He hasn't got a title winning team. You can't exepct title winning point tally from here ill the end of the season.
He has the fourth best team in the league, easily. If we give to him amnesty for burning half a season, then he should give us reward for being great in the other half.
So essentially for me it is:
Great half followed by great half -> awesome manager, we likely win the league and not cause of a fluke, build the man a statue.
One great half one ok half -> we compete for the title but likely don't win it, great manager.
two ok halves (last season) -> on par with what you expect, probably won't win against Pep/Klopp with this squad, but if you give him better players, he might compete. Deserves another shot.
one bad half and one great half -> needs to improve consistency, deserves another shot
one bad half, one ok half (what you are wishing to happen) -> why we should continue the experiment, his top is just ok, and his bottom is terrible. That's kinda worse than Ole/Mourinho/LvG whom for most part were two ok halves, and we sacked them for not being good enough.
two bad halves -> should have been sacked 6 months ago, bad manager (for this club)
For me, the bolded one is the only scenario when we should give him the third season.
I actually expect that the second bolded will happen.
-----
In any case, 2pp/game is not enough in the second season, after 400m spent, and no UCL/League Cup. That is what he achieved last season. The deal was that we should improve this season, not go sideways for half a season and burn in the other half. Saying that, I think that the decision is a bit more complex. If we get 2p/game, we should look at how that happened. Playing good football, winning against Villa/Brighton away, defeating the likes of Spurs/Arsenal at home, but occasionally inconsistent. Sure, would be interesting to see how he does in his third season. Getting jammy wins we did not deserve (with McTominay goals in extra time
) and thus winning most games, while getting annihilated by good squads? Nope.