- Joined
- Sep 1, 2015
- Messages
- 18,549
- Supports
- ️
I’m glad everyone from all sides of the in out debate is using that info to have a more fair appreciation for our injuries.Literally it takes two seconds to go back and look at what was posted in @BenitoSTARR thread as far as our injury availability to see that actual statistics instead of just saying “X player was out for a long time”. Hence why I boiled it down Licha and the LB’s because there’s no denying both have been unavailable for selection far more than anyone else.
But regardless because you and I are quite clearly on far opposite ends of the spectrum with regards to ETH’s prospects/what he’s done so far and I don’t feel like going through it, I’ll instead ask: What/where do you expect us to be next year if ETH is given yet another summer with INEOS? Because by any conventional wisdom there should be huge improvement in both results and performances in a managers 3rd season with a club especially given the financial outlay. And this is where we differ, because I don’t see another summer where even if we buy and sell well, will change the outlook and have us competing with Arsenal and Liverpool and going toe to toe given the evidence I’ve seen so far. Hence why I want him gone, because I don’t feel like wasting more money on a managers project that doesn’t seem to have a ceiling past top 4 challengers.
I feel as a club we’ve become far too willing to give both managers and players “time” instead of being able to see the future outlook isn’t worth it and cutting bait sooner rather than later. It’s one of the (many) reasons we’ve degraded post SAF.
When you say a huge improvement is expected what does that look like?
If we finish behind City, Arsenal and Liverpool but closed the gap and got 4th would that be progress?
For me I’d see that with progress and depending on personnel we might be ready for a title challenge the following season so:
2023/4 - 5th
2024/5 - 4th
2026/6 - reasonable go at a title.
Last edited: