1, 2, 19. Carry no weight now after getting dumped out of an easy CL group in last place, sitting 6 points off the top four on 0 goal difference. 50% win rate this season. 42% defeat rate. They just serve to highlight how far backwards we've gone.
3-6. would have happened regardless, under any manager. Reminiscent of those who used Januzaj to prop up Moyes or Rashford to prop up LVG.
7, 14. Equivalent to Moyes signing and using Fellaini.
10. He maybe dealt with Rashford in terms of standard disciplinary procedures, but currently he's a husk of a player who's rapidly losing value and looks like his career will peter out. No one could say Rashford's wild but oh so predictable decline from last season to this is something that is a plus in the ETH in column.
15. Nothing unprecedented about having a long-term injured centreback and injury prone left back. And relying on two past-their-best Real Madrid players.
16-18. Haven't resulted in football that's good to watch or that gets results. Not to mention so many results ranging from abject and embarrassing to unprecedented disasters.
They still carry weight. Historic performance in better conditions (not every man and his dog injured is relevant).
We’ve struggled this season due to injuries. Since having the players back our record has been:
W 2-4
W 3-4
W 3-0
W 1-2
Any further back and we still had massive injury list.
3-6 don’t happen under every manger and it’s disingenuous to suggest otherwise. Ten Hag gave Mainoo the opportunity in pre season and left a space for him in the squad. He also persisted with Garnacho over other signings even Rashford at key points. And if you read up on Højlund he’s worked a lot with the whole squad to get the best out of him. :
https://theathletic.com/5270471/202...manchester-united/?source=user_shared_articleRasmus Hojlund has gone from no goals in 14 league games to five in five, so what has changed?
7. No other United manager has used McTominay this way. It’s unique to Ten Hag and takes advantage of his talents. We bemoaned McFred and him being played deep as a playmaker and so credit where it’s due. Bringing him on at the times he does with the instructions he does could be considered game changing substitutions. But if we only want to see the negative then no credit is given where it’s due. So by that logic any negative impact from a sub isn’t his fault.
10. He got Rashford playing his best football ever last year. This year I don’t think for one second the fault is with Ten Hag for Rashford clearly having personal issues. When he’s overstepped a boundary it’s been reenforced and dealt with appropriately.
16-18 it’s really hard to play excellent football without excellent players. We’ve had AWB at LB with Evans at CB and Eriksen at CM with Mainoo as recently back as the Spurs game. We’re heading in the right direction we’ve been ridiculously unfortunate.
That's a very good list to have a discussion about, thanks for that! Allow me to go through it and explain why I am not that happy with EtH than you are:
1./2. yes, it was a good first season he had in regard to that. Despite that we had early warning signs - the late drop in form and the inability to win touch away matches.
3./4./5./6. I agree that these players evolved positively and EtH is right to trust them. That's on par with what I expect of a manager, but still good.
7./14. I really have mixed feelings about all this McTominay story. Did he bail out United multiple times? Yes, which is great for him. Did that lead EtH to rely on McTominay to a degree that it hurt how the team actually plays? Sadly yes. McT worked great as an impact sub, and that's absolutely fine to have and use that option. But starting him for this role as a goal-scoring "10" actually hurt the team more than it helped. He simply is not Bellingham who plays exactly this role for Real. For me this is a plus for McTominay, but a minus for EtH.
8./9./10. A bit of mixed feelings. I agree on Ronaldo and Rashford, I am not that sure about Sancho, because the whole Sancho at United saga is weird. Something really went wrong with him, and I really are not sure what it actually was. So I just exclude that one player issue from my EtH rating.
11. Hm... at times it did feel quite the opposite. He seems to have gotten things right, but often only after a long time. Definitely not a plus in my book. I simply trust every run of the mill manager to do this to a similar or better degree.
12./13. Just no. Yes, these two are good signings, but mentioning them is just cherrypicking. Overall EtH signed to many players who are not up to the required standard or don't really fit the team, that recruitment overall is a clear minus for me.
15. Real Madrid just took over the lead in La Liga by convincingly beating the former leaders Girona. The twist? All their CBs were injured. Yes, United had a lot of injuries and that of course has an impact, but this stuff about "unprecedented injuries" isn't that simple. Would Mainoo have gotten as many minutes without Casemiro's injury? I doubt it. My stance on this simply is: United is one of the most financially powerful teams in the world and continued to build the team in EtH's mind after a good first season. Qualifying for the CL again is the absolute minimum in this case and the only reason why it's justified to not immediately sack him right now for the league position is this injury crisis. Still also this just seems to be on par and not anything special for me.
16. How do you know? Was there a single match with everyone fit?
17. That's statistically true. It's however a disaster how little this is converted into goals.
18. I guess you can count this as a plus. Seems however to be a minor detail and therefore a bit cherrypicked (like the signings)
19. That's bolstered by his good first season and not that indicative of what he is doing now. Also he has a quite bad loss % as well, his approach simply doesn't lead to draws. Which is a valid philosophical choice, but means that his points per match are not outstanding and losing many matches is quite terrible for cup competitions (funny how he won a cup nonetheless, but it showed in the CL this season).
So overall I agree on some points, but I think some don't look that great when looking at their context and some are just cherrypicking.
For what it’s worth I appreciate your posts. You’re critical but you at least give an explanation of your reasoning (even though I may disagree with it) so thank you.
1-2 We’ve just won a couple of tough away fixtures.
3/4/5/6 - Glad we agree and yeah to be fair I’d hope a good manager could help young players develop. It’s still a positive though.
7/14 - McTominay has been a necessity due to injury. Not a long term solution. I see it more as we had limited options and without Hojlund he was a needed physical threat.
8 - Sancho basically called him a liar in public. Ten Hags original comment is no worse than any I’ve seen by widely accepted elite mangers like Pep and Klopp. Sancho clearly hasn’t been professional and needs holding to account. We are not responsible for others behaviour only how we handle it. ETH sent a clear message. No matter the price tag, it’s not acceptable.
11 - He didn’t let Ronaldo (who was a knob) walk over him, he’s not let Sancho, Rashford or any other player do so either. He’s also allowed those like Maguire to come back when they’ve shown the level required (and Maguire got MOTM last game). He’s stuck by old enough if good enough mentality too.
12/3 - Recruitment the players I’d class as proper signings are:
Martinez
Højlund
Mount
Onana
Antony
The rest have been stop gaps or clear club signings and it’s a complete myth to suggest that any manager has a success rate much higher than the above.
15 - Real Madrid have been dominating European football for the last 10-15 year with a settled manager and project. We aren’t at their level in terms of how our squad is built. They just have better players in midfield, and attack. Far superiorThey have a squad that even when playing with those injuries had:
Lunin
Vazquez Tchouameni Carvajal Mendy
Kroos
Valverde Camavinga
Bellingham
Rodrygo Vinicius
16 - The matches where we had Martinez, Shaw and Casemiro with Onana (especially those with Mainoo we’ve been much better.
17 - I agree we absolutely need to turn more of those opportunities into goals but we’ve got a young striker in his debut season and a 18/9 year old winger playing RW for the first time in his career.
18 - The other poster was critical of me not including more tactical changes so I can’t win either way here. But I could if people wanted to a longer thread (and it would have to be a thread) on the tactical changes and benefits ten hag has brought to expand on these points.
19 - Or you could argue it’s being unfairly tarnished this season by an unprecedented difficult set of circumstances and when he’s got everyone back fit it’ll revert back to his record win % which 4 wins in 4 would suggest might be the case.
You have too much time on your hands. Do you support the club or the manager? Get some perspective. Things are a bit better, some encouraging sings. Lots of problems. Managing a club like United is tough, that goes without saying.
Some of your list is simply lies. There was a list shown on Sunday in the Arsenal games for top six teams for high
Its honestly pathetic that fans get so obsessed with a manager. Lets see stuff happen on the pitch and then get excited. One minutes its not ETH's fault we signed Antony for £80m and the fact that he's crap, now he's great for signing Martinez and Hojlund. It can't be celebrate the successes and ignore the failures. Similarly, Mainoo has been in the youth system since age 9, and the first team squad full time since this summer. ETH was keen to sell McT this summer (and would have signed Amrabat permanently if we had), he's horribly overplayed mcT in midfield and now realises he's at best an impact sub. The list is basically the in tray for a MUFC manager. Get over it.
I support the club. Especially through its most trying times like having your defence, midfield and key attackers out injured for over half the season.
In fact challenge for you:
- Name United’s strongest current XI
- Count how many times we’ve played that side this season.
I’m glad we can agree Ten Hag is doing the job of United manager.
Mate I comprehended it just fine, I just thought you were stretching it a bit. Only two of them were actual tactical reasons in response to the other poster.
Do you want a full tactical breakdown of Ten Hag and the changes he’s made to our play?
If I do that and show you where he’s improved us are you a) going to read it and watch it and b) be open to accepting those facts?