DannyDee
Full Member
Paying this type of money for a player from the Dutch League seems quite risky right now. Very few in recent years have been able to cope with the step up, especially when done in the middle of their development.
Spurs need to start off his signing video with Danny Rose googling him.
Spurs need to start off his signing video with Danny Rose googling him.
Spurs finally loosen the purse strings! In this market 40 mill is almost the going rate for a young player with high potential.
Yeah it's great to see and gives me hope that we can make that next step.
I confused his age with De Ligt then I think. Still that's very young for a defender, he has 7-8 years go before his peak and plenty of time to win a place in first team. Being rotated with Alderweireld and Verthonghen is not the end of the world either.He's 21.
Had to Google him. He can't be elite...
He looks light years ahead of Lindelof (albeit early days), Smalling and blind. I don't often think wow, 'he looks some player' but I did with him and at such a young age.
You're basing that on Sanchez in the EL final and Lindelof in pre-season. None of us really have any idea how Lindelof will turn out. Give him a chance.
Sanchez has all the physical attributes and he does look monstrous, but if we bought him, he would be the poorest of all out centre backs with the ball at his feet, Smalling included. At Ajax, De Ligt was the far more accomplished centre back, whilst being 4 years younger. If there's anyone we should go for, it is him. What Sanchez brings, I think we already have covered with Bailly, Smalling and arguably Jones as well. I personally see Bailly as the better prospect.
Sanchez was Ajax player of the season and Ruud Gullit called him the best Ajax defender since Jaap Stam (i.e - better than Vertonghen or Alderweireld). There's no situation where De Ligt was the more accomplished player of the two. Not to say De Ligt isn't a monster prospect (he is), but Sanchez was the rock that team was built on last year.
Spurs need to start off his signing video with Danny Rose googling him.
Doesn't answer the question really. If they are playing 2 at the back he still needs to play better than both Verthongen and Alderweireld which is doubtful.Sanchez is 18. He has plenty of time to break through and will have plenty of games to feature in considering Spurs are likely to play more than 50 this season.
Why does he have to play better than both? If he is second best center half at the club (so better than just one of them), he will start on a regular basis. If he is third best defender there, he still gets to play a lot.Doesn't answer the question really. If they are playing 2 at the back he still needs to play better than both Verthongen and Alderweireld which is doubtful.
Doesn't answer the question really. If they are playing 2 at the back he still needs to play better than both Verthongen and Alderweireld which is doubtful.
He doesn't get to play a lot as a third defender. He'll hardly start any league or CL games with 2 at the back.Why does he have to play better than both? If he is second best center half at the club (so better than just one of them), he will start on a regular basis. If he is third best defender there, he still gets to play a lot.
Makes sense considering the transfers but why change a formula that works?We will play 3 at the back.
He doesn't get to play a lot as a third defender. He'll hardly start any league or CL games with 2 at the back.
Makes sense considering the transfers but why change a formula that works?
Do Spurs really need more potential though?
Surely an investment or two in serious quality is what elevates them a level.
Looked a beast against us in the EL final although very raw. Like Smalling and Jones rolled into one.
The thing i remember most is how Pogba just pushed him off a ball without even trying. It was like a man against a boy.
You played it a lot less than 4-2-3-1 is what I'm saying. What does some time mean? Pre-season?We played 3 at the back a lot last season, it's the way we will play from now on and has been our preferred tactic for some time.
You played it a lot less than 4-2-3-1 is what I'm saying. What does some time mean? Pre-season?
He doesn't get to play a lot as a third defender. He'll hardly start any league or CL games with 2 at the back.
Makes sense considering the transfers but why change a formula that works?