Adisa
likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
The club better realise this.He wont be able to do anything with these braindead players
The club better realise this.He wont be able to do anything with these braindead players
He is hot commodity, 83-14 is high octane.The only reason they aren't running away with it is because PSV are doing very well too. Ajax have won 22 of 28 games, drawn and lost 3 times. They have scored 83 goals and conceded only 14 in their league. Whilst their early exit in the CL was disappointing, if you watched that game, it was the literal definition of a smash and grab, Ajax were all over Benfica. This Ajax team under Ten Hag is far from underwhelming.
If the board does what you're saying, then we're in trouble. But I don't believe they will do that, and i'll explain my reasoning below.Well I hope so. Although I don't trust the board and owners so I wouldn't be saying that just yet. Board could easily say to Ten Hag no your not selling Rashford even though he doesn't want him.
One these three isnt like the other.Ten Hag, Van Persie and Rio.
what a team
The only reason they aren't running away with it is because PSV are doing very well too. Ajax have won 22 of 28 games, drawn and lost 3 times. They have scored 83 goals and conceded only 14 in their league. Whilst their early exit in the CL was disappointing, if you watched that game, it was the literal definition of a smash and grab, Ajax were all over Benfica. This Ajax team under Ten Hag is far from underwhelming.
One person can change a lot.
You can just look at Liverpool. Or Atletico for that matter.
They were in more dire situation than we are now. We have a far better squad than they did when Klopp/Simeone came in. They do not spend more money than United.
Once you have a clear identity, the recruitment becomes easier and clearer etc.
Very excited to see what lies in the future. Ten Hag is the man. He just needs 2-3 years to clear the squad, instill his philosophy and system.
I actually think we would be quite decent right away.
Ah I read your post as saying that ETH should be given the role of head coach whereas Klopp and Pep are managers.That's why Klopp is the Head coach and not manager. The recruitment is controlled by Edwards and the team working under him. Guardiola the same with a recruitment department taking care of recruitment. They don't have their personal recruitment staff like Mourinho and Ole had during their tenures, hence both being managers.
We've changed our stance because we're going into a new season with a DoF who is leading the search for a head coach.
Where they? LIverpool were just a year and a half on from nearly winning the league. We are comfortably not a top four side. Think people underestimate the work that needs doing.One person can change a lot.
You can just look at Liverpool. Or Atletico for that matter.
They were in more dire situation than we are now. We have a far better squad than they did when Klopp/Simeone came in. They do not spend more money than United.
Once you have a clear identity, the recruitment becomes easier and clearer etc.
Very excited to see what lies in the future. Ten Hag is the man. He just needs 2-3 years to clear the squad, instill his philosophy and system.
I actually think we would be quite decent right away.
I was thinking about just this earlier. BUT you look at the actual state of the Liverpool squad that Klopp inherited. They lost their two best players in Suarez and Sterling. Their defence was an absolute shambles as was their keeper.Where they? LIverpool were just a year and a half on from nearly winning the league. We are comfortably not a top four side. Think people underestimate the work that needs doing.
Where they? LIverpool were just a year and a half on from nearly winning the league. We are comfortably not a top four side. Think people underestimate the work that needs doing.
Seems like a lot of years have been wasted though… if it takes another 2-3 years with ten Hag that’s a long long time without challenging and winning proper trophies. If we’d of picked the correct manager to start with and backed him then we may be in a different situation right now. If ten Hag comes in and wins a trophy in the first season then it buys him more time to get the squad he needs and start challenging. Think because a lot of the fans and the board want Instant success there not going to give him the time he needs.One person can change a lot.
You can just look at Liverpool. Or Atletico for that matter.
They were in more dire situation than we are now. We have a far better squad than they did when Klopp/Simeone came in. They do not spend more money than United.
Once you have a clear identity, the recruitment becomes easier and clearer etc.
Very excited to see what lies in the future. Ten Hag is the man. He just needs 2-3 years to clear the squad, instill his philosophy and system.
I actually think we would be quite decent right away.
You did day it was 'widely reported'. So it would be fair to say you're embellishing though I'm not sure that's the correct term since you've provided no evidence to support your statement
Oooof 0-3 down as well. Good shout!PSV will come back, a draw at least.
That's why I said not sure it's true or not.
I was conceding the point to you, take the win
And we were second last season...plus EL final.LIverpool were just a year and a half on from nearly winning the league.
Seems like a lot of years have been wasted though… if it takes another 2-3 years with ten Hag that’s a long long time without challenging and winning proper trophies. If we’d of picked the correct manager to start with and backed him then we may be in a different situation right now. If ten Hag comes in and wins a trophy in the first season then it buys him more time to get the squad he needs and start challenging. Think because a lot of the fans and the board want Instant success there not going to give him the time he needs.
This is a great read. Thanks for sharing.https://medium.com/@georgelw/erik-ten-hag-d12d8f16f5b2. Very long and detailed article about ETH, pretty much every aspect about him covered with data..
You can tell I really haven’t seen much of Ajax this season. The stats you say make me a lot more exited then. PSG must be having a fantastic season to even partially keep pace with a side that has won that many games.The only reason they aren't running away with it is because PSV are doing very well too. Ajax have won 22 of 28 games, drawn and lost 3 times. They have scored 83 goals and conceded only 14 in their league. Whilst their early exit in the CL was disappointing, if you watched that game, it was the literal definition of a smash and grab, Ajax were all over Benfica. This Ajax team under Ten Hag is far from underwhelming.
One person can change a lot.
You can just look at Liverpool. Or Atletico for that matter.
They were in more dire situation than we are now. We have a far better squad than they did when Klopp/Simeone came in. They do not spend more money than United.
Once you have a clear identity, the recruitment becomes easier and clearer etc.
Very excited to see what lies in the future. Ten Hag is the man. He just needs 2-3 years to clear the squad, instill his philosophy and system.
I actually think we would be quite decent right away.
I was just going to say that. They nearly won the league before Klopp. And he was an appointment that built on the previous regime rather than being a shift. We haven't challenged let alone come close to winning in 9 years. People love putting it all on individuals and of course hiring a quality manager can change a lot. But we have have be fair to Liverpools owners too - they have been getting a lot right. With Rodgers they played fantastic football before things went wrong and under Klopp their transfer committee has worked wonders (while Klopp has coached excellently too of course). I think as much as they are happy / lucky to have him, Klopp has also picked well as Liverpool are very well run.Where they? LIverpool were just a year and a half on from nearly winning the league. We are comfortably not a top four side. Think people underestimate the work that needs doing.
I just hope our fans give ten Hag time. We are effectively starting from scratch after years of ineptitude and carelessness. I wouldn’t expect a top 4 finish next season. Maybe the one after that.
Also…hopefully the board realise that we don’t need big name players. Just the right ones.
Agreed… top 4 is bare minimum that we must achieve. That will at least keep the manager and gives him more time to develop the squad. The year after that should be a proper title challenge. Getting top 4 next season will be an improvement on this season anyway as we’re looking unlikely to miss top 4 this year. When the new manager comes in it’s all about improving all the time and progressing.Man fans on here thinks we are spurs or Arsenal or something. If we don't get top four next season, that should immediately sack our manager. There is no excuse that we don't get top four, especially with the squad we have. Even Ole had us dreaming of a title challenge earlier this season. No way, standards has dropped so low in such a short amount of time
Looking at the data, we are now the new Arsenalhttps://medium.com/@georgelw/erik-ten-hag-d12d8f16f5b2. Very long and detailed article about ETH, pretty much every aspect about him covered with data..
I'd still expect a top 4 finish. We have the quality and resources. However I wouldn't say it's the be all and end all. If the football is developing well the manager can stay even if he finishes outside the top 4. I would that this combination is a rarity given how poor the 4th placed team tends to be.I just hope our fans give ten Hag time. We are effectively starting from scratch after years of ineptitude and carelessness. I wouldn’t expect a top 4 finish next season. Maybe the one after that.
Also…hopefully the board realise that we don’t need big name players. Just the right ones.
People have forgotten they had Rickie Lambert and Borini in attack.And we were second last season...plus EL final.
Their squad was just abysmal.
Man fans on here thinks we are spurs or Arsenal or something. If we don't get top four next season, that should immediately sack our manager. There is no excuse that we don't get top four, especially with the squad we have. Even Ole had us dreaming of a title challenge earlier this season. No way, standards has dropped so low in such a short amount of time
I'd still expect a top 4 finish. We have the quality and resources. However I wouldn't say it's the be all and end all. If the football is developing well the manager can stay even if he finishes outside the top 4. I would that this combination is a rarity given how poor the 4th placed team tends to be.
I wouldn't praise the Liverpool board for their change in fortunes from what I've read from the Liverpool media.I was just going to say that. They nearly won the league before Klopp. And he was an appointment that built on the previous regime rather than being a shift. We haven't challenged let alone come close to winning in 9 years. People love putting it all on individuals and of course hiring a quality manager can change a lot. But we have have be fair to Liverpools owners too - they have been getting a lot right. With Rodgers they played fantastic football before things went wrong and under Klopp their transfer committee has worked wonders (while Klopp has coached excellently too of course). I think as much as they are happy / lucky to have him, Klopp has also picked well as Liverpool are very well run.
I wouldn't praise the Liverpool board for their change in fortunes from what I've read from the Liverpool media.
Liverpool when hiring Rodgers made a move for a young unproven coach at the highest level at the time who understood the requirements for the modern game. And Rodgers was ahead of the competition when it comes to implementing a coordinated pressing game. And that gave Liverpool a advantage against the competition and they almost beat out City under their head coach Pellegrini. But FSG hired Kenny Dalglish before they arrived at the Rodgers juncture. And even though Rodgers almost won the league it highlighted a flaw in the system at Liverpool which we at United are also suffering from imo.
And the flaw at Liverpool was that they had a large recruitment team already at the club but Rodgers didn't want to work under them or was reluctant to work with them according to reports. He made it clear to the Liverpool board that he didn't want to work under a Sporting director type setup and would like his own recruitment staff. The Liverpool board agreed to his demands and he almost won the league, but the key players in that Liverpool team were already at the club before Rodgers' arrival. You can credit him for Coutinho and Strurridge, but the amount of waste he bought can be viewed via the below link. The Liverpool fans and media blamed their scouts and Michael Edwards for the amount of poor signing at the time. Michael Edwards was a running joke among Liverpool fans at the time of Rodgers' sacking.
https://www.lfchistory.net/Transfers/ByManager/25/1
In steps Jurgen Klopp and the Liverpool board again give Klopp total control of the football side of the club according to the Liverpool press/media. But Klopp appoints Michael Edwards as the de facto Sporting director because he understands that it's in his best interests to be the the first team trainer/head coach and allow the recruitment team led by Edwards to create conditions for him to succeed. So Klopp gave the recruitment team the guiding principle/template to follow, when scouting players. And that created a streamlined approach to recruitment, where everyone at the club was working towards the same goal which was to recruit players for a particular way of playing the game. The much maligned Liverpool recruitment department that had become a laughing stock prior to Klopp's arrival were now the envy of it's rivals. And did Klopp select the Sporting director from outside of the club? The answer to that is obviously no.
Michael Edwards came to Liverpool to work as a analyst under Sporting director, Damien Comolli in 2011. He was part of a failed team because Comolli was sacked but Edwards was kept on. You can imagine the melt down if we hired a Sporting director after he was part of a failed DoF team and then was criticised for being part of the transfer committee that apparently failed Rodgers. But the difference is that with Rodgers he didn't want to work with Liverpool's recruitment department but Klopp came in and embraced the recruitment team at the club and they started singing from the same hymn sheet, and everything else is history.
Did Ole and Mourinho do what Klopp did or what Rodgers did? It's clear they did what Rodgers did and the United board allowed them to have their personal recruitment staff, which was the same at Liverpool who allowed Rodgers to have his own personal recruitment team. If you have a team of 50 plus people dedicated to recruitment and you then appoint a manager who doesn't want to work with said recruitment department, then you deserve failure. But there's a easy way to navigate around that, and that is for the board to allow the recruitment department to select the head coach and interview the potential candidate. And it looks like we're doing that now.
Only City and Liverpool are actually very good, Chelsea have had many hiccups and are easily 3rd, the rest if you look at their season entirely have been very average and inconsistent, with the shit season we have had top four should be totally out of sight but it isn't, we should be at least favourite for fourth next season, considering our current group and the fact we'll most likely out spend all our competitors (Tottenham, Arsenal, West Ham, Leicester city).I don't know if we are as stacked in talent as we think we are. Top 4 next season would be the best yardstick to judge success for the new manager. I agree... I feel we should give ten Hag at least 2 seasons rather than give him the sack at the end of next season if we finish in 5th or 6th for example.
So just this forum?It's not about winning, just pointing something out that's prevalent on this forum
Good post, there’s history if we choose to learn from it.I wouldn't praise the Liverpool board for their change in fortunes from what I've read from the Liverpool media.
Liverpool when hiring Rodgers made a move for a young unproven coach at the highest level at the time who understood the requirements for the modern game. And Rodgers was ahead of the competition when it comes to implementing a coordinated pressing game. And that gave Liverpool a advantage against the competition and they almost beat out City under their head coach Pellegrini. But FSG hired Kenny Dalglish before they arrived at the Rodgers juncture. And even though Rodgers almost won the league it highlighted a flaw in the system at Liverpool which we at United are also suffering from imo.
And the flaw at Liverpool was that they had a large recruitment team already at the club but Rodgers didn't want to work under them or was reluctant to work with them according to reports. He made it clear to the Liverpool board that he didn't want to work under a Sporting director type setup and would like his own recruitment staff. The Liverpool board agreed to his demands and he almost won the league, but the key players in that Liverpool team were already at the club before Rodgers' arrival. You can credit him for Coutinho and Strurridge, but the amount of waste he bought can be viewed via the below link. The Liverpool fans and media blamed their scouts and Michael Edwards for the amount of poor signings at the time. Michael Edwards was a running joke among Liverpool fans at the time of Rodgers' sacking.
https://www.lfchistory.net/Transfers/ByManager/25/1
In steps Jurgen Klopp and the Liverpool board again give Klopp total control of the football side of the club according to the Liverpool press/media. But Klopp appoints Michael Edwards as the de facto Sporting director because he understands that it's in his best interests to be the the first team trainer/head coach and allow the recruitment team led by Edwards to create conditions for him to succeed. So Klopp gave the recruitment team the guiding principle/template to follow, when scouting players. And that created a streamlined approach to recruitment, where everyone at the club was working towards the same goal which was to recruit players for a particular way of playing the game. The much maligned Liverpool recruitment department that had become a laughing stock prior to Klopp's arrival were now the envy of it's rivals. And did Klopp select the Sporting director from outside of the club? The answer to that is obviously no.
Michael Edwards came to Liverpool to work as a analyst under Sporting director, Damien Comolli in 2011. He was part of a failed team because Comolli was sacked but Edwards was kept on. You can imagine the melt down if we hired a Sporting director after he was part of a failed DoF team and then was criticised for being part of the transfer committee that apparently failed Rodgers. But the difference is that with Rodgers he didn't want to work with Liverpool's recruitment department but Klopp came in and embraced the recruitment team at the club and they started singing from the same hymn sheet, and everything else is history.
Did Ole and Mourinho do what Klopp did or what Rodgers did? It's clear they did what Rodgers did and the United board allowed them to have their personal recruitment staff, which was the same at Liverpool who allowed Rodgers to have his own personal recruitment team. If you have a team of 50 plus people dedicated to recruitment and you then appoint a manager who doesn't want to work with said recruitment department, then you deserve failure. But there's a easy way to navigate around that, and that is for the board to allow the recruitment department to select the head coach and interview the potential candidate. And it looks like we're doing that now.
So did Watford, not sure I'd want Ranieri (was that him at the time?) as coach, thoughI'm certain ETH's current Ajax team would beat us this season in a heartbeat.
I'm certain ETH's current Ajax team would beat us this season in a heartbeat.
Ajax | Manchester United | |
---|---|---|
69.4 | Possession % | 30.6 |
12 | Shots on target | 1 |
24 | Shots | 5 |
928 | Touches | 488 |
754 | Passes | 331 |
13 | Tackles | 16 |
8 | Clearances | 20 |
9 | Corners | 3 |
0 | Offsides | 1 |
0 | Yellow cards | 1 |
10 | Fouls conceded | 16 |