Terrible outlooks and exxagerated views is your biased opinion just because you either don’t like him or don’t agree with what he says.
It's not biased at all. He says stupid things round the clock and that's quite widely thought of by most people. Of course he has a respectable following because he's entertaining, but he's not got the hype because of his sensible views. Far from.
Half of his super chats are like "can you call my mate a prat for me" because his abuse to the people watching the stream has become a huge selling point. He's just daft all round, thinks he knows about football but changes his mind all the time.
A personal favourite was his anger at people buying United football shirts because it funds the Glazers. The guy is so dim he doesn't know many people get replicas from other mediums
Theres nothing biased about my views by the way. If I think something is shite there isn't an agenda behind it. Not sure why you're trying to dictate that narrative.
It’s very easy to call someone an imbecile and question their credibility while hiding behind a keyboard and an anonymous nickname. A lot harder to put yourself out there and create a show that is followed by over a million people, over many years of hard work and sacrifice.
Firstly Mark Goldbridge isn't even his real name so it's ironic you mentioned anonymous nicknames.
Second, no one is doubting he's done well to get a platform for himself. What I'm saying is, it's based on exaggerated views and entertaining insults. Not actual footballing substance, which is best served on Stretford Paddock or Kick Off.
Mark Goldbridge just gets annoyed and refuses to read chats if people disagree. And his entire show is himself and a bunch of nobodies who nod their heads and agree with him. He can't actually debate with a fellow fan because hel be found out, it's not his forte. His established record isn't on proper footballing views but just exaggerated insults.
That's why that other bloke, his right hand man, left to do his own thing. It's why other platforms like The Kick Off will get Adam Mcola in and not him. It's why Skysports won't turn to him but will go to Stretford Paddock.
Good that you mention Stretford Paddock because it’s also a good channel to follow. They have less followers than Mark but I find the guests that they bring to be equally as good. I wouldn’t call Rio any more meaningful than a Romano or a Christian Falk. I like listening to both and they each bring something different to the table: one is a former player the others are some of the best journos out there.
It’s a matter of taste in the end.
It's not about subscribers is it. It's about content. If you want to see an armchair fan who doesn't go to that many games, sit at home give insults then Goldbridge works. If you want footballing content where they go to all the games, debate with fellow supporters week in week out, and have actual knowledgeable players on the game then go for Paddock.
Paddock have even got time with SAF at his premier for his movie, Skysports turn to them for their fan representation, other platforms like Kick Off debate with them all for one reason. They actually debate football. Right or wrong is another matter I disagree with a lot of what Adam or Steve Howsen say from that show but I respect their views because it's reasonable in the way they discuss it.
Goldbridge though is trash, he's just a guy with a big media following from his puns, insults and rants. Not actual purposeful football talk.
Anyway, this is a Donny thread and I digress.