Toshey
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2021
- Messages
- 899
- Supports
- Levski Sofia
Is it possible that certain sponsors put pressure on the club to play Ronaldo?
You think that one change would've won us the game?
Im not sure. But I would be surprised if VDB gets another try out.
Okay well why are we getting injuries whilst they aren’t?arsenal are managing fine as they aren't going thru injuries especially in the attacking half....
we're dealing with missing martial, sancho and antony so we are having to start a 37yr old who's past it, rashford and a young kid with only his second start as well as a young kid in Elanga as our only option
arsenal put out sako, gabriel and martinelli...their starting forwards so i'd say it's massively different
No. He’s the only recognised striker who has been fit. Rashford has always been a LW rather than a 9 despite having played there a fair bit.Is it possible that certain sponsors put pressure on the club to play Ronaldo?
When we signed Eriksen to play CM, I thought he would play CM for home games but when we play away from home Ten Hag would play Fred to be more solid.
We've now been orangutaned in midfield away from home a few times. Yet Ten Hag persists to play Eriksen in the role. Even before the game I thought this was a CLEAR game for Fred to come in. I'm not a Fred fan and it's not often I feel a call to give him a start. But away from home against a mobile midfield who were going to be up for it in front of a new manager that was nothing short of naive and stupid from Ten Hag.
I winced at the team sheet of Eriksen and VdB in front of him. Eriksen should have been played as a number 10 in front of Fred and Casemiro today for the mobility and defensive cover needed. Eriksen would have covered nicely for Bruno.
Yes, the players selected didn't play well enough but Ten Hag didn't have to select VdB over Fred today. Neither did he have to play Luke Shaw every game for the past month.
Malacia, Fred, even AWB have been completely underutilised to give other players a break.
Ten Hags mistake today had cost us. He'll now look for a reaction midweek in the carabao Cup and probably play too strong of a team. Which weakens us for a must win game Vs Fulham before the World Cup break.
Today was a stinker from us but Ten Hag needs to take it on the chin rather than blame player attitude. He chose those 11 and set them up for this game naively.
When we signed Eriksen to play CM, I thought he would play CM for home games but when we play away from home Ten Hag would play Fred to be more solid.
We've now been orangutaned in midfield away from home a few times. Yet Ten Hag persists to play Eriksen in the role. Even before the game I thought this was a CLEAR game for Fred to come in. I'm not a Fred fan and it's not often I feel a call to give him a start. But away from home against a mobile midfield who were going to be up for it in front of a new manager that was nothing short of naive and stupid from Ten Hag.
I winced at the team sheet of Eriksen and VdB in front of him. Eriksen should have been played as a number 10 in front of Fred and Casemiro today for the mobility and defensive cover needed. Eriksen would have covered nicely for Bruno.
Yes, the players selected didn't play well enough but Ten Hag didn't have to select VdB over Fred today. Neither did he have to play Luke Shaw every game for the past month.
Malacia, Fred, even AWB have been completely underutilised to give other players a break.
Ten Hags mistake today had cost us. He'll now look for a reaction midweek in the carabao Cup and probably play too strong of a team. Which weakens us for a must win game Vs Fulham before the World Cup break.
Today was a stinker from us but Ten Hag needs to take it on the chin rather than blame player attitude. He chose those 11 and set them up for this game naively.
Very good post. I don't understand why some think that he is beyond criticism...I'm all for ETH, I think we've improved a lot under him and I am certain that once we strengthen, we will look like a proper team again. Today was on him though, we looked extremely open and tired in midfield (not for the first time) and paid the price. His lack of rotation is also a factor, if we can't beat the likes of Sheriff and that Cypriot team without our starting 11 then we have bigger problems than a loss away to Villa.
Onwards and upwards though, hopefully he learns from this and adjusts.
Hinted ? There's nothing in his post that says we should sack him, just that we shouldn't blindly follow him. Other posts in this thread have talked about asking questions if we failed to get top 4 which is a legit comment, only to be faced by people saying he should stay regardless of how this season pans out!
As others have said good post and in hindsight that would certainly have been a better shout.When we signed Eriksen to play CM, I thought he would play CM for home games but when we play away from home Ten Hag would play Fred to be more solid.
We've now been orangutaned in midfield away from home a few times. Yet Ten Hag persists to play Eriksen in the role. Even before the game I thought this was a CLEAR game for Fred to come in. I'm not a Fred fan and it's not often I feel a call to give him a start. But away from home against a mobile midfield who were going to be up for it in front of a new manager that was nothing short of naive and stupid from Ten Hag.
I winced at the team sheet of Eriksen and VdB in front of him. Eriksen should have been played as a number 10 in front of Fred and Casemiro today for the mobility and defensive cover needed. Eriksen would have covered nicely for Bruno.
Yes, the players selected didn't play well enough but Ten Hag didn't have to select VdB over Fred today. Neither did he have to play Luke Shaw every game for the past month.
Malacia, Fred, even AWB have been completely underutilised to give other players a break.
Ten Hags mistake today had cost us. He'll now look for a reaction midweek in the carabao Cup and probably play too strong of a team. Which weakens us for a must win game Vs Fulham before the World Cup break.
Today was a stinker from us but Ten Hag needs to take it on the chin rather than blame player attitude. He chose those 11 and set them up for this game naively.
Rashford is a much better striker than Ronaldo these days and the team is much better without Ronaldo inNo. He’s the only recognised striker who has been fit. Rashford has always been a LW rather than a 9 despite having played there a fair bit.
I concur with others, good post.When we signed Eriksen to play CM, I thought he would play CM for home games but when we play away from home Ten Hag would play Fred to be more solid.
We've now been orangutaned in midfield away from home a few times. Yet Ten Hag persists to play Eriksen in the role. Even before the game I thought this was a CLEAR game for Fred to come in. I'm not a Fred fan and it's not often I feel a call to give him a start. But away from home against a mobile midfield who were going to be up for it in front of a new manager that was nothing short of naive and stupid from Ten Hag.
I winced at the team sheet of Eriksen and VdB in front of him. Eriksen should have been played as a number 10 in front of Fred and Casemiro today for the mobility and defensive cover needed. Eriksen would have covered nicely for Bruno.
Yes, the players selected didn't play well enough but Ten Hag didn't have to select VdB over Fred today. Neither did he have to play Luke Shaw every game for the past month.
Malacia, Fred, even AWB have been completely underutilised to give other players a break.
Ten Hags mistake today had cost us. He'll now look for a reaction midweek in the carabao Cup and probably play too strong of a team. Which weakens us for a must win game Vs Fulham before the World Cup break.
Today was a stinker from us but Ten Hag needs to take it on the chin rather than blame player attitude. He chose those 11 and set them up for this game naively.
No one is blindly following anyone. He’s 4 months into this reign FFS and we are 5th with us playing well as a whole. Sacking a manager if they get top 4 or not is silly, managers should be measured on the progress they make with the team. Ideally we need to take the chance to make the top 4 this season as the teams around us are struggling as well.
I wouldn’t say much better, but I tend to agree in that his lack of mobility costs us. He looks so rigid these days. It’s sad to see.Rashford is a much better striker than Ronaldo these days and the team is much better without Ronaldo in
Thank you. I agree with both points. Regardless of tiredness/injuries that was an unacceptable showing from Utd today. The fact we have a performance like today, Brentford, city in us is not a good sign at all.People complaining about the squad can’t be familiar with the benches of the other Big Six teams. United aren’t hard off in comparison.
Also, the lamenting of injuries is getting a bit daft. We haven’t been a big outlier in terms of injured players.
As others have said good post and in hindsight that would certainly have been a better shout.
Just to play devils advocate and guess ETH’s thinking, perhaps he thought that by playing both DVB and Eriksen we would have more creativity than opting for Fred. We’ve hardly been creating loads of chances in the last few games.
Also, I know we shouldn’t be comparing ourselves to city at this juncture but pep has consistently played with only one defensive holding mid. Then again, the likes of Bernardo, gundogan are incredibly mobile and put in a defensive shift.
I tend to agree with most of that to be fair. KDB was simply sensational and dragged them on Saturday.He assumed that we will play all the game in their half and picked his side accordingly.
Naive from ETH and Emery capitalized on that. Their forwards were running at our defenders at will at times.
Watch Bernardo against Fulham and you'll understand why Pep can do that, him and KDB were monsters in covering space in order to offsetthe loss of Cancelo. We neither have the same mobility, workrate nor the technical level required to play like that.
On what basis is progress measured ? If the team is improving regarding play style, it should be translated into better results on the pitch. Progress = improvement in results. If he fails to achieve results, questions need to be asked, that's hardly a ridiculous claim here.
Yeah we know he's 4 months into his reign. No one wants him to get sacked tomorrow. He's not bullet proof that's all anyone of us is saying. However whenever he has a poor game, gets his tactics wrong or makes bad mistakes and people start pointing it out, some here jump on to defend him relentlessly and start spouting memorized nonsense about fans being entitled, impatient, wanting him gone after few months and all this bollocks, when in reality we're just criticizing him, no one wants him gone after 2-3 months, think he's a bad manager or anything like this.
The same thing happened under the previous managers as well. It's United's fans problem, ultimately. United fans think of managers in a different status than any other football club around us. It's expected since we're used to have Ferguson who was pretty much Manchester United personified, but the reality is managers get sacked all the time because of bad results or poor run of form all the time. They're just employees hired to do a job and will stay/get fired based on how they do this job.
Ok. So explain the sub of bringing on Martial to replace Dony in the hole, leaving Ronaldo who had done nothing all game on the pitch playing CF instead of bringing an actual midfielder in Fred to replace Dony and have Martial play as CF replacing Ronaldo.
I tend to agree with most of that to be fair. KDB was simply sensational and dragged them on Saturday.
I suppose a counter question is why can’t Eriksen/VdB put in a similar shift to a Bernardo or gundogan? In fairness VdB hasn’t played much football but on the point of technicality both he and Eriksen have that in abundance.
Now put forwards in your algorithm.People complaining about the squad can’t be familiar with the benches of the other Big Six teams. United aren’t hard off in comparison.
Also, the lamenting of injuries is getting a bit daft. We haven’t been a big outlier in terms of injured players.
I think your first point is particularly pertinent. We could have played rashford up top, garnacho and elanga out wide woth erikson in the Bruno role. That would have been a significant drop off in quality out wide but would have allowed us to press and retain some sort of structure to our team.We usually play rubbish when Ronaldo is up front. We usually play rubbish when Donny is our number 10. We usually play rubbish when Rashford plays on the right.
Today we had all 3 so it is was an uphill battle from the start. I get the team selection with the injuries and wanting to give Garnacho another go but the drop off when we lose players in certain positions is huge.
man injuries just happen and who knows why some don't and some do get injuredOkay well why are we getting injuries whilst they aren’t?
They hardly have a bigger or imo a much better squad and have had the same fixture contestion. I personally think ETH can be criticised for not rotating enough against omonia and sheriff.
Seriously, are many of their XI even starting for teams at the WC? Swear it’s only Saka partey and xhaka which is crazy to think.man injuries just happen and who knows why some don't and some do get injured
i'll say this though....put in the WC along with the fixtures piling up, arsenal will get theres. the workload will eventually catch up to you
Could be PEDs. Nandrolone and or inhalers. That KDB performance was something abnormal.Eriksen is the closest thing we have to them technically in midfield (still a tier below Bernardo and 2 below KDB) but VDB is nowhere near...the rest of the team isn't exactly blessed either.
As for workrate, I don't know. Maybe it's something ETH is working on, maybe it will take more time, maybe it's the lack of rotation...I don't know.
Antony and Sancho are ill, bit different. Martial has struggled with fitness for the past 2 years. Varane has struggled with his fitness for years now. The rest have been fit! It's just unfortunately a situation where 2 injury prone players are important and don't have cover. Or at least, don't have adequate cover. And then players getting sick in the fall, it happens.Okay well why are we getting injuries whilst they aren’t?
They hardly have a bigger or imo a much better squad and have had the same fixture contestion. I personally think ETH can be criticised for not rotating enough against omonia and sheriff.
the main one you are missing is JesusSeriously, are many of their XI even starting for teams at the WC? Swear it’s only Saka partey and xhaka which is crazy to think.
There were two very understandable options for ETH to do. Get an extra attacker on to give us more goal scoring options, or get an extra midfielder on to try to get more control. ETH chose the former, as many other managers would also have done. It doesn't have to be some big sign that Ronaldo has 'won'. It's worth noting that against Newcastle we were drawing so we weren't chasing the game as much, plus taking the #10 off for a striker is completely different when it's Bruno (who is more likely to score/assist than most of our attackers).So you're saying sacrificing an extra midfielder in a game we were struggling to control is the way to go if you want to get back in a game? Surely you know that's not true.
Ten Hag has before subbed out a striker (Ronaldo himself) to chase a goal (against Newcastle), so the chasing game part isn't an excuse.
People complaining about the squad can’t be familiar with the benches of the other Big Six teams. United aren’t hard off in comparison.
Also, the lamenting of injuries is getting a bit daft. We haven’t been a big outlier in terms of injured players.