Dominos
Full Member
Ole doesn't rate him, we should have sold him to make room for a new signing, it's not rocket science.People kicking off in one thread we haven't signed a midfielder and others kicking off in here that we haven't let one go.
Ole doesn't rate him, we should have sold him to make room for a new signing, it's not rocket science.People kicking off in one thread we haven't signed a midfielder and others kicking off in here that we haven't let one go.
You need a squad don't you? He played around 1500 mins last season. He may get more minutes this season. We can't rely on Matic as the sole backup to Fred and McTominay and we already let Garner go.fecking replacement what?
He's not playing any part in the team.
The club should have let him go.
His agent is an idiot for thinking we'd let him go on deadline day without the possibility of getting a replacement
You're speaking to a brick wall when you're dealing with these Ole die-hard fanboys, they won't accept for a second that he ever does anything wrong.If he's not that good then sell him. Sounds like he'd be happy to go.
The problem isn't us not playing him. It's us buying him, not playing him and not selling him for a replacement.
But given we did buy him and haven't sold him, the expectation should be that we actually give him some game time.
It's not like it's been particularly hard to get on the pitch for us so far this season. A past-it Matic managed it, an unfit Martial managed it, a could-have-been-sold Lingard managed it and a has-actually-been-sold James managed it. And in two of the three games we were actually struggling in midfield.
fecking replacement what?
He's not playing any part in the team.
The club should have let him go.
If you're not going to give him any minutes at least fecking stop calling him "Donny".Donny featured in 36 games last season. He's a squad player who's waiting for his chance to solidify a slot in the team. I know that Caf has some sort of victim complex towards this player, but he's not been that great when he's had the chance.
If you're not going to give him any minutes at least fecking stop calling him "Donny".
You're speaking to a brick wall when you're dealing with these Ole die-hard fanboys, they won't accept for a second that he ever does anything wrong.
In their mind it's perfectly logical to
1. Spunk 40m up the wall on a player that you don't rate
2. Refuse to play him
3. Refuse to sell him, so you can keep him around and not play him.
It's shambolic.
You must have forgot last season happened also..Jesus Christ, we've played 3 games lads, chill the feck out. Donny will get minutes this season and loaning him to Everton when we could get no one in, would have been straight up moronic.
It's up to him to take his chance when he does get an opportunity.
That is a perfectly sane perspective to have but is it not also possible that Ole won't sanction him moving because he has been told that he cannot bring anyone in even if he goes. I mean, if I am with a girl who is a 2/10 but the only other option is the palm of my hand I am not going to dump her.
What else do I call him? Dominick? Donny is his name.
Donny van de Beek
He works if we use two 8's, which we haven't been able to do formation wise at any point. We try to fit a square peg in a round hole routinely with Pogba, so when we aren't playing Pogba as one of the 2 holding midfield in a 4-2-3-1 we just play a more defensive mid like Matic, Fred and McTominay.How can someone replace Pogba when he can't get in the team when Pogba isn't even fit.
No offence to the lad but VDB isn't fit to replace Pogba.
Would be daft to think he could
You must have forgot last season happened also..
The point is, if he couldn't get any game time in the first 3 matches given the circumstances, then he isn't getting a look in for the rest of the season except for League Cup games.
1. We were 5-1 up agaisnt Leeds and Matic came off the bench ahead of him.
2. Southampton - Mctominay injured, and Matic got the start ahead of him.
3. Pogba has 5 assists in 2 games from the left, so there's every reason to keep him there and that frees up more opportunities for VDB in midfield. What does Ole do against Wolves? Moves Pogba back to midfield so he doesn't have to play VDB, and plays Dan James out wide instead (who was sold 24 hours later for not being good enough). Mctominay still injured.
Why can't people just accept Ole fecked up massively in his decision to sign him, and compounding that by refusing to sell.
It's just really cringey to act all matey with the name while pretending he's a meaningful squad player when he got half the minutes of Matic and a whopping 4 starts all league season, one of which ended with him getting subbed at HT.What else do I call him? Dominick? Donny is his name.
Donny van de Beek
I just don't see how 3 games is anything to base what's going to happen for the rest of the season. He'll most likely start against Young boys, he'll probably play against West ham in the EFL - heck he may even get a go against Newcastle. If he cant make an impact in those games, that's his own fault.You must have forgot last season happened also..
The point is, if he couldn't get any game time in the first 3 matches given the circumstances, then he isn't getting a look in for the rest of the season except for League Cup games.
1. We were 5-1 up agaisnt Leeds and Matic came off the bench ahead of him.
2. Southampton - Mctominay injured, and Matic got the start ahead of him.
3. Pogba has 5 assists in 2 games from the left, so there's every reason to keep him there and that frees up more opportunities for VDB in midfield. What does Ole do against Wolves? Moves Pogba back to midfield so he doesn't have to play VDB, and plays Dan James out wide instead (who was sold 24 hours later for not being good enough). Mctominay still injured.
Why can't people just accept Ole fecked up massively in his decision to sign him, and compounding that by refusing to sell.
Basically this.The truth is rarely ever admittedly publicly. All we have is speculation as to why United brought in Van de Beek.
The likeliest explanation is that Donny was brought in to succeed Pogba, who was planned for a sale, but Pogba is still here.
I’m a fan of Donny, but he’s simply nowhere close to the quality of Pogba and Bruno. He’s not getting any serious game time while those two are still at OT.
If he's not performed well enough to get any game time, that's not Ole's fault. It's kind of Ole's fault for signing a player who isn't good enough though, and kind of his fault for holding on to him indefinitely when he doesn't rate him.I just don't see how 3 games is anything to base what's going to happen for the rest of the season. He'll most likely start against Young boys, he'll probably play against West ham in the EFL - heck he may even get a go against Newcastle. If he cant make an impact in those games, that's his own fault.
He was pretty mediocre when he did come on last season, so he's got a fair bit to prove and I don't see why Ole should be playing him in the games you mention above yet. He hardly set the world alight in pre season either. If he doesn't get starts in a minimum of two of the games above, then I agree there was little point in keeping him.
Mr Van Der Beek esq. presumably.What else do I call him? Dominick? Donny is his name.
Donny van de Beek
McFred were fit to play v Leeds. The reasons given were pretty fair for Southampton (Matic having a longer and better preseason). And Traore would have eaten VdB alive on the counter on Sunday. If Pogba couldn't keep a handle on him, no way could Donny have.You must have forgot last season happened also..
The point is, if he couldn't get any game time in the first 3 matches given the circumstances, then he isn't getting a look in for the rest of the season except for League Cup games.
1. We were 5-1 up agaisnt Leeds and Matic came off the bench ahead of him.
2. Southampton - Mctominay injured, and Matic got the start ahead of him.
3. Pogba has 5 assists in 2 games from the left, so there's every reason to keep him there and that frees up more opportunities for VDB in midfield. What does Ole do against Wolves? Moves Pogba back to midfield so he doesn't have to play VDB, and plays Dan James out wide instead (who was sold 24 hours later for not being good enough). Mctominay still injured.
Why can't people just accept Ole fecked up massively in his decision to sign him, and compounding that by refusing to sell.
Actually it’s Neema to his friends. Or Uncle Matic.It's just really cringey to act all matey with the name while pretending he's a meaningful squad player when he got half the minutes of Matic and a whopping 4 starts all league season, one of which ended with him getting subbed at HT.
Sorry. I meant "half the minutes of Nemanja"
Donny featured in 36 games last season. He's a squad player who's waiting for his chance to solidify a slot in the team. I know that Caf has some sort of victim complex towards this player, but he's not been that great when he's had the chance.
Why is it Ole's fault? Real wanted him, I'm sure most of us thought he was a very talented player at Ajax, many players just can't make the step up. Feck me, indefinitely?! He's been here one season mate.If he's not performed well enough to get any game time, that's not Ole's fault. It's kind of Ole's fault for signing a player who isn't good enough though, and kind of his fault for holding on to him indefinitely when he doesn't rate him.
You're right that it's all speculation because any way it's sliced or diced, spending 35 million on a guy that gets so few chances is bizarre and naturally prompts guesswork as to why. Usually managers are fairly stubborn in giving chances to new signings, this seems to be the opposite.The poor in training theory is plausible but we won't have any confirmation soon.
Another theory is we spent 35m on a backup player. Basically like Ake for City. Plays some early cups and is bought to sooth any injury crisis paranoia by the manager. It's an oil club type signing that's motivated by situations like Liverpool last season. VDB gets to feature if Pogba and Bruno or Fred and McTominay get injured. Ake gets to play if Stones and Laporte or Mendy and Zinchenko are injured.
We're all speculating here and we shouldn't take Ole's word on everything. All good managers lie, like how Matic and VDB played well after having stinkers.
I never said McFred weren't fit for Leeds so not sure why you're mentioning that they were.McFred were fit to play v Leeds. The reasons given were pretty fair for Southampton (Matic having a longer and better preseason). And Traore would have eaten VdB alive on the counter on Sunday. If Pogba couldn't keep a handle on him, no way could Donny have.
It's just really cringey to act all matey with the name while pretending he's a meaningful squad player when he got half the minutes of Matic and a whopping 4 starts all league season, one of which ended with him getting subbed at HT.
Sorry. I meant "half the minutes of Nemanja"
You're right that it's all speculation because any way it's sliced or diced, spending 35 million on a guy that gets so few chances is bizarre and naturally prompts guesswork as to why. Usually managers are fairly stubborn in giving chances to new signings, this seems to be the opposite.
However, I can't fathom that it would be that he was always bought for this particular backup/Bruno injury role. I think if they thought he was good enough to step into the breach if our key player became a long term casualty then I find it hard to think he would get minimal appearances in other situations, such as a proper sub (not 10 mins) or rotated in. Something about that just doesn't add up.
I think the training theory is the only thing making any sense. That he has been out of his depth and he's been hard to pick and retain credibility for the manager among the squad. If a guy is the worst midfielder in training then how do you say to the others you're coming out for Donny today? It's plausible, but at the very least suggests a grave misjudgment from our recruitment team.
It isn't rocket science and had this been a transfer offer made a few days ago I would probably agree. As it is, it's a loan offer seemingly made within 3/4 hours of the window closing. It would have been fecking insanity to accept that.Ole doesn't rate him, we should have sold him to make room for a new signing, it's not rocket science.
You asked why he wasn't being played, no? I just gave you the potential reasons as to why.I never said McFred weren't fit for Leeds so not sure why you're mentioning that they were.
Basically, he's 5th choice in that double pivot even behind old man Matic and can't be trusted to play against Wolves because Ole thinks he's too shit to play against a lower half team - if this is the case then Ole has made a massive cock-up in signing him, and we should cut our losses now and bring in a replacement.
What the Ole-can-do-no-wrong fans don't seem to understand is no one really feels that strongly that VDB should be starting games as if he's earned it, they do feel strongly that Ole has spunked 40m up the wall and is holding on to a player he doesn't rate for no good reason.
I got to see him in the behind closed doors friendly vs Burnley -long story - and he played badly in that match tbf. Ole obviously doesn’t trust him from what he’s seen thus far - and that’s not going away until he puts in a performance when given the chance. He’s looked scared stiff to play his ‘natural game’ - for some players United is just too big - I remember birtles/davenport from back in the 80s suffering the same stage fright - but they won’t let him go just yet incase he does come good - long season ahead so let’s hope so….
Selfishly I'd like him to stay because there will be injuries at some point (or Solskjaer will finally show sense and drop Fred) but I understand why he wants out of here. World Cup year and he's gonna play feck all.
What a disastrous signing.