Ayush_reddevil
Éire Abú
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2014
- Messages
- 11,714
I am more & more convinced that Woakes might bat at 3 tomorrow. Can’t see Stokes or Bairstow doing it and would be madness to move Brook again.
Most likely Moeen will do a Lyon and just stand and slog.I am more & more convinced that Woakes might bat at 3 tomorrow. Can’t see Stokes or Bairstow doing it and would be madness to move Brook again.
I am more & more convinced that Woakes might bat at 3 tomorrow. Can’t see Stokes or Bairstow doing it and would be madness to move Brook again.
Most likely Moeen will do a Lyon and just stand and slog.
Mate I am not English I have no dog in the fight but We are talking about Elite sportsmen here who tend be highly competitive lot due to very nature of their trade and to think they would come up with a deliberate strategy to make themselves look like rank amateurs and silly on the field is just preposterous .You lost the ashes… if anybody should be annoyed about the last game, it was England. Literally played yourself out of any chance knowing the weather issue…
No, they won't risk worse injury doing that, its possible the rest can make the runs. If they think they need some he'll come in at 8 or 9.Most likely Moeen will do a Lyon and just stand and slog.
He can't, with how long he's been off the field.Most likely Moeen will do a Lyon and just stand and slog.
He's been a poor keeper for years not just this series. He can be great with the bat but Foakes would have been a far better pick and he also held up his end batting the last couple of years.
Fine if you can get Bairstow in as a batsman but Foakes is a far superior keeper.
People were applauding Australia ticking along at 2 an over in the morning session and saying they were 'grinding England down': they ended up with roughly the same amount of runs as England, who scored nearly twice as fast.
If Australia had been more positive, they would be comfortably ahead in the game.
Englands bowlers are knackered though as a result, Aussies are relatively fresh. Makes a difference over 5 daysPeople were applauding Australia ticking along at 2 an over in the morning session and saying they were 'grinding England down': they ended up with roughly the same amount of runs as England, who scored nearly twice as fast.
If Australia had been more positive, they would be comfortably ahead in the game.
I agree. I think a similar thing is going on with anderson. He got a wicket yesterday sure but prior to that he looked like he didn’t even want to be out there. He’s worth nothing with the bat and has 1 wicket this whole series. You might say in hindsight this is obvious but it was pretty clear he had nothing to offer after the 2nd test.Totally correct. Selectors should - and could - have found space for Bairstow as a specialist bat, and Foakes as a ‘keeper, bearing in mind his record at Test level is seriously good with the bat anyway.
Bairstow had a very good 2022 but seems to think he has a divine right to the gloves - he doesn’t. At Test level he’s well below par behind the stumps.
They can't fit both in when stokes doesn't bowlTotally correct. Selectors should - and could - have found space for Bairstow as a specialist bat, and Foakes as a ‘keeper, bearing in mind his record at Test level is seriously good with the bat anyway.
Bairstow had a very good 2022 but seems to think he has a divine right to the gloves - he doesn’t. At Test level he’s well below par behind the stumps.
He hasn't been a poor keeper, and whilst Foakes is a quality keeper he isn't far superior to Bairstow in tests.He's been a poor keeper for years not just this series. He can be great with the bat but Foakes would have been a far better pick and he also held up his end batting the last couple of years.
Fine if you can get Bairstow in as a batsman but Foakes is a far superior keeper.
Yes he has been poor. Particularly this series. Foakes is far superior to him with the gloves.He hasn't been a poor keeper, and whilst Foakes is a quality keeper he isn't far superior to Bairstow in tests.
You can't have both in the team and only one suits England style of play and that's Bairstow.
Just the 40 off 5 overs
It reeks of sentimentality keeping Anderson. Josh Tongue was great and took a 5-for at Lords. Selectors really should have kept him in throughout.
Yeah what might have been is definitely the story from the third test onwards
I'd like to see that reverse sweep LBW again - looked out!
It would have been out.
Did they show a replay with DRS and I missed it?
Or the fact England have been superb .
Just wish it hadn't been a fraction too late
In some ways it wasn't - it just rained. Nothing you can do.
In some ways it wasn't - it just rained. Nothing you can do.
From the BBC:
Comparing today's morning session with yesterday's:
Australia scored 54 runs, 41 off the bat, for the loss of one wicket from 26 overs.
England have scored 130 runs, 126 off the bat, for the loss of one wicket from 25 overs.
A good series for Crawley to be fair to him, this must be the first series in a while where there's been no real questions about the openers. Far too early to say they've solved the opening problem but the most promising signs for a long time, the left/right-hand combination and difference in height is also useful.