- Joined
- May 27, 2024
- Messages
- 282
'A loss can be a win'This man really said that the year where he oversaw both our worst Premier League and European campaign in history was a success.
I can't quite take that in.
'A loss can be a win'This man really said that the year where he oversaw both our worst Premier League and European campaign in history was a success.
I can't quite take that in.
They should actually say ‘the plan’ is not working and that maybe it’s time to devise another one, or three.Why don’t these journalists ever ask him what the feck “the plan” actually is?
He seems extremely confident that there's been absolutely no thought of replacing him. In fact, it sounds like there's been a lot of confidence shown in him to the point where he comfortable to chastise and take the piss out of journalists for suggesting he could be sacked.
To me these are really bad signs that our club is not being run in the right way. The likelihood is that they're somehow happy with this clown in charge and it'll take a lot (more) for him to get the boot.
It astounds me how people still take answers at press conferences at face value
Personally never cared about press conferences, before or after matches. Because there's nothing a manager or a player can say that matters when they actually play. Who cares what has been said if the team loses, draws or wins? It doesn't change the result of the match.It astounds me how people still take answers at press conferences at face value
Pretty much where I’m at with triple emphasis on Mainoo.
Don’t think I have ever been this apathetic toward a season or manager; just feels like a complete waste of time, and a ruinous one at that.
Why not? Managers don't say it how it is for very obvious reasons.I see this said a lot but, why not? It's the only chance he has to communicate with fans. Somebody with a bit more intelligence would use the opportunity to get people on side. He's there answering the questions anyway, so why not use his time more productively?
He's the only coach I know that is continuously abrasive in his answers. You'd think he'd want the fans in his corner but he just winds up more and more people.
Score predictions for tomorrow say most people think we'll get the job done. Definite divide there between the views of the majority and the tunnel-visioned pessimism that threads like this cultivate.
No, I'm referring to all the posts saying we will not win tomorrow. I think you're trying to argue something else. That doesn't make you sound a bit clever and that's not ok.You will probably find that many "tunnel visioned pessimists" as you call them will expect a few wins here and there from a team built with hundreds of millions against dross like Brentford at home. Hardly a proper way to judge the mood.
But I'm sure you know that but wanted to sound a bit clever. That's ok.
He's not good at it though. Of course he can't just burn everything through his answers, but there's more than one way to combine realism with optimism.Why not? Managers don't say it how it is for very obvious reasons.
Managers that tend to be frank and give an honest assessment don't last very much in the job. Managing yourself carefully among the media in both good and bad times is essential to the role. No one should be bothered about what is said unless they are talking about injuries (for the case of the fixture), or slagging off players or slagging off owners (this gives a red flag that the harmony isn't there).
Finding him abrasive is subjective. There are pockets of fans who will hate him from 90% of the possible answers he could give.
Why not? Managers don't say it how it is for very obvious reasons.
Managers that tend to be frank and give an honest assessment don't last very much in the job. Managing yourself carefully among the media in both good and bad times is essential to the role. No one should be bothered about what is said unless they are talking about injuries (for the case of the fixture), or slagging off players or slagging off owners (this gives a red flag that the harmony isn't there).
Finding him abrasive is subjective. There are pockets of fans who will hate him from 90% of the possible answers he could give.
The results are shit. So whatever he says will piss people off at the moment.He's doing a bloody good job at pissig off every United fan out there with his statements that's for sure. Quite a feat when "managing himself carefully"
The results are shit. So whatever he says will piss people off at the moment.
If the results were there those same people would post " love it" at everything he said.
Over 50% also thought we'd beat Spurs. Many still haven't caught up with just how bad we are.Score predictions for tomorrow say most people think we'll get the job done. Definite divide there between the views of the majority and the tunnel-visioned pessimism that threads like this cultivate.
Your positivity is most welcome. Well, positive in the sense that we'll finally gain a win since Barnsley.
You get the point. Neither was Churchill, Genghis Khan, Hitler, the Pope, etc…Gandhi was not a good man… let alone admirable. Please don’t pivot to Mother Teresa…
Are you for realThere has been so much banging on about how if Ten Hag were sacked, Southgate will be hired to replace him. Let me be clear, I wouldn’t want Southgate either, but:
Southgate with England: P 102 W61 D24 L17 59.8%
Ten Hag: P 125 W69 D22 L34 55.2%
Ok..You get the point. Neither was Churchill, Genghis Khan, Hitler, the Pope, etc…
Most important discussion in this threadYou get the point. Neither was Churchill, Genghis Khan, Hitler, the Pope, etc…
Perhaps things just get lost in translation?They're doing a shit job because they won't ask him Wtf he's drinking thinking everything is fine. He deserves every bit of aggro he gets from everyone including the press if they deservedly tore him a new one.
Have some faith, Arthur!
Perhaps but then I do recall this thread also being quite sure we'd lose to Porto and Villa.Over 50% also thought we'd beat Spurs. Many still haven't caught up with just how bad we are.
Ten hag is annoying now me now as much as LVG with the utter bollox that comes out of his mouth.
Personally never cared about press conferences, before or after matches. Because there's nothing a manager or a player can say that matters when they actually play. Who cares what has been said if the team loses, draws or wins? It doesn't change the result of the match.
Only care about press conferences before matches, because of FPL(injury news) and that's about it.
Why not? Managers don't say it how it is for very obvious reasons.
Managers that tend to be frank and give an honest assessment don't last very much in the job. Managing yourself carefully among the media in both good and bad times is essential to the role. No one should be bothered about what is said unless they are talking about injuries (for the case of the fixture), or slagging off players or slagging off owners (this gives a red flag that the harmony isn't there).
Finding him abrasive is subjective. There are pockets of fans who will hate him from 90% of the possible answers he could give.
You're right there, he's not charismatic.He's not good at it though. Of course he can't just burn everything through his answers, but there's more than one way to combine realism with optimism.
But Ten Hag just isn't a charismatic public speaker with strong oneliners (apart from that one about dynasties coming and going I suppose), so by now everyone should know what to expect.
Not comparable. How many games did England play when they were not the favorite. They’re some really bad international teams in there.There has been so much banging on about how if Ten Hag were sacked, Southgate will be hired to replace him. Let me be clear, I wouldn’t want Southgate either, but:
Southgate with England: P 102 W61 D24 L17 59.8%
Ten Hag: P 125 W69 D22 L34 55.2%
I'm already crying to be fairHope for the best and prepare to laugh at the worst. Because if you didn't you'd cry.
Is it though? I think it’s the natural reaction, but look down the fixture list and most of the matches are against decent teams. Sure, you’ve got Malta, North Macedonia and Scotland, but there is also Brazil, Belgium, Italy, Spain, France… the only real minnows were in qualifying for the World Cup. Nations League has changed it so you’re playing the top teams consistently.Not comparable. How many games did England play when they were not the favorite. They’re some really bad international teams in there.
Most important post in the threadMost important discussion in this thread
It’s truly outstanding. Outstandingly bad.This man really said that the year where he oversaw both our worst Premier League and European campaign in history was a success.
I can't quite take that in.
Are you a baldie?Similarities between LVG and ETH:
Both Dutch.
Both shite for United.
DIfferences between LVG and ETH:
LVG had a genuinely impressive resume at the top level. His arrogance was at least based on past glories. ETH has nothing of the sort. His arrogance is based on feck all.
LVG was a character, he had charisma in spades (whether his brand of charisma was your cup of tea or not). ETH is about as appealing as a flaccid cock wrapped in a wet blanket.
LVG had hair.
(And so forth).
Apologies if I worded anything arseways, was in my shop and replying then got it busy so I was rushing! ha.I don't know if I understand your question but I would see it as luck more than coincidence, in the sense that United stumbled on two of the greatest managers ever but the reality is that it's not the fruit of a sound process otherwise they would have quickly replaced either of them which didn't happen. The Edwards Family needed 18 years to actually replace SAF.
Now there is one organization in Sport that somehow follows a process that saw them get successful long term head coaches one after the other without fail since 1969 and that's the Pittsburg Steelers, 3 managers and they all won the SuperBowl.
Are you a baldie?
You don’t spend your summer interviewing multiple managers if you think you’ve already got the right man, it’s just illogicalApologies if I worded anything arseways, was in my shop and replying then got it busy so I was rushing! ha.
Regarding my question. Firstly, for longevity and success, it needs to be the right manager. I'm not saying than Ten Hag is the right manager - I'm not saying that he's not. I'm merely saying by sticking with a manager at United might have a long term benefit. It's such a stressful and hard job and not many managers in the world are able to actually do it. At United, only TWO managers have had massive success. But they had a long period of success. It was different eras - but the owners gamble on the two paid off. They stuck through a tragedy, Matt Busby rebuilt a team. Busby left, it took years for the right man to come - which is Sir Alex - and he was maybe a goal away from getting sacked. They gambled by keeping him and it paid off.
The one thing none of us know is what it's like behind the scenes. For all we know, the owners are confident Ten Hag is the right man because everything could be perfect......until it comes to match day. If the biggest problem is the players mentality - you can't put all that blame on the manager. Those players there now need to settle their nerves and drive on and who knows, with work they do behind the scenes - maybe that's what can happen. It's like if you work for a builder - you have your training done, you have the right tools and knowledge and then it comes to doing a big job and you're on a serious time frame to finish it and you mess it up....would you blame yourself or your boss? My point being, if a new manager comes in and here's the thing, the training might not be as good as Ten Hag, then match day comes along and their mentality is still bad.....then what? The thing is, none of us can say for sure that the training and behind the scenes work is bad. Benni McCharthy said this in an interview this week. Everything was perfect until matchday.
I understand that but they came to the conclusion that there wasn't anyone out there that was better and/or wanted the job.You don’t spend your summer interviewing multiple managers if you think you’ve already got the right man, it’s just illogical
Let me ask you something, do you keep a manager who’s regressing the team because you’re afraid that you might hire another crappy one? Again illogical
Exactly. Which is why I hope we lose most of ours matches coming up so we can be rid of him once and for all. Short term pain = long term gain.'A loss can be a win'