I was making a point that those I mentioned, even though technically available to different extents, were actually more realistic than the names you were giving as they had just been employed elsewhere. Literally none of them have been reported as targets, so your post was just fecking stupid.
The rest of what you have said doesn't matter to us either, because the managers we are apparently interested in haven't gone to any of those teams. Some have even appointed managers than are arguably worse than what we could choose from right now. So again, a pointless discussion.
And for what it's worth, there would be absolutely nothing knee jerk about getting a new manager. All the main ETH supporters on here were all accepting of the fact that ETH should/will go not long ago, because deep down they knew it was going to happen due to results and performances. At any other club he doesn't survive this season. Pre-INEOS he probably would have gone too. There wouldn't have been this outrage if he'd have been sacked at any point before the final, yet after the final it's suddenly crazy to sack him. That is the only kneejerk opinion in all of this.
And given that INEOS have had months to prepare for the likely even that he needed to go, it wouldn't have been called kneejerk had they have lined up another option and sacked him. So what exactly is kneejerk about the idea he should have been sacked?