If she has a problem with the stories about her in the media why doesn't she sue them for being libellous as well? Unless it is true and she did shag a player. In which case, she was rightfully removed.
Who acted under the request of Mourinho, because he's the main man when it comes to all things football related.
Mourinho doesn't have a fraction of Fergusons control at Chelsea. He doesn't even get to choose his own signings any more. The fact that he doesn't get to choose his own playing staff makes me believe he has little control over the medical team (Which is out of a managers power to begin with).
How does she win? There is nothing to win here. She is out of a job now, potentially cut a few ties in football and earned a couple million. Not going to hurt the club in any way.
Mourinho damaging her reputation publicly in interviews is an issue she can take to court certainly.
So her case is that we breached her contract when we took her off match day duties.
I would sack people over this. Starting with the Russian lady who became Chief Executive. Not only will it piss off the feminist groups that jumped all over this case but I also don't like her either.
No I haven't. Eva Carneiro isn't representative of the world. She is just an opportunistic lady who wants millions for jack shit. Why should I take the side of somebody like that? And why does it mean I fell for Mourinhos antics (Which aren't antics. They are just him whinging because he has no control).
I could do that. Throw out the same team each week, watch them lose and sarcastically congratulate the ref. In the interview after the game lose my shit and start insulting everybody. Sometimes ill mix it up and headbutt the reporter for added effect, or maybe get into am argument and have a fan banned for life because she isn't cheering loud enough (Must be a woman to add the sex case into it).
I do. It's a debate on whether taking her off match day duties is considered a serious breach of contract.
I was taking the piss mate. Just like I wouldn't actually want Abramovich to have her killed.
Some of the stories were a complete invasion of her privacy if I remember correctly. You're just being silly saying that
Stories saying I was great in bed and liked a good shag? I would be fine with those. Its the stories that make me sound bad that I wouldn't be fine about.
Of course the courts will. That doesn't change the fact that she is likely doing so just for the money and not because she felt mistreated or anything.
I have no doubt either that sue resigned because she was made aware that she could make more money from it then she would if she continued working for Chelsea. She is being opportunistic and yet everybody is treating her like some poor little victim.
I don't believe that for a second. Just this week there were Journos on 5live talking about how much control Mourinho has at Chelsea.
It's not opportunistic to refuse to work in hostile and professionally and personally damaging work environment.
He really doesn't have much control. Like I said, he doesn't even know any of his signings.
Yeah, Chelsea and Mourinho fecked up. I wont defend what he did, it was shitty. I still wont fall in line saying how great she is for resigning and then sueing her former employer.
I think you have to ask questions about how a woman of her age is unmarried and childless at that age. What do you think her masterplan here is? Trick Abramovich into getting her up the duff and then force him to marry her? Or something even more dishonest?
