This truly is tiresome.
So let’s say I am being ‘negative’ & move on. Does it make him less outspoken? No. Does it make VdB’s performances better? No.
You’re trying to subvert my initial post; I’m not sure why it’s relevant whether I’m being ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ about his agent? It’s nonsense so let’s say I am ‘negative’ so you can stick to the topic.
I quoted him, but apparently his own words are an exaggeration of. . . his own words. . .
Again, remember what my original point was, no one said he wasn’t complimentary at some point - I was focused on the ‘promises’. You’re arguing with yourself.
So anytime someone says something about ‘the club’, ‘the club’ has to issue a statement disagreeing?
OgS has already said they’ll be games for the guy. We’re 3 games into the season, it’s hardly a time for his ‘gobshite’ agent to be talking of interest & blocked moves.
If promises were made last year & weren’t kept then he could have asked to leave in the summer, but to hear those promises again this summer & get itchy feet 3 games in isn’t particularly fair to ‘the club’.
How can United be ‘morally’ in the wrong when OgS has said he’ll get games & their are plenty to go. Surely we should give a greater sample than 3 games & actually see if VdB plays well when given an opportunity.
You make some decent points but they lack relevance cause at the core of it we have an agent making public, a private agreement/discussion.
I don’t mind if they talk or stay quiet but the mental gymnastics people are using here doesn’t sit right; VdB doesn’t simply deserve to play.