TrebleChamp99
Incorrectly predicted ten Hag’s departure
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2021
- Messages
- 1,261
Utter BS source and complete nonsense but first article of its kind is out.
We stop losing games?
One of the biggest issues is the expectation of us as fans, not accepting the reality of where we are currently. Instead, we hang on to past memories of what we once were, which causes us to dissect every piss poor performance and apportion blame. We are a midtable team with midtable players who have a midtable mentality, which produces midtable performances and results.18-24 months from now they’ll be a new thread, [INSERT NAME] - Manchester United manager and it’ll be the same because he’s not the only thing that would have to go for things to change.
Ratcliffe and Co have a huge fecking job.
Well we're losing games now so the worst we can do is continue to lose games.Sadly, that’s not guaranteed
Utter BS source and complete nonsense but first article of its kind is out.
They were good enough for a cup win last season. 'These players' aren't as bad as they're being made to look.With these players? Doubt it.
They have a huge job picking the right manager if Eth can't turn things around.
I know this club isn't familiar with change because of having one man in charge for such a period of time but how many competitive clubs across Europe have had one coach in charge in excess of five years ? It's a very minimal figure. I think where fans look at LVG, Jose, Ole and Ragnick as a negative impetus on the club, I see a scenario where it's going to take a special manager to rejuvenate United.
I think everyone including SAF underestimated what it takes to manage a club of this magnitude.
The only condition Potter should step foot in OT is on an interim basis, apart from that, making him full time would be an absolute disaster.Graham Potter is the English Erik ten Hag. You're getting the same level of big club cluelessness in a different nationality.
But whatever, if the club wants to try it, let's see what changes.
They were good enough for a cup win last season. 'These players' aren't as bad as they're being made to look.
That's the thing though isn't it? We don't have to hire a manager that will rejuvenate the club, just hire a manager that will get the team back on track then fire him and hire someone else when the team is at a point where it is ready to compete for major honours. It doesn't matter if you have to cycle through multiple managers to get there, just have a plan that isn't "We need you to carry the entire club for the next 25 years"They have a huge job picking the right manager if Eth can't turn things around.
I know this club isn't familiar with change because of having one man in charge for such a period of time but how many competitive clubs across Europe have had one coach in charge in excess of five years ? It's a very minimal figure. I think where fans look at LVG, Jose, Ole and Ragnick as a negative impetus on the club, I see a scenario where it's going to take a special manager to rejuvenate United.
I think everyone including SAF underestimated what it takes to manage a club of this magnitude.
No. He is a good coach and a master tactician. Which is his job.So, Ancelotti’s success is purely down to those above him? Right. And former B team manager and player Pep Guardiola should never have been given the chance then as he was’t good enough?
Utter BS source and complete nonsense but first article of its kind is out.
And establish a status quo in the dressing room that you only have to wait a while and you’ll get your way.Well we're losing games now so the worst we can do is continue to lose games.
Utter BS source and complete nonsense but first article of its kind is out.
Yeah but did Neville beat Villa, Burnley, Charlton, Nottingham Forest and Newcastle to win a league cup?
Obviously BS clickbait.
Zidane has turned us down before, why would he say yes now? He has been out of management for over two years as well, so either he is waiting for the right job or has little interest.
Potter and Lopetegui....come on
Zerbi is the only one, but I fail see in a month of Sundays why he'd be interested.
Obviously BS clickbait.
Zidane has turned us down before, why would he say yes now? He has been out of management for over two years as well, so either he is waiting for the right job or has little interest.
Potter and Lopetegui....come on
Zerbi is the only one, but I fail see in a month of Sundays why he'd be interested.
The starting 11 last season.
DDG-leftsold by ETH personally, not the club
AWB- been injured sometimes, dropped sometimes
Varane-constantlyinjured sometimes, dropped sometimes, possibly fell out with the manager
Martinez- been injured most of the season.
Shaw- been injuredmost of seasonsometimes
Casemiro- injured most of the season, asked to play an impossible role at his age, possibly fell out with the manager
Eriksen- constantly injured and ETH decided he's no longer first choice in this new style
Bruno- always available and off form
Antony- he’s had off field issues and had a short break and horribly poor
Martial- constantly injured and just poor
Rashford- not himself and out of form
people wonder why we’re struggling this season and gone backwards. ETH needs his players back.
No. He is a good coach and a master tactician. Which is his job.
He is not a scout though, why he should be? The coach not being a scout has been the default scenario outside of England for many decades.
Bayern were not out off form last night. They were proving to their fan's they can be proffessional, after the Frankfurt debacle. The dead rubber argument is bollocks. Thus if you seriously believe a Bayern team being proffesional can break a sweat vs a United team starting without 10 first teamers and in current form. You have serious issues. End of story.
It's the softest run I've seen in a long time. We'd have rightly taken the piss out of City if they won the cup with that level of competition.You said that like it was an achievement. It's a cup competition the lesser of the cups although a cup is a cup and airways good to win.
Newcastle were on their third choice keeper and have clearly shown they are better than us when we have faced them under Ten Hag but on the day they were worse than us and Casemiro stood up and made the difference like players of his kind are supposed to do.
Take away that and his record since that is absolutely dreadful.
I can't believe he would have survived this long at any other club with his record, his non existent style of play, his horrible man management and his disaster signings which are all on him.
We stop losing games?
No. A manager should be able to coach the squad, make tactics, adjust the tactics based on the opponents and develop players. He might also identify weaknesses in the team.Why are you talking about scout? A manager should be able to identify a player‘s qualities and use him for the team he’s building or he’s not being a manager. Players are not foisted upon a manager by the scouting network. I urge you to read any biography of a manager with a modicum of success.
You’d swear he took over a mid table or relegation team, we’d finished 2nd the year before and always hung around top 4 positions, not a league winning team but hardly this catastrophe that is being implied these days to excuse the managerETH took over a broken club and over achieved last season. I think that’s really worked against him as people expect an upward trajectory and can’t manage road bumps like this season.
I don’t dispute the poor performances and the awful season, you can’t argue with what we see. But I really do feel that there’s been plenty of reasons why things were going to be harder this season. I think there’s plenty of non ETH reasons why things have been sh8t and with everything going on any mistake by the manager is causing more problems then A mistake at a club that maybe just has one problem.
Replacimg the manager to me is small fries. It’s looking for short term gain at a club that doesn’t even have a plan at this stage. Nobody can probably even make that call because the ownership situation. How can anybody think that sacking a manager and replacing them with such turmoil and uncertainty would be a good thing.
Id rather they focus in January in offloading martial and anybody, everybdog else who has been a problem. Discount down to get rid and fill the first team with youth and maybe some loanees. Mid table target, no fa cup but go into the summer with an actual plan and a proper blank slate.
Part of our issue I feel has been this pathetic top 4 target that the owners have. When we match it , their spending always stopped. I think ETH has changed tactics, as every United manager has done, because this is the one thing thing that was demanded , top 4. And as such, we see short term changes to the team , short term signings and there’s no long term cohesion.
I don’t want ETH sacked because he’s been perfect, I don’t want him sacked because I think our issues are far higher than any manager in the world can fix. I think if a manager comes in and gets us top 4 it’s the worst thing imaginable as that’s how Ole got the Job and nothing changed.
I dont want mediocrity , I want excellence, I want the club getting the most out of our resource. I don’t see that happening while we focus on managers to make our broken club work. I see the desperation for a new manager as just that, desperation and I think that in this desperation the idea of change , any change, gives a glimmer of hope
But it’s false hope without the infrastructure changes.
I still can’t believe that we finished 4th in a CL group with a Danish & a Turkish team in it. Embarrassing doesn’t even begin to describe it. Hate the idea that not being in Europa is good, we are way past that point now and at least that gives you an extra chance to make the CL. Pathetic
No. A manager should be able to coach the squad, make tactics, adjust the tactics based on the opponents and develop players. He might also identify weaknesses in the team.
A footballing structure which employs dozens of squads, a director of football, some technical directors and a CEO should then find the players and sign them. They are independent of the manager's wishes or requests, because it is understood that they will outlast the manager. It is also understood that coaching is a full time job, thus, the manager has no time on scouting players from all over the world*. As no coincidence, you do not see managers of other big clubs signing 'their own' players. Pep wanted Neymar, Bayern brought him Gotze. He only signed Alcantara who was somehow related to him. And no one else from Spain. When he joined City, he did not sign anyone from his past players (compare to EtH who signed Onana, Antony, Martinez, Amrabat and wanted Timber).
Why on Earth a manager should have a say on whom the club signs or does not sign. I mean, why LVG should have had a say in Shaw who then played for another 4 (soon to be 5) managers. It does not work like this in any other big club except Man United. And actually, it is not football related, in American sports is the same, the coach often hears from media whom the club signed.
* Maybe that is why our squads tend to be severely out-coached compared to almost every other team. I guess the manager is spending time scouting players instead of coaching players.
This season he is like an agglomeration of the worst aspects of all the managers we had. As clueless as Ole, as hopeless as Moyes, as boring as LvG, playing a wannabe suicidal gung ho as Rangnick, and falling out with players as Mourinho.
Without any of the good aspects that some of them brought (magic moments of Ole, organization of LvG, defensive form of Mourinho).
They were good last season? Two cup finals and a 3rd placed finish.Sorry, but this is such a shortsighted viewpoint. So the players suddenly become good do they?
Ten Hag was the correct appointment, I still think that and changing after 18 months is crazy to me.
If and when Ratcliffe joins they feel he’s not going to work in their plans then I would understand.
But I’d hope then whoever they gave the job to would have longer then 18 months.
18 months is more than enough time to show you're on the right track. After 18 months and almost half a billion spent, he's reached a point where we're losing 3-0 at home to Bournemouth (deservedly), finishing bottom of our CL group, and without an away win against a top 12 PL side since he took over. That is atrocious.Sorry, but this is such a shortsighted viewpoint. So the players suddenly become good do they?
Ten Hag was the correct appointment, I still think that and changing after 18 months is crazy to me.
If and when Ratcliffe joins they feel he’s not going to work in their plans then I would understand.
But I’d hope then whoever they gave the job to would have longer then 18 months.
That is more whom not to sign (as a gesture of goodwill of his previous clubs, not whom to sign).You need to read more about how a football club is managed.
https://onefootball.com/en/news/he-...nchester-city-chiefs-transfer-plans-38653096#
Sorry, but this is such a shortsighted viewpoint. So the players suddenly become good do they?
Ten Hag was the correct appointment, I still think that and changing after 18 months is crazy to me.
If and when Ratcliffe joins they feel he’s not going to work in their plans then I would understand.
But I’d hope then whoever they gave the job to would have longer then 18 months.