Ah yes, because a team who wins a CL and then a Premier League 'falling apart' in one season due to injuries is equivalent to a team winning a league cup and then having their worst ever PL season due to 'injuries'. If Liverpool 'failed with a better team, then our 'failure' should be expected. No one here is saying we should be top of the table, but we're utterly woeful. 13th in xPTs. Negative GD in the league. Last in an easy CL group. Negative GD in the league over the last 38 or so games. Attacking metrics all in the bottom half of the table. 22 goals in 20 league games. Up there with relegation fodder for goals scored. Zero wins away from home vs a decent side. I mean how do you look at those
facts, and still defend him?
You guys are all living in dream land. This is the crux of the issue. You're all vehemently trying to defend the 'messiah' that you're ignoring all facts and tangible evidence.
It's not even that we're doing worse than last season. This is the worst season in our modern history and people are just bringing up every possible excuse. Every club has injuries. No top manager(which ETH is not) would manage the car crash that ETH has managed this season.
And the excuse should be brushed aside. We barely scored goals in the league last season and if Rashford didn't have a career best season, ETH is likely without a job at the moment.
He has simply failed at every facet of his job. Are we a better side now than when Ole got sacked? No, we're actually much worse despite the outlay on the squad since then and ETH having 18 months on the job.
Our fanbase is too desperate for another SAF-like manager and some on here probably thought ETH would manage us for 10+ years. Of all the fanbases, this should be the one to understand just how important and pivotal a manager is to a squad. Yet, we're probably the worst collectively in recognizing when a manager is good enough or not. And ironically, the manager that's been defended by the posters most in here is arguably our worst manager post-SAF.