- Joined
- Dec 27, 2017
- Messages
- 33
The problem that people clamouring for change overlook, is that the footballing structure at the club is a mess. The scouting system is awful, the treatment of staff is awful, the ground is falling to bits, the training ground is fraying at the edges, the youth academy is OK but falling behind others, and we'd honestly be better with Harold Shipman as head of our medical team - at least that way we'd know players weren't fit!
The natural result of this is that the manager's responsibilities are so much greater at Man Utd compared to other more functional clubs. And if we get rid of the manager, everything will change, and we'll be back to square one from the playing front. We simply can't compare ourselves to the Real Madrids, Dortmunds and Bayerns, where the footballing structure is really strong and well established, and they can happily hire and fire head coaches without it having a meaningful effect on the infrastructure.
We can compare ourselves to Chelsea, who are similarly structureless and dysfunctional behind the scenes. They certainly change their managers regularly, but I'm not sure we'd want to copy them?
The ETH pros and cons are well rehearsed, I've nothing to add here, they're mostly valid views on both sides. He's proved he can win stuff (and that's REALLY important), but the league campaign's been a shocker, and that's important too. I just think the priority for the club, and INEOS, is to get the infrastructure right, get the facilities, the scouting, the footballing oversight and the medical team where they need to be. I'm glad this is happening. If ETH can't perform with this behind him next year, then he shouldn't have his contract renewed and he should leave. I don't think we should offer a contract extension. But I don't think things are so bad that we need to tear everything up and start again at the same time as we're trying to build a Premier League standard infrastructure.
The natural result of this is that the manager's responsibilities are so much greater at Man Utd compared to other more functional clubs. And if we get rid of the manager, everything will change, and we'll be back to square one from the playing front. We simply can't compare ourselves to the Real Madrids, Dortmunds and Bayerns, where the footballing structure is really strong and well established, and they can happily hire and fire head coaches without it having a meaningful effect on the infrastructure.
We can compare ourselves to Chelsea, who are similarly structureless and dysfunctional behind the scenes. They certainly change their managers regularly, but I'm not sure we'd want to copy them?
The ETH pros and cons are well rehearsed, I've nothing to add here, they're mostly valid views on both sides. He's proved he can win stuff (and that's REALLY important), but the league campaign's been a shocker, and that's important too. I just think the priority for the club, and INEOS, is to get the infrastructure right, get the facilities, the scouting, the footballing oversight and the medical team where they need to be. I'm glad this is happening. If ETH can't perform with this behind him next year, then he shouldn't have his contract renewed and he should leave. I don't think we should offer a contract extension. But I don't think things are so bad that we need to tear everything up and start again at the same time as we're trying to build a Premier League standard infrastructure.