TsuWave
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2013
- Messages
- 15,574
I do think players have downed tools on him like they have under several other managers
Who are these players?
I do think players have downed tools on him like they have under several other managers
Its crazy how people look at Oles time with rose coloured glasses.100% this.
it's crazy people think otherwise
Who are these players?
Apart from Martinez, everybody else has been shit to questionable.I get the frustration - but I think these two points are both unfair to a degree. We have signed some good players. Last year they worked - this year less so, but most of them have been injured. We have also played some really good football under ETH - not always, but at times.
This is actually correct. From what I've seen, we still rely heavily on the form of our individual players (ie Maguire and Mctominay this season, Rashford and Casemiro last season), rather than our collective style of team play/football system to win games. If thats the way we are going to do it anyway, why not just stick to Ole - at least Ole has been more adventurous in attack and we would score more goals with his team.I'll never take anyone's opinion serious that thinks Ten Hag's football is better than under Ole. Fine to think neither is good enough for where we want to be but this is far worse.
Rashford Sancho Varane and Casemiro is a shadow of the player he was last season.
your statement was "I do think players have downed tools on him like they have under several other managers"
Ten Hag bought Casemiro - he was also one of the good points of last season, which are the several other managers he downed tools under?
Varane came under Ole and was a starter when fit, same under Ten Hag, I doubt anyone can accuse him of downing tools under Ole - albeit he's reportedly fallen out with Ten Hag, reports also express he's happy and adamant he wants to stay at United, which are the several other managers he downed tools under?
Rashford had his best season in terms of output last year, why would he suddenly down tools under the same manager?
Sancho came under Ole and fell out with the manager, which are the several other managers he downed tools under?
Can't it just be that the manager is shit instead of these non-applicable "players have downed tools on him like they have under several other managers" assertions?
Apart from Martinez, everybody else has been shit to questionable.
It’s very simple, a manager who watched us play, set up the team like he did last season to come in the summer and think I need Onana, Mount and Amrabat was an absolute disaster in the making. You just can’t survive that kind of incompetent squad building.
I think whatever has Rashford and Sancho out of the team is what the current malaise is within the squad. If that’s due to not working hard enough or being unprofessional then I am on the managers side to call that out even if it means not getting the best out of the team or upsetting the group. We can never win stuff with players who don’t work hard enough. Is what the manager is delivering now ok? No I am saying above I think he should go but the likes of Rashford and Martial have been here under many managers and they just aren’t good enough over a season to win anything meaningful with them. Even if they won a league you can bet they would be back to walking around the very next season. That’s not the kind of player we should be indulging if we want to set high standards.
I think you're assuming they were all his first choice - which they weren't apart from Mount.
I think you're assuming they were all his first choice - which they weren't apart from Mount.
Was Onana not his first choice?
Hes managed Onana and Amrabat he knew exactly what he was buying
So he vetoed De Gea's contract and had the club chase Onana for a month and spend 50 mil on him, but yeah he was not a first choice or a priority for TH.I don't think a GK was his first choice, period. I reckon he wanted Kane and KMJ, but was told no.
I don't follow your logic.Of course he did, but that doesn't mean they were his first choice.
So he vetoed De Gea's contract and had the club chase Onana for a month and spend 50 mil on him, but yeah he was not a first choice or a priority for TH.
At this point, it's just amusing to see what are the excuses being trotted out for the manager who has done excruciatingly poor.
I don't follow your logic.
You meant it's reasonable for ETH to fail to implement a proper sustainable system just because ETH's first choice were such as unobtainable/unavailable players like FDJ and Allison. You can get the best recruitment set up in the world, it still means jackshite when your manager is adamant on certain unobtainable players.
Who were ETH first choices again?
The context was pretty clear. You posted, and I quote "I don't think a GK was his first choice, period."Context is useful here - I'm not denying the poor form and underachievement. I was responding to someone who said all the signings were poor. I disagree. They've been poor this season for various reasons, but Case, Martinez, Eriksen were all excellent for us for most of last season.
Why shouldn't we do that? Real Madrid does, Bayern does. Even Chelsea does and they've won the league and CL twice since we've last won them.Can anyone wanting him sacked suggest a) what the club should do to replace him and b) what the club should do to break this cycle of sacking managers every few years once they start to underperform?
The context was pretty clear. You posted, and I quote "I don't think a GK was his first choice, period."
What in my response was not related to that? The guy has done a worse job in squad building than all the managers before him. 90mil on Antony, 60 on Mount, 50 for Onana, 75 on Hojlund.
Those are all eye watering insane sums to pay, and that is before you take into consideration he has managed all but the last one on that list earlier. Clearly shows he has no idea of what are the type of players this team needs to progress and he cannot even get the best out of the players he bought.
Can anyone wanting him sacked suggest a) what the club should do to replace him and b) what the club should do to break this cycle of sacking managers every few years once they start to underperform?
If not ETH then his agent: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...ency-Rasmus-Hojlund-Sofyan-Amrabat-moves.htmlSo you think it's ETH negotiating those fees? As for your list of failures, Mount has been injured and could yet be a good player for us and Hojlund will be a star for us, I'm sure.
Mount will not be a good player for us. Hojlund will just be ok. ETH has made shocking signings. Does he inspire us, team, fans ? NO. He is not the man to take us forwardSo you think it's ETH negotiating those fees? As for your list of failures, Mount has been injured and could yet be a good player for us and Hojlund will be a star for us, I'm sure.
I would rehire Ole at this point as an interim just to get rid of these bastards in our team. He knows who are the rats and I would like him to cleanse off the club from them.
I would rehire Ole at this point as an interim just to get rid of these bastards in our team. He knows who are the rats and I would like him to cleanse off the club from them.
In your opinion, what can be coached?The decision making on field, in the moment, is down to the quality of the individuals. An obvious example is attackers not seeing the best ball or shooting when they should pass. These wrong decisions are not being coached. The right decisions are being coached but the players are not good enough to consistently implement what they are being instructed to do.
Stating the obvious here but you can’t coach Bebe to be Giggs or Cleverley to be Scholes even though they were at the same club and had the same manager.
With drilling and experience, Dalot, and the rest of them will start to make more good decisions but most of them are fundamentally below the calibre required and you just can’t blame that on coaching.
EtH makes loads of mistakes I’m sure but a lot of what the players do is just down to their ability.