Given @MvG hasn't been on the forum a year and was promoted in September, I'm assuming it was a joke.
(If not, I'll join the eyerolling.)
Erik ten Hag | Currently unemployed
- Thread starter Panther
- Start date
Daily star
Ten Hag about to get slapped
100%, it's not to be trusted in the slightest.
We have the biggest wet the bed fanbase about.
When things clearly look like they are moving in a new and right direction as the evidence is showing us, we had this mad phase of Qanon like Conspiracies and plots where the board where dreaming up these mad plots to bring in Poch and nothing has changed at all, people losing their mind to random tweets from clowns from the mail who clearly not in the know to bash everybody more.
Murtough and Fletcher getting dogs abuse based on a tweet, when reality was they seemed to be doing my their jobs this whole time, even as people been saying they not qualified shouldn't be in the jobs. Could be true to an extent, but as it stands they seem to be showing more sound knowledge than most folk at the club, and other experts in the media who been talking, with how they been handling this appointment.
Now it's PR spin, who needs football men, bring back Woody,
Delighted if true.
Pochslapped out of a job opportunity?
It likely is. They had an article about a Newcastle fan being mistaken for a zebra by another zebra not long ago which turned out to be true and had a very unsavoury ending.
Sends a signal to the others as well if he is able to feck ronaldo off. None of you cnuts are safe if he isn’t.
If he’s looking to make an authoritative statement of intent there’s probably no better way.
Feck knows if this news is true or not, but I would like to think it is. There's no future for Ronaldo here and we need to quickly move on.
He needs to move on to the Maguire issue after that.
He needs to move on to the Maguire issue after that.
Don't think it's true. Ronaldo is the key for our marketing side of things. You have a GOAT in your team with huge marketing potential. I'm pretty sure one of the terms we set to ETH was to be inclusive of Ronaldo in any plans.
I dont see any wrong in it. Ronaldo can still be productive in right circumstances, albeit in a reduced role .
The marketing doesn't really work if we're playing in the mighty conference league, something which will likely bother Ronaldo too and will cause him to push for a move from his end.
If any of this is true, its probably the club trying to save face with the inevitably of CR7 deciding he wants out.
You can have Brian Kidd when you have already won the European Cup Winners Cup and have your assistant who has won it too. Ole don't have that pedigree.
Could very well be that . He wants out and we are twisting the narrative.
First percentile, number one again!
That's the thing. Ole's managerial stint has been the most successful since SAF but you and other people here just plain refuse to acknowledge that
Let's hope so. It would absolutely be the wrong decision to keep Ronaldo. There's no benefit to forcing the 2 to work together when he doesn't suit ETH at all, while you can't marginalize Ronaldo without it being a huge story and a huge distraction.
Is Klopp trash manager for getting relegated witih Meinz?
Debatable, mourinho won 2 trophies, however bad it was at the end
Would be a good idea, but I'll wait for a more reputable source (eg. the Beano) to weigh in first.
I like trophies as much as the next guy but I measure managers by their league performance. There is no luck when you look at 38 games. Cups and one-off games can be decided by luck easily. Like us losing on penalties, for example.
Technically he won the treble if you include the Community Shield.
Seriously, where do these stories come from? Unless some board member just picks up the phone to some random journo and says, "Hey you never guess what. We've just been talking to Ten Hag and he doesn't fancy Ronaldo next season...", I can't see how these stories can be true. There must be a credible source for it to be true but I'd be gobsmacked if they gave up information that readily.
This is what concerns me. The United hierarchy don't want a manager having influence on transfers and recruitment but the recent rumors are that Hag made a list of demands that points to the contrary. Hag was indeed a head coach at Ajax, a much better run club than our farce, but if his demands are true it suggests he may be concerned about the club's ability to give him the support he needs.
The club may commit to this on paper but how will it play out in reality? There's a serious contradiction here. Hag seems to want more than just a head coach role now, much like Pochettino wanted at Spurs
I’m going to peel my eyeballs out with a fork the next time I have to see him being called Hag in this thread.
how do you peel stuff with a fork ?
Why do you care so much? Are you Dutch? Is it insulting?
I see you're unfamiliar with the delicate act of eye peeling.
Shut it you hag.
There's not a chance in hell he would have taken the job if we made that a condition.
You can't be undertaking a rebuild (both at a managerial/coaching level and at board level) and also demand a 37 year old is part of any plan going forward. They're incompatible.
ETH has been known to do his due diligence with all of his jobs, he'll have certainly done it with us, and like I said, there's no way he would have taken the job if we forced Ronaldo on him.