Erik ten Hag | 2022/23 & 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
In fairness though ETH won us our first trophy for a good while last season, and simultaneously got us back in the CL. It's not like he's achieved absolutely nothing so far, and people are just blindly affording him time like with Moyes and Ole. He's obviously not earned infinite time, but it's obvious there are mitigating factors to our collapse this season out of his control also.

He got top 4 and won League Cup. Our previous managers got same results or even more and got sacked. LVG was sacked few days after winning the Fa Cup. Ten Hag performed nearly nearly at the same standards as the previous managers whom were deemed a failure.
 
It's actually not. Bar Moyes, everyone of them got at least 2 full years. Changing managers every 2 to 3 years is pretty normal and nothing outrageous. We should have actually sacked and hired more managers in such period considering our results.
Chelsea, Real Madrid, and Barcelona have had more managers than us in the past decade. All three have won far more than we have. Do those three clubs have shit structures because they've gone through so many managers?

A good structure allows managers to come and go without it constantly being a major disruption.

The lack of structure at United has meant every new manager has been a major disruption.

The two Spanish clubs have definitely had football structures in place. It appeared Chelsea did too before the sale.

Additionally, Madrid have had six permanent managers in the same time, but Ancelotti and Zidane account for four of them.

The point isn't managers changing while maintaining success either. That's what a good structure gets you. The point is changing the managers time and again for failing indicates the problem isn't just bad managers.
 
A good structure allows managers to come and go without it constantly being a major disruption.

The lack of structure at United has meant every new manager has been a major disruption.

The two Spanish clubs have definitely had football structures in place. It appeared Chelsea did too before the sale.

Additionally, Madrid have had six permanent managers in the same time, but Ancelotti and Zidane account for four of them.

The point isn't managers changing while maintaining success either. That's what a good structure gets you. The point is changing the managers time and again for failing indicates the problem isn't just bad managers.

The amount of times you have said "structure" in your post proves it me it's mostly a strawman argument. Good luck finding that "structure".
 
Stop saying thought terminating nonsense like this. Deal with the reality of what IS rather than what should be. The reality is that Ten Hag controls transfer policy, he should be criticised for his piss poor transfers. You can't do that because you've put all your eggs in the Ten Hag basket.

You can criticise both.

Ten Hag is clearly not cut out to be responsible for transfers, and it's fine to point out his targets have largely been poor.

However, it remains true that the ultimate failing there is the lack of structure that gave him such responsibility in the first place.
 
He got top 4 and won League Cup. Our previous managers got same results or even more and got sacked. LVG was sacked few days after winning the Fa Cup. Ten Hag performed nearly nearly at the same standards as the previous managers whom were deemed a failure.

LVG got sacked for finishing outside the top four, which I imagine will be the case with ETH if we continue free falling.
 
The amount of times you have said "structure" in your post proves it me it's mostly a strawman argument. Good luck finding that "structure".

You don't know what a strawman is.

You hardly seem to know what football is.
 
You can criticise both.

Ten Hag is clearly not cut out to be responsible for transfers, and it's fine to point out his targets have largely been poor.

However, it remains true that the ultimate failing there is the lack of structure that gave him such responsibility in the first place.
No, because there is only one reality, and that is that Ten Hag controls transfers. How can you criticise him not controlling it :lol:.
 
The amount of times you have said "structure" in your post proves it me it's mostly a strawman argument. Good luck finding that "structure".

You don't believe that good structures exist, and bad ones don't affect the manager in any way?
 
No, because there is only one reality, and that is that Ten Hag controls transfers. How can you criticise him not controlling it :lol:.

That's not what "both" refers to.

You can criticise Ten Hag's control of transfers and criticise the club for giving him that control.

However, the bigger failing is the club's, not Ten Hag's.
 
You don't believe that good structures exist, and bad ones don't affect the manager in any way?
If Ten Hag had bought mostly good players no one would be discussing structure. Because he's awful, it's used to absolve of him of blame.
 
That's not what "both" refers to.

You can criticise Ten Hag's control of transfers and criticise the club for giving him that control.

However, the bigger failing is the club's, not Ten Hag's.
No, the bigger failing is Ten Hag. You only use this to absolve him of blame.
 
No, the bigger failing is Ten Hag. You only use this to absolve him of blame.

We've had the same failing from multiple managers. The bigger failing is clearly the club's for repeatedly putting their managers in that situation, when it's completely different to how basically every other modern club operates.
 
You don't believe that good structures exist, and bad ones don't affect the manager in any way?
Structures exist and matter, but it's way overblown to the point some think it totally absolves a managers responsibilies. Players can't shoot? Bad structure. Players can't pass? Bad structure. Knocked out of our CL group? Bad structure.

Utter bollocks really. Ten Hag and the coaching team he's employed are responsible for the abysmal football on display
 
You don't believe that good structures exist, and bad ones don't affect the manager in any way?

Structure doesn't coach the players. United's coaching and tactics are terrible and that's down to the managers.
 
Grand, so Pep could come in and have this lot playing like peak Barca after a few weeks without having to change one player?

There is a middle ground between "losing every other game" and "playing like peak Barca with literally any player."

Guardiola would be doing much better with this team.

Even In his allegedly bad first season at City they finished with 78 points and a +41 goal difference.
 
How much time and how many resources are we going to waste on this guy?

Just going to let him decimate the squad and set us back years with terrible decisions and even worse coaching.
 
If Ten Hag had bought mostly good players no one would be discussing structure. Because he's awful, it's used to absolve of him of blame.

The point is though, not every manager is cut out for that role, even the greatest to grace the game don't get licence to hand pick their own players but I don't agree it should absolve ETH from all blame. It's still a valid criticism of our erratic structure though. LVG and Mourinho couldn't even manage it.
 
There is a middle ground between "losing every other game" and "playing like peak Barca with literally any player."

Guardiola would be doing much better with this team. In his allegedly bad first season at City they finished with 78 points and a +41 goal difference.

Guardiola inherited a squad built for his arrival and had won two league titles in recent memory.
 
Stop saying thought terminating nonsense like this. Deal with the reality of what IS rather than what should be. The reality is that Ten Hag controls transfer policy, he should be criticised for his piss poor transfers. You can't do that because you've put all your eggs in the Ten Hag basket.
It's one thing to acknowledge that ETH is poor at recruitment, it's another thing entirely to lay the blame on ETH. The blame for ETH having control over transfers is 100% on the club I.e. Arnold and Murtough.
 
Guardiola inherited a squad built for his arrival and had won two league titles in recent memory.

Spent 2 years building it for him and he still spent about a billion to bring it up to his standards across the pitch.
 
There's nothing there when we have the ball.

Give it to Maguire, hope he can hit a diagonal to Garnacho/Reguilon. Hope they can hit a decent cross. Ball gets cleared. Repeat.

Everyone runs away from the ball. No one is interested in making good passing angles. Mount and McT doing the usual, hiding behind Luton players.

This amateur hour approach to football only works when you have world class wingers who can create something out of nothing a few times every game.
 
There's absolutely no patterns of play to be seen anywhere. Alarming that we're at home to Luton and the passing and movement looks like 'express yourself' more than the likes of Ole ever forced on us.
 
Structure doesn't coach the players. United's coaching and tactics are terrible and that's down to the managers.
It all ties together. ETH has himself said that Man Utd don't have players that can play his proffered style. That's on the club.
 
Structure doesn't coach the players. United's coaching and tactics are terrible and that's down to the managers.

So the other question is, do you believe that every single manager that's come after SAF has been a terrible coach, with terrible tactics. That includes Rangnick who had a reputation for popularising "gegenpressing" as we see it today.
 
It's one thing to acknowledge that ETH I'd poor at recruitment, it's another thing entirely to lay the blame on ETH. The blame for ETH having control over transfers is 100% on the club I.e. Arnold and Murtough.

There's a weird collective on here who are completely blinkered when it comes to the structural failings at the club.

They'll accuse others of expecting every manager we hire of becoming SAF with enough time, while simultaneously arguing that every manager we hire should be able immediately turn around performances and completely shape the club into an attacking powerhouse within two seasons.
 
Yeah just get Diego Simone if your going to ever sack him. (Hope they wont but we wouldnt know). He would be a perfect manger. His tactics would actually suit the PL.
 
It all ties together. ETH has himself said that Man Utd don't have players that can play his proffered style. That's on the club.

That's his job coaching the players how to play his style, not to buy a full new team who could play that style.
 
When you are blaming every single other person in the club bar the manager, to the point of blaming the board for the manager's terrible transfers, you don't actually need to tell us directly that you think he's faultless. You are alreading doing everything to prove it.

That’s such nonsense but I get why you can’t see past this narrative.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.