You seem to be operating under this absurd logic that any of us that want Ten Hag sacked think success is guaranteed with a new manager (none of us think that). When in reality the actual stance is “we are more likely to turn the ship around and progress under a new manager than we are with the current one”.
Thats literally how decisions should be made, nothing is guaranteed that should seem obvious. As far as “what makes me think I know best?” I mean I have opinions just like everyone else. But my opinion is based on what’s now 2 years of evidence of seeing the current managers plans play out, underlying horrid metrics from this season, a lack of adjustments made after initial game plans don’t work, questionable in game management, VERY questionable talent ID in transfers (although this isn’t totally on him). So yeah I think he should go as I think we’ve seen enough over a long enough time period to know he isn’t good enough. Some want him to stay based on our injury luck this year. Thats fine, people can have their opinions no matter how much i might disagree.
The entire point is making a decision that’s in the best interest of us progressing forward as I’m pretty sure everyone here wants to see us get back to dominating like we did a decade ago and before. But saying that those us that want him sacked can’t say shit if the new manager is also sacked in two years hilarious, as if we don’t have ample evidence that multiple managers can be failures without being related to each other.