RedThaiDevils#7
Full Member
Berbatov has been immense this year, I don't understand where all the negativity comes from ? ? ?
Well, the fact that he scored against Liverpool, Inter, Tottenham, Villa, Porto, Arsenal and City in his last 19 games is where his influence came from that season, which was after this point.
That wasn't the point I was making, it was about the criteria used for some players and not others. You use the fact that Berbatov didn't score in 9 games as some form of proof that he's not top class, that it just wouldn't happen to a top class striker, and yet Ronaldo's gone and out-done that and yet you laud his importance.
Do players having great seasons, as I keep hearing he's having, go seven games without scoring?
Do they go nine games without scoring?
This implies that any player who has a great season can't go 7 games without scoring. Ronaldo went 11. Yet you called him hugely influential. You're changing the argument every time.
Firstly, Ronaldo may have gone longer without a goal that season than Berbatov has this (I didn't know this but I'll take your word for it). However you clearly fail to recognise that he played as an attacking winger for us, not a centre forward. Also, as someone previously stated, you don't have to play badly just because you don't score, likewise you can score and still play badly (don't spin this).
But lets wait until the end of the year and see if he gets the same accolades that Ronaldo won in the comparable year. Or are you another one who thinks even the voters for this award are biased against Berbatov?
/edit: Vidic is having a terrific season despite scoring only once. I judge every player on performances, not stats.
Berbatov has been immense this year, I don't understand where all the negativity comes from ? ? ?
First off, Ronaldo was never a striker - he was a winger and he was our most influential player by far, he would take the game by the neck; Cantona was never the most prolific but still the best United player I've seen play, for impassioned inspiring performances, he made the team perform.
Berbatov as a thirty year old experienced two-time CL Final player doesn't lead or take hold of the game.
A pity Ferguson obviously doesn't agree with you!
I think the awards aren't really based on calendar years but based on reputation (and every 4 years WC performances). Countless examples of that, isn't there? Ronaldo wasn't the second best player in the world in 08/09, that's ridiculous.
Most of his influence came from his goal threat, he was usually the furthest player forward, and his game was geared around that. He wasn't beating players for fun, providing a constant source of crosses or passes, he was there to get the goals and be the biggest singular threat in the team with other players adapting to help that. I'm not sure Ronaldo and Cantona's attitude are the best comparison, especially Ronaldo's attitude in his last season.
You're changing the argument again though, it wasn't about taking lead or hold of the game before, it was his goal droughts. His unbelievably poor goal droughts. That were bettered by Ronaldo. In a great season.
Something doesn't quite fit there. Try addressing that point rather than creating another.
Brwned - he was a winger who scored SIX goals his first season, ten his next, maybe twelve his next then twenty the year after and 40-odd the year after.
He was NEVER a striker, Fergie made him one - he wanted to be a winger.
I don't think anyone's attidue is comparable to the King's, but let's get it right, how many times did you see Eric throw his arms around in disgust if Ince, Keane, Giggs or Beckham never laid on a decent pass to him in the manner Berbatov did against Blackburn last season? That showing by him was absolutely disgusting....
But we're mentioning players here who could win games at the quitest of times, Eric and Ronaldo - Berbatov has NEVER took the scruff of the neck the way these lads did.
Yes, he made him into a striker. In 07/08. He's continued to be one. There's every reason to compare him and Berbatov because their primary role was to score goals. Both had other responsibilities, obviously, but then so does every player.
So, tell me, did Ronaldo not have a great season or was it just a bizarre set of criteria to slag Berbatov off? It's got to be one of the two.
I don't know about Cantona but I know Ronaldo's done that and worse.
No, you're mentioning those players. God knows why - it was about goal droughts previously.
DId Ronaldo slag his own players of or criticise their passes, involvement or contribution or was it more like the fact Ronny spat the dum-dum because he either got tackled or wasn't quick enough to reach the ball in which he's do his huff and rolleye at the ref?
He never threw his arm round at Nani or Fletcher like Berbatov did in plenty of games but a bizarre culmination of arm-throwing that game which might explain my disdain for him, because he was a proper cnut that game, make no mistake.
Just add "No Criticism Allowed" to the title of this thread
Just add "No Criticism Allowed" to the title of this thread
Just add "No Stupid Criticism Allowed" to the title of this thread
Yes, which is why I qualified it by saying that Ronaldo's performances - goals aside - weren't significantly better than Berbatov's. I think you'll find more games that Berbatov played well in and didn't score in than you can find for Ronaldo.
I think the awards aren't really based on calendar years but based on reputation (and every 4 years WC performances). Countless examples of that, isn't there? Ronaldo wasn't the second best player in the world in 08/09, that's ridiculous.
I've not said Berbatov this season is better than Ronaldo of 08/09, by the way. You're arguing that with someone else.
I watched every game that season also and vehemently disgaree with your conclusion. He was putting in 7/8 out of 10 performances every week (with the odd 5-6) and stepped it up to 9's and 10's for the games you mentioned. I think that because the season before he was putting in 8's, 9's and 10's and doing it with a bit more flair some people forget how much of a monster he was in his last season for us (even taking into account his injury which meant he missed Aug/Sept). He was as good in 08/09 as in 06/07, but did it with far less stepovers, outside of the boot balls and "criss-cross" crosses.
To say Berbatov has been better this year vs Ronaldo that year is so outlandish an opinion it could be called a lie.
It seems people rate style over substance often on the Cafe (probably why Berbatov is rated so highly by some).
Apologies, I thought you were insinuating that were were in full agreement with KE7.
I think for the season 08-09 there is an argument for Ronaldo being the second best player in the world (the criteria the Ballon d'Or used is for seasons, not calender years and he was voted 2nd). Although he would be prejudiced by the fact he missed Aug/Sept through injury and was playing his way back into form in Oct. Also Ronaldo wouldn't be favoured due to his International performances for obvious reasons.
Anyway this is a thread about Berbatov and I don't share SR's changing goalposts regarding the criteria of a good or great player, I merely watch every game and feel Berbatov is having a decent-good season this year, not great, not bad.
Not sure if people do, if you read through this thread you'll see it's full of absurd claims and downright lies, some of which can't be seen as critique of Berbatov, but attacks on honesty, truth and sanity. These are bound to draw reactions from those who are not bonkers. Case in point a few posts up: Berbatov's 10 game drought becomes 11. How on earth can someone write stuff like that, thinking it makes sense? And Johnno's claim that Berbatov hasn't had a very good season because he has had poor games, while simultaneously refusing to apply the same criteria to other players... Beggars belief.Why do people seem to take criticism of a player so personally?
You can't include games he didn't play in as games he didn't score in, that's ridiculous.
Not sure if people do, if you read through this thread you'll see it's full of absurd claims and downright lies, some of which can't be seen as critique of Berbatov, but attacks on honesty, truth and sanity. These are bound to draw reactions from those who are not bonkers. Case in point a few posts up: Berbatov's 10 game drought becomes 11. How on earth can someone write stuff like that, thinking it makes sense? And Johnno's claim that Berbatov hasn't had a very good season because he has had poor games, while simultaneously refusing to apply the same criteria to other players... Beggars belief.
Ronaldos goal drought was the same as Berba 11 games.
15/11/08 till 20/01/09
11 games
started 10 subbed once
2 UCL
1 CC
8 EPL
Berbatov drought
26/09/2010 till 27/11/2010
11 games
4 UCL
7 EPL
started 9 - subbed 1 and not used 1
What's ridiculous is you trying to frig the stats. He was on the teamsheet as a sub in a home UCL game against Bursapor. The fact he didnt play was as much to do with his impact as a sub.
Oh dear, what a pathetic post. Some of the posters here will stoop down to any level to prove their agenda.
Not sure if people do, if you read through this thread you'll see it's full of absurd claims and downright lies, some of which can't be seen as critique of Berbatov, but attacks on honesty, truth and sanity. These are bound to draw reactions from those who are not bonkers. Case in point a few posts up: Berbatov's 10 game drought becomes 11. How on earth can someone write stuff like that, thinking it makes sense? And Johnno's claim that Berbatov hasn't had a very good season because he has had poor games, while simultaneously refusing to apply the same criteria to other players... Beggars belief.
Including games he didn't play in.
I reckon we should get rid of Kuszczak, it's been 12 games since he kept a clean sheet.
If the agenda is dealing with facts.