It's unfortunate that Roy Keane can't work under Fergie, otherwise he wd have been my preferred choice to take over, especially to deal with the egos, player power and attitudes that have reared their ugly heads at the club of late.
It's unfortunate that Roy Keane can't work under Fergie, otherwise he wd have been my preferred choice to take over, especially to deal with the egos, player power and attitudes that have reared their ugly heads at the club of late.
It's unfortunate that Roy Keane can't work under Fergie, otherwise he wd have been my preferred choice to take over, especially to deal with the egos, player power and attitudes that have reared their ugly heads at the club of late.
Batista would batista bomb Keano and maintain the WWE championship.Keano could've been useful in overthrowing Batista.
In restoring United? Not so much.
Ornstein reporting we want it sorted by the end of March.
Batista would batista bomb Keano and maintain the WWE championship.
It's unfortunate that Roy Keane can't work under Fergie, otherwise he wd have been my preferred choice to take over, especially to deal with the egos, player power and attitudes that have reared their ugly heads at the club of late.
Agreed. Especially the part Poch is good but not good enough to compete with Pep and Klopp. I remember read somewhere a good manager 30% is tactic, 70% is social and man management skill(both the board and the players).He’s definitely the best (and most exciting) appointment simply because we don’t know how good he really is. Someone like Poch is a known entity - we know he’s a pretty good manager but isn’t going to have us competing with City and Liverpool. None of the established managers are as good as Pep and Klopp - our best bet is taking a gamble on someone relatively unproven but has shown signs he could be the real deal.
Agreed. Especially the part Poch is good but not good enough to compete with Pep and Klopp. I remember read somewhere a good manager 30% is tactic, 70% is social and man management skill(both the board and the players).
Hiring a manager based on how much they wave their arms around is fecking mentalWhat’s his touchline presence like?
All top managers now are animated on the touchline and put pressure on officials.
Ia he quite calm / sits a lot? Or can he be quite animated?
What does Mitchell van der Graag actually do?
You should add in there management of the coaching staff and training. Despite what so many fans think a massive part of it is what happens on the training pitch. Training session quality has to be top quality, if it isnt even the best man managers and tactics wont work.Agreed. Especially the part Poch is good but not good enough to compete with Pep and Klopp. I remember read somewhere a good manager 30% is tactic, 70% is social and man management skill(both the board and the players).
Edit.
Found it
Julian Nagelsmann - "30% of coaching is tactics, 70% is social competence"
Hiring a manager based on how much they wave their arms around is fecking mental
According to Roy Keane it is about passion and who wants it more. That's why he is a pundit now suggested Simeone as next United manager.
I’d quite like a hyperactive manager too. Constantly at the players demanding more rather than calmly sitting and waiting till half time to speak.
Obviously that manager has to be more than competent too.
Didn't even remotely say that. Just asked about it.Hiring a manager based on how much they wave their arms around is fecking mental
Would it be better if his name was Eric Gazza Smith?To me, Ten Hag benefits from exotic name syndrome. I haven’t seen a superstar there but could be wrong. Whoever Utd choose they need to give them at least 3 years.
To me, Ten Hag benefits from exotic name syndrome. I haven’t seen a superstar there but could be wrong. Whoever Utd choose they need to give them at least 3 years.
Hopefully we’re getting him tied down now before Madrid/PSG are in the market for a coach. We’ve had 6 months to prepare, even we should be able to do a deal in that time.
It's because people think we are above all these clubs and their hipster manager choices. There's a real elitism in this fanbase that people need to look in the mirror at, but refuse to. It's the same with players, a top club sells a player and see how many times you read "why would we want this clubs reject"It's so strange people think it's a risk us employing him, but never say the same of PSG or Madrid when they make similar appointments.
Nah I think it's just more to do with everyone being a big risk at United because of everything above the manager. But it shouldn't be held against any 1 manager, as it applies for everyone. Other clubs you assume they'll also implement the structure around the manager that he needs. Here ... Who knows?It's because people think we are above all these clubs and their hipster manager choices. There's a real elitism in this fanbase that people need to look in the mirror at, but refuse to. It's the same with players, a top club sells a player and see how many times you read "why would we want this clubs reject"
To me, Ten Hag benefits from exotic name syndrome. I haven’t seen a superstar there but could be wrong. Whoever Utd choose they need to give them at least 3 years.
I think possibly they think those clubs would realise their mistake a lot sooner than we would. Poch is on his way out of PSG after what, a year? Madrid gave Rafa the bullet after 6 months, Lopetegui only half that. United on the other hand seem to stick to their guns, I mean Ole got 3 years on the back of one interim stint.It's so strange people think it's a risk us employing him, but never say the same of PSG or Madrid when they make similar appointments.
If he had a British name like Mauricio Pochettino would anyone be interested?To me, Ten Hag benefits from exotic name syndrome. I haven’t seen a superstar there but could be wrong. Whoever Utd choose they need to give them at least 3 years.
Surely an exotic name is something fancy like Bravo Sanchez or something. ETH is hardly an exotic name, you just mean he comes from another country.
There is absolutely nothing exotic about the name Erik ten Hag.
You just mean foreign.
Exotic as in "no typical english surname" like Johnson, James, Jones, etc
Ten Hag isn't an anglo surname.
Yes, it's exotic, unless dutch surnames are common in England, which i don't think it's the case.
Both 'Ten' and 'Hag' are even words in English. (If only his name were 'Ten Hags'!)Definition of exotic is: 'originating in or characteristic of a distant foreign country.'
Netherlands isn't that. Exotic for me has always meant to be about places far away and mysterious.
Yes but Pochettino beat ETH that one time and so he's a vastly better manager don't you understand. Just as Ole beat Guardiola so he's a vastly better manager, that's how these things workHasn't Ten Hag basically bettered the likes of Nagelsmann and Rose, both of those garnered a fair amount of support in becoming our new manager.
Yes but Pochettino beat ETH that one time and so he's a vastly better manager don't you understand. Just as Ole beat Guardiola so he's a vastly better manager, that's how these things work