rimaldo
All about the essence
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2008
- Messages
- 44,145
- Supports
- arse
glenn mcgrath turning in his grave that, that’s not out.
Australia are just an insanely lucky cricket team. That has probably never happened to stokes before
Looking at the rain radar and this match won’t finish.
Says the guy who supports the team that won the world cup of one of the least likely events on a cricket field.
Thats such an original reply mate. Never heard this one before
Because it calls you out clearly as a hypocrite when you spout BS. Aussies are assholes and very good, not especially lucky.
What are you using? Met office says no rain after 2.30 in central London.Yeah, if it's accurate it will be a draw. rain between 2 to 4pm.
That was poor from stokes more than aussie being lucky. Last test yes they were lucky. But then England were lucky it rained yesterday when it rained.How is it bullshit. No one in their right minds would argue that England didn’t get lucky in that final. Australia got away with a ridiculous draw in the last test after being pummelled thanks to the rain and then this happens which is exactly what happened with Gibbs
What are you using? Met office says no rain after 2.30 in central London.
Google gibbs Steve waugh.
Don't remind us, FFS ladsMemories flood back of that Herschelle Gibbs drop vs Australia in '99....
Eh? Glen McGrath is alive and well...glenn mcgrath turning in his grave that, that’s not out.
I was using the met office radar. Definitely says we’re due a bit now, but not 2 hours worth.I’m looking at the radar real time and it’s going to poor down intensively for 2 hours or so south of the river.
Not sure you've worded that correctly. Annoyingly, they've been the best team in cricket for the majority of my cricket watching lifetime/the last 3 decades or so - no luck needed.Australia are just an insanely lucky cricket team. That has probably never happened to stokes before
Not sure you've worded that correctly. Annoyingly, they've been the best team in cricket for the majority of my cricket watching lifetime/the last 3 decades or so - no luck needed.
I was using the met office radar. Definitely says we’re due a bit now, but not 2 hours worth.
Written by a child?Australia are just an insanely lucky cricket team. That has probably never happened to stokes before
Can be both, sure, hence i argued you could probably have worded it better. Everyone in sport is kinda lucky. Anyway, semantics.You can be both. It’s not mutually exclusive. England were the best team in ODI for 4 years and then had a lot of luck in the World Cup final
Exactly. Fans just get butthurt when their team are on a losing end.Can be both, sure, hence i argued you could probably have worded it better. Everyone in sport is kinda lucky. Anyway, semantics.
At least they got to have their lunch.
Spirit of Cricket only applies when it's against England. Come on, you know that.If the ''Spirit of Cricket'' means so much to England, surely Stokes wouldn't review a not out call for a catch he clearly dropped.
No, by someone who knows bugger all about cricketWritten by a child?
Yeah it was an oddly worded post, moreso when you consider Australia's dominance in the sport over the past 3 decades or so. Especially cricket, everyone's received the rub of the green, or the rain or something favourable!Exactly. Fans just get butthurt when their team are on a losing end.
No, by someone who knows bugger all about cricket
Yeah it was an oddly worded post, moreso when you consider Australia's dominance in the sport over the past 3 decades or so. Especially cricket, everyone's received the rub of the green, or the rain or something favourable!
Now one thing i can say is that we (South Africa!) have been tremendously unlucky
If the ''Spirit of Cricket'' means so much to England, surely Stokes wouldn't review a not out call for a catch he clearly dropped.
God I won’t miss reading this dross after today.Spirit of Cricket only applies when it's against England. Come on, you know that.
Yep, no one is challenging that statement bud
Some teams and individuals definitely have more luck than others. The idea that it all equals out in the end is frankly ridiculous, sport is often unfair just like life.Can be both, sure, hence i argued you could probably have worded it better. Everyone in sport is kinda lucky. Anyway, semantics.
They have lost 4/5 tosses. Their biggest luck by far was the rain in the last test.Some teams and individuals definitely have more luck than others. The idea that it all equals out in the end is frankly ridiculous, sport is often unfair just like life.
This was both poor from Stokes and lucky for Australia. Them being a better team overall doesn't change the fact that they've been very fortunate in this series. There was the Smith catch on Root, England being without Wood, Moeen, Archer, Leach and Pope for much or all of the series (despite all the focus on Australia's one injury), the Bairstow runout, the Smith runout and now this.
To use a football analogy Australia are like the Real Madrid of Test cricket in terms of success and having truly great players mixed with the absolutely infuriating out of the ordinary luck of Klopp's Liverpool.
Now that's the funniest thing I ever heard, you know nothing about me or what I know about cricket, which BTW is considerable since I played the game for more than 30 yearsJeez I know more about cricket than you can ever hope to know so please stop with the silly stuff