a different style of play for the most part which isn't too bad since there aren't as many wingers coming through the youth ranks as there was in the olden SAF days.
That's as much as I have to say about that as this is only a rumour.

Curious remark. How many wingers did we produce in the 'olden SAF days'?

And we've signed Zaha, not forgetting Januszaj who's capable of playing wide
 
Based on his form in 2011 through all of 2012, easily. He's gone quiet this year at the same time atletico look to be going through a bit of a slump. If he's not getting the service he tends to disappear. I think Simeone likes to keep him forward rather than tracking back and helping start attacks. He would thrive in every big club, as he's usually lethal when given a chance.

In that case we need to sort our wingers if we want Falcao to be productive in front of goal, and i'm not even gonna mention our midfield.
 
Curious remark. How many wingers did we produce in the 'olden SAF days'?

And we've signed Zaha, not forgetting Januszaj who's capable of playing wide

I'm talking about in football in general. Not exclusively youth product from Manchester United.
 
I'm talking about in football in general. Not exclusively youth product from Manchester United.

That's because teams use them differently these days. Look at Mata, Bale, Ronaldo who all started as wingers but are used as Wing forwards/AM's/False wingers these days.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.