Vault Dweller
Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
This game to game approach is absolutely crap. So if he wins 2 of the next 3/4 that's good enough? Fed up.
I am not really sure that this is true, probably we will win again under ETH if he remains employed, however I could not tell you right now which team in the prem I think we are actually better than at the moment or would probably beat.We’ll surely we’ll have to win again some time this season? From reading this forum, you’d think we’re on our way towards relegation.
We’ll surely we’ll have to win again some time this season? From reading this forum, you’d think we’re on our way towards relegation.
A bit simplified but I agree. What we ought to do when saying “give him time” is define it - what do we mean by that phrase?This give the manager time is really getting on my nerves. We're not in 1987 anymore. The role Sir Alex and Sir Matt had is gone. Their job is broken in a million roles from DOF to Sporting director right to technical director, academy manager, chief scouts and data analysts. Sir Alex latter reign saw him transitioning from manager to Sporting director in all but name as most of the day to day things were handled by Phelan and Rene.
These days managers are glorified PE teachers. Their job is to conduct training, make sure that the squad is properly motivated and win games on the pitch. Sure he might have a say on transfers but that can be overruled. Even the likes of Klopp has to bow to that system and for good reason. Managers tend to want their own men as they strengthen their hand in and out of the dressing room. Just listen to the UNITED SEG telling his audience that on one hand ETH must be backed in January and on the other hand sacking ETH would cost us 200m as his squad (the Eredivisie one) will probably be made redundant after the manager is gone. Making themselves too expensive to get rid off is one of the ways managers gain control over things.
Managers these days are judged on progression. Are we moving forward yes or no? If the answer is no then he should be sacked
Since when?
The reports are that Yoro and Ugarte were club-led signings. Zirkzee also has no particular connection to ETH other than being Dutch, nor was it reported anywhere I can see that he was an ETH-led signing.
De Ligt has an obvious connection to ETH, but ETH outright said that the club suggested the signing. Which tracks given all the reports that the club had interest in him when he made his prior moves to Juve and Bayern. We also know we were initially interested in Branthwaite, again with zero indication that was a particularly ETH-led pursuit either.
That leaves Mazraoui, the cheapest of the signings, replacing a player who who was out of contract next summer, and offering an obvious upgrade on him.
It's hardly some massive commitment to ETH personally, unless you start making unfounded assumptions about who "directed" these transfers.
We know ETH has a veto, so targets will all be okayed by him, but that doesn't mean he drove them. And in the case of several of them, it's been directly reported he didn't.
Ten Hag has said in his press conference today that we need to "stick to the plan"
The players have done well, we won last season – maybe you forgot?
I bet "process" came up in his first sentenceTen Hag has said in his press conference today that we need to "stick to the plan"
I'll be even more bemused confused and bewildered by INEOS if we lose saturday and he gets sacked. In some ways that will be even more mental. I wouldn't be disappointed, granted, but it would be bizarre.
Well, the club certainly doesn't resemble the forum. Nothing is gained from going in circles on this all day long in the club's offices and training grounds. You'd certainly have to hope the club's management don't co stantly talk about this outside a few specific meetings.The most nauseating thing about these quotes is that I can actually believe that it really is quiet inside the club and he really is safe. Followed closely by how arrogant this fraud is
So true, it's so fecking depressing.What's disappointing is that he doesn't seem to have learned anything about the strengths or weaknesses of his players, or evolved tactically. Virtually every substitution is planned before the match and, like team selection, seems to have absolutely nothing to do with how well or poorly someone is playing or what we need tactically.
Rashford appalling for two years, plays virtually every minute of every game. He looks decent for once and he's pulled off in a preplanned substitution due to "rotation". The guy might as well go get a coffe and a bacon sandwich when the match is on because nothing he ever does is influenced by what happens on the pitch.
We just keep plugging away with the same approach hoping we get lucky and stumble across a team either so bad or having an off day, that his approach works. The stopped clock being right twice a day tactics.
It would be amazing if just once following a bad team or individual performance, he showed any evidence he's paid any attention whatsoever
They haven't had long in place but unfortunately football moves quickly and the decisions taken by ineos and their new people have made an already bad situation worse.
It was obvious ten hag should have been moved on in the summer but we didn't just keep him we backed him with significant spending.
Most of the signings made appear suspiciously like they were directed by him, this is an odd thing to do given ten hag was likely to be gone by Christmas. It's very easy to imagine some of those signings will be cast aside by the next manager.
Given our psr position, it would have seemed more prudent to hold back on some signings if our new dof wasn't fully on board to direct transfer activity or if we weren't sure about the type if football we want to play going forward
Have genuinely no idea how this will play out.
The most nauseating thing about these quotes is that I can actually believe that it really is quiet inside the club and he really is safe. Followed closely by how arrogant this fraud is
But the plan is shite Eric! unless the plan is to skirt relegationTen Hag has said in his press conference today that we need to "stick to the plan"
I want and demand to know, what is this plan you are sticking to?
This game to game approach is absolutely crap. So if he wins 2 of the next 3/4 that's good enough? Fed up.
Patience is indeed needed but in difference roles specifically to the sporting director one. That's why SJR said 'they only started working in July'. Football had changed alot since the 80s and the manager role had been seriously dumbed down. The days when CEOs didn't even know how much salary rival managers were paid are over. These days many CEOs had made their bones in the football world. Then there's the sporting director who take care of the most 'brain' intensive roles (vision, transfer strategy, making all departments work together in an efficient manner). Meanwhile the academy is also made independent from the first team and given its own aims, its own budget and its own people to lead it.A bit simplified but I agree. What we ought to do when saying “give him time” is define it - what do we mean by that phrase?
I think that most clubs lack patience nowadays, but I also think we’ve shown ETH more than enough. When I use the phrase “give him time” it means that a few bad games shouldn’t determine whether or not we sack a manager. But we should quite quickly be able to see where the manager wants the team to be in a season.
Take Thomas Frank who lost his first 8 games in charge of Brentford. It was of course very worrying, but the direction was clear and they were unlucky with a couple of the results based on XG. After those 8 games he hasn’t looked back. A clear style of play in the championship, another, but also clear, style in the prem, all his players always know excactly what to do. But that’s only the case because the club gave him time.
Arteta, Klopp (and now Ange maybe) were give time as well because it was evident where they wanted to take their teams - and because the improved them gradually, even though the process could be frustrating.
Contrast that to us and ETH who has had seasons to implement a clear style of play and buy the players he wants, but still no one can see where he wants the team to go. The last straw for me is that he has not been able to make the team tick even with all his favorites on the pitch.
That's the cool part, there isn't oneI want and demand to know, what is this plan you are sticking to?
This guy irritates me so much. He talks in bs bingo. He’s also absolutely deluded if he thinks that the stats are showing in a good direction. I hope that INEOS are looking at these things themselves and not listening to his horseshit.Erik ten Hag has hit back over the speculation surrounding his job as Manchester United boss, implying his critics are creating "lies and fairytales".
United have won just two of their first seven league games, and sit 14th in the Premier League table, closer to the relegation zone than fourth.
There were suggestions that Ten Hag's future was one of many topics up for discussion during a meeting involving Sir Jim Ratcliffe, Joel Glazer and United's leadership group, but Ten Hag remains in the job for Saturday's Premier League clash with Brentford and insists everyone at the club is on "one page".
"No," Ten Hag replied when asked if he had received assurances over his future at his press conference on Friday.
"The noises came from the media, some of you, not all of you. Some of you are coming up with stories, creating stories, creating fairytales, bringing a noise, bringing lies.
"I know we are all on one page at this club. I've said this before the break to some journalists who probably didn't believe me as I saw the reports. Internally at the club it's quiet.
"Of course we are discussing the position we are in and we're unhappy with that. We have to turn the corner and that's the strategy to turn this corner. We are quiet and composed, stick to the plan and are convinced we will turn the corner.
"We face challenges in football, sometimes it goes up or down. I'm sure we will make this a success as we did the last two seasons.
"Underneath I see good things, good patterns and good stats - that confirms we are in a good direction but the ranking is not lying. We are where we are and that's not good enough." [\QUOTE]
This game to game approach is absolutely crap. So if he wins 2 of the next 3/4 that's good enough? Fed up.
It might not look great, but once INEOS came onboard I always looked at it with two things in mind: Mistakes will be made, and INEOS should be judged long term.
We weren't going to get this season to where we really want to be - challenging for major honours, etc - so even if it takes more time than people want or expect, the thing that really matters is if we'll get there three or four years down the line.
Obviously there are question marks over the way they handled the managerial situation, but I'm willing to give them some leeway. Maybe they looked at the available options in the summer and decided that even if some of them might do better than ETH, it's far from a sure thing and it wouldn't be worth it rocking the boat like that at that time, when Berrada and Ashworth weren't still on board. That it would be better to let them come in, and then we'll be in a better position to bring in a new manager if it doesn't work with ETH. I think it makes sense.
There are questions and questions marks, but if, say, the time they bought in the last few months helps us get the right manager in - and Berrada and Ashworth are key players in this - then it could work for our benefit long term.
He would still survive.I'll be even more bemused confused and bewildered by INEOS if we lose saturday and he gets sacked. In some ways that will be even more mental. I wouldn't be disappointed, granted, but it would be bizarre.
Have some faith, Arthur!He puts the “Dutch” in Dutch van der Linde.