Robbie Boy
Full Member
Yeah, I don't think he'll be here next season. I wouldn't be 100% shocked if he was, but it's looking less and less likely.
Dalot - failed under Jose, Ole - agreed
Varane - failed under Ole - started well, mostly injured, hard to daw a conclusion
Maguire - failed under Ole - good for 1 season, bad for the second
Lindelof - failed under Jose and Ole - agreed
Casemiro - failed this season under ETH
Mainoo - hasn’t failed anyone
Forson - n/a
Bruno - Burnt out under Ole - better for 2.5 seasons under Ole than he is now
Garnacho - hasn’t failed anyone
Rashford - failed under LvG, Jose, and Ole - definitely didn't fail under LvG or Ole
Others include:
Martial - failed under LvG, Jose and Ole - definitely didn't fail for LvG or 1.5 seasons of Ole
Shaw - failed under Jose and Ole - got POTY under Ole
McT - failed under Jose and Ole
AWB - failed under Ole
So what magic wand could ETH wield to turn these guys into consistent title challengers?
Moyes, LVG, Mourinho and Ole have won a grand total of 2 x Europa Conference League trophies since leaving United. Combined.
Do United need to overhaul their entire footballing operation? Of course. But the last five Managers you’ve hired were either past their best, or not good enough to start with.
Every Manager failing so far is evidence that things need to change above the Manager. I don’t see a single person arguing against that. But it’s an obvious logical fallacy to assume that means there are no Managers anywhere on Earth that could do a better job. Managers come to Old Trafford every other week with weaker squads and create a myriad of chances. No matter how many injuries United have, their starting lineup and subs are far superior to Luton’s.
I never thought I’d miss the days of United fans having a (justified) sense of arrogance about their team. This thread is actually a little depressing.
It weird cos teams very rarely have a fully fit squad.Yep. I’ve grown tired of the debates at this point because the people that are staunchly defending ETH aren’t going change their minds, and those of us on the other side won’t do so either barring some miracle 180 change in direction, performances, tactics etc that’s never going to occur. And now that we have some injuries to starters again people are willing to just accept that we won’t be any good and it’s not his fault if performances going forward are crap because he doesn’t have our strongest XI fit b
It weird cos teams very rarely have a fully fit squad.
Liverpool have got terrible injuries and they're competing on four fronts. Arsenal's good run in form has coincided with the introduction of Kiwior - our 4th choice LB. Our strongest 11 is:
Martinelli / Jesus / Saka
Rice / Partey / Odegaard
Timber / Gabriel / Saliba / White
Raya
How many games have they played together? Zero. How about we swap in Zinchenko for Timber. Zero. Havertz for Jesus? Zero. Jorginho for Partey? Still Zero.
If you can only avoid being overrun when you have a clean bill of health - you a pretty limited Manager.
LVG shouldn’t be counted for this as he’s international manager. Moyes won the conference thing with West Ham and doing an alright job with them. Solskjær hasn’t got back into management since leaving us. Mourinho as you said did alright at Roma. So I’d say they’ve all been good at the very most since leaving us… it’s hard to judge them on winning things at other clubs when the expectations will be lower and they won’t have the money we have.Not one of the managers we've sacked so far has done anything of note after leaving us, apart from Mourinho maybe but that was only after he failed miserably at Spurs.
It weird cos teams very rarely have a fully fit squad.
Liverpool have got terrible injuries and they're competing on four fronts. Arsenal's good run in form has coincided with the introduction of Kiwior - our 4th choice LB. Our strongest 11 is:
Martinelli / Jesus / Saka
Rice / Partey / Odegaard
Timber / Gabriel / Saliba / White
Raya
How many games have they played together? Zero. How about we swap in Zinchenko for Timber. Zero. Havertz for Jesus? Zero. Jorginho for Partey? Still Zero.
If you can only avoid being overrun when you have a clean bill of health - you a pretty limited Manager.
Maybe he will, although Ashworth may not be in post for a year anyway. Ratcliffe doesn't seem to me like a man who will delay on making key decisions. My opinion is the team will need to show more on the pitch to get backing from him than it's showing now. If the executive appointments are exciting, there'll be top managers who would want the job.
The resources I refer to is the investment in the squad he's had. Whatever the issues with the footballing structure of the club, he can't say he hasn't been backed to bring in his own players.
Difference being you’re had 4 years+ of the same manager to cultivate a squad in his image so when you do lose Partey. You’ve got someone like Havertz and just move Rice.It weird cos teams very rarely have a fully fit squad.
Liverpool have got terrible injuries and they're competing on four fronts. Arsenal's good run in form has coincided with the introduction of Kiwior - our 4th choice LB. Our strongest 11 is:
Martinelli / Jesus / Saka
Rice / Partey / Odegaard
Timber / Gabriel / Saliba / White
Raya
How many games have they played together? Zero. How about we swap in Zinchenko for Timber. Zero. Havertz for Jesus? Zero. Jorginho for Partey? Still Zero.
If you can only avoid being overrun when you have a clean bill of health - you a pretty limited Manager.
It only means they were never clever enough to allow opposition to do that, knowing it is all low quality shots.Crazy stat on sky just now.
Klopp has faced 20+ shots just 2 times in 322 games.
Ten Hag 12 in 64!
Arteta 7 in 161
Pep 4 in 292.
Low quality shots create turnovers in possession which can then in turn be used to create from an offensive transition (counter) it’s what we did against Luton.It only means they were never clever enough to allow opposition to do that, knowing it is all low quality shots.
Yeah I hope they don't realise this tactic before we reap the rewards.It only means they were never clever enough to allow opposition to do that, knowing it is all low quality shots.
You can't just say "failed" for every single player in every single season, that would be a relegation team.
They failed given the context and expectations of being key players in the Man Utd team.
How many more managers will we have before somebody cottons onto the common theme on the last 10 years?
I really hope INEOS have the backbone to support the manager and shake up or ship out our squad of snowflakes.
How many more managers will we have before somebody cottons onto the common theme on the last 10 years?
I really hope INEOS have the backbone to support the manager and shake up or ship out our squad of snowflakes.
Do you think we have brought in players over the past 10 years that are of the required quality?Do you think the squad we have now is the same one we had 10 years ago or something?
Obviously not, but they are not all ETH’s either.Do you think the squad we have now is the same one we had 10 years ago or something?
Moyes, Mourinho, LVG, Carrick, McKenna, Solskjaer, Rangnick and ETH can’t all be ‘shit managers’ and indeed have proven so at other clubs.Stop hiring shit managers.
Genius, innovative, bold.Low quality shots create turnovers in possession which can then in turn be used to create from an offensive transition (counter) it’s what we did against Luton.
To be fair, which one of the above would you choose as manager for Real Madrid right now, for example. Nobody. I think they are all a bit shit. Past their time or not good enough when we appointed them.Moyes, Mourinho, LVG, Carrick, McKenna, Solskjaer, Rangnick and ETH can’t all be ‘shit managers’ and indeed have proven so at other clubs.
Moyes, Mourinho, LVG, Carrick, McKenna, Solskjaer, Rangnick and ETH can’t all be ‘shit managers’ and indeed have proven so at other clubs.
So the common factor here is Manchester United.
They failed given the context and expectations of being key players in the Man Utd team.
How many more managers will we have before somebody cottons onto the common theme on the last 10 years?
I really hope INEOS have the backbone to support the manager and shake up or ship out our squad of snowflakes.
Missed this earlier. Spot on.It is unprecedented the amount of teams that have played us this season and have matter of factly stated how they went about dismantling us, and it is said with such clarity that there is no doubt whatsoever we've been turned over by superior tactics, planning and execution, often with players far, far inferior and less regarded than our own.
Post-game it should always be a strong topic of conversation; the word embarrassing has been misused on the Internet for as long as I can remember, but when supposed inferior coaches and players are able to state with such certitude how they have found themselves winning against you, it's a disgrace and an embarrassment.
Ole got absolutely pilloried for the final run that led to his sacking, with the likes of Troy Deeney declaring, in this same great detail, how and why they beat us, yet we're seeing it so often now, it barely warrants discussion amongst the fanbase.
It's one thing to lose games once in a while, it's a wholly different thing when teams play against you with conviction and certainty of purpose because they feel they have you sussed and have a collective, tactical goal to hammer home. Lesser teams than yourself should never have such overwhelming collective confidence in making you crack, or in outright out-strategising you. Sure, they may win on the crest of a wave and in-game flow, but their first priority should be staying in the game and the second, avoiding a demoralising tonking. Look at how teams approach those in the top 4 and even the collective shock they have when they get anything out of those games and contrast it to us. Manchester United are viewed as a team they can play and have genuine hope against, and with how often our dire midfield set up is strolled through compared to other sides, you can see where that well of belief and conviction or sense of purpose teams have when they play us comes from.
I don't even wish to cite the halcyon days of Fergie, where teams absolutely feared a pasting from us, rather, you can look to even LVG, Mourinho and even Ole (before the wheels came off) and see that standards and expectations are rock bottom now.
Under LVG, for as boring and staid as the football could have been called, teams getting the ball of us or having any concerted period of time with it was utterly exasperating and demoralising for them. He might have bored our fans to death, but he also absolutely crushed the spirit of the opposition, particularly fodder.
Mourinho and his rubbish, bruiser boy football made games about attrition and hardship, putting opposing teams through the grinder (oo err); it took genuine quality and superiority to beat us then.
Ole's teams were basic but without a smirk, one of the best counter-attacking teams in Europe, let alone the league. You could know exactly what we set out to do in Ole's first two seasons and still not be able to stop it. We carried a clear and apparent threat and there was little to be done to stop it.
Fast forward to now? We aren't good at anything. The vaunted pressing data that stops only at the initial press but omits the fallout and yawning chasms in midfield it causes counts for nothing - if your biggest so-called strength is an inlet to your biggest weaknesses, it is categorically not a strength. We cannot defend set pieces; we are dire at attacking set pieces; we do not control games and we do not have an overabundance of supplying the frontline, further, we rely on individual brilliance at a higher rate than Ole did, something Ole was absolutely dragged through the coals for.
Not one of the managers post-Fergie has been good enough or complete, but this is par with Moyes for zero discernible strengths and an abundance of weaknesses.
Ten Hag was quite infamous for vastly overplaying his first xi at Ajax, so much so it was the biggest warning Ajax supporters gave us. What seems to have happened here is that in the absence of a strongest xi, the manager is lost at sea - if everything is not functioning to the wire with optimum efficiency, he doesn't know what to do and cannot use viable workarounds, which sees us doggedly sticking to 'the plan' because without it, at it's optimal best, there's nothing. It's such a letdown.
The conceptualisation of the "modern manager" is someone who is eclectic with contingencies for most things and a clever counter plan prepared in advance should the initial one be breached - you certainly should not hear of opposing players and managers stating how easy it was to do their thing against them. The biggest surprise and letdown of ten Hag's tenure for me is that he has been the antithesis of modernisation, entrenched and unadaptible as he is. By now, there is only Moyes who it might be argue has been more outcoached than ten Hag. Never in my life did I think I'd ever say that about an appointment I was so eager for.
It's like Black Mirror episode by now. You don't need to look beyond the pitch to see this is not and will not be the guy.
Obviously not, but they are not all ETH’s either.
Somehow when a manager is on thin ice it always comes back to downing tools, players not respecting/responding to the manager, players questioning tactics/training etc.
It seems to be an engrained culture at the club, like the moment SAF left the building for the last time they players all breathed out and it infects every fecker we sign.
Something else needs to change because we’ve changed the manager time and time again and we always end up back here.
Bald is best mother feckers! Stick with Erik, he will see is right!
Two decent wins, good performances and plenty of goals. Who’d have thought missing our best players would have impacted our performances and it might not be the manager? Football, bloody hell.
Liverpool's squad was far shitter when Klopp took over, too.Crazy stat on sky just now.
Klopp has faced 20+ shots just 2 times in 322 games.
Ten Hag 12 in 64!
Arteta 7 in 161
Pep 4 in 292.
People are defending the indefensible at this point.
To be fair, which one of the above would you choose as manager for Real Madrid right now, for example. Nobody. I think they are all a bit shit. Past their time or not good enough when we appointed them.