David Moyes - The Tactician

Anyway, I think Moyes is trying something different to help Kagawa find his best form for us, when he starts games on the left. I noticed Kagawa and Rooney interchanging in the first half, and in the second half, the same occurred, but Kagawa also drifted infield. In the first image above, Kagawa drifts in centrally and identifies the space behind Arteta (second image shows Arteta's poor positioning). In the third image, Flamini is drawn out to close Kagawa, who heads the ball onto Van Persie (thanks Vermaelen). Ball falls to Rooney and he misses - but the "confusion" Kagawa caused is what starts the move. If we can get more of this interchange, we'll see the better side, though to be fair, he has been in good form this season. He's just not been brilliant.

I am still ambivalent in this. Yes, Kagawa was a better support for Rooney in the box, but it still makes up narrow on the top. On many occasions, you can see us waiting for Evra to get the cross in. I'd rather we had a Young type player who can provide the width and stretch their defence.

Moyes tactics were a bit strange too. He absolutely refuses to trust Fabio and Zaha.
1) For Arsenal match, I'd rather had Fabio coming on for Vidic moving Smalling to CB and retaining Jones in the middle.
2) Anyone but Giggs coming on on that crucial stages. Giggs absolutely had no effect on the flying Sangna and we were only saved by the incompetence of Giroud and Bendtner. If RvP was still playing for Arsenal, he would have buried both crosses in our net.

I don;t know how he got the players to improve, but the off ball pressurising by Rooney, Valencia & Kagawa made a considerable difference. They just did not give time or space for them to play their passing game. Hover about the box, but just could not get near in the first half.
 
I am still ambivalent in this. Yes, Kagawa was a better support for Rooney in the box, but it still makes up narrow on the top. On many occasions, you can see us waiting for Evra to get the cross in. I'd rather we had a Young type player who can provide the width and stretch their defence.

Moyes tactics were a bit strange too. He absolutely refuses to trust Fabio and Zaha.
1) For Arsenal match, I'd rather had Fabio coming on for Vidic moving Smalling to CB and retaining Jones in the middle.
2) Anyone but Giggs coming on on that crucial stages. Giggs absolutely had no effect on the flying Sangna and we were only saved by the incompetence of Giroud and Bendtner. If RvP was still playing for Arsenal, he would have buried both crosses in our net.

I don;t know how he got the players to improve, but the off ball pressurising by Rooney, Valencia & Kagawa made a considerable difference. They just did not give time or space for them to play their passing game. Hover about the box, but just could not get near in the first half.


Personally I think the biggest advantage of playing Rooney as a lone-striker would be that Rooney has it in him to be possibly the best striker at high-pressing in the world. He has the ability to inspire the rest of the team, great tackling, work-rate and also has the ability to find team-mates with a great pass if he gets the ball.

Especially for big European matches it would be a nightmare to face us with a high-pressing system with Rooney on top and Nani and Valencia/Welbeck there and more so if we combine it with 2 mobile midfielders. I am really excited to see what Moyes replies to Carrick being injured.
 
Personally I think the biggest advantage of playing Rooney as a lone-striker would be that Rooney has it in him to be possibly the best striker at high-pressing in the world. He has the ability to inspire the rest of the team, great tackling, work-rate and also has the ability to find team-mates with a great pass if he gets the ball.

Especially for big European matches it would be a nightmare to face us with a high-pressing system with Rooney on top and Nani and Valencia/Welbeck there and more so if we combine it with 2 mobile midfielders. I am really excited to see what Moyes replies to Carrick being injured.


I don't like seeing Rooney as a lone striker especially in the big European matches. His willingness to help out the team gets the better of him and he will always come back deep to win the ball or help the midfield when we don't have possession thus nullifying the point of a lone striker.

Its going to be interesting to see how Moyes sets up with Carrick being out now. I hope he continues to play a high pressing game as we have the players to do it effectively. We miss Welbeck on the left, he is great at drifting inside but can also keep natural width to help out Evra. I hope we see Kagawa move infield to a central midfield position playing just infront of Fellani or Cleverly. Kagawa looks best when he drifts inside so why not play him there all the time?

---------------Fellaini/Clevs-----------------
Valencia--------------Kagawa---------------
-------------Rooney---------------Welbeck/Adnan
------------------RVP------------------------
 
I am still ambivalent in this. Yes, Kagawa was a better support for Rooney in the box, but it still makes up narrow on the top. On many occasions, you can see us waiting for Evra to get the cross in. I'd rather we had a Young type player who can provide the width and stretch their defence.

Moyes tactics were a bit strange too. He absolutely refuses to trust Fabio and Zaha.
1) For Arsenal match, I'd rather had Fabio coming on for Vidic moving Smalling to CB and retaining Jones in the middle.
2) Anyone but Giggs coming on on that crucial stages. Giggs absolutely had no effect on the flying Sangna and we were only saved by the incompetence of Giroud and Bendtner. If RvP was still playing for Arsenal, he would have buried both crosses in our net.

I don;t know how he got the players to improve, but the off ball pressurising by Rooney, Valencia & Kagawa made a considerable difference. They just did not give time or space for them to play their passing game. Hover about the box, but just could not get near in the first half.

With Kagawa, we can afford to have him and Rooney interchange. I think it's the right way to go. What's important to note is that they barely interchange anyway, it's not a common occurrence within a game, but when it does happen, or when Kagawa moves centrally, behind Van Persie and Rooney, he does have a positive influence on our play. Re Young, his time is almost up I feel. It's funny because had he not dived against Real Sociedad, he would have been very useful in neutralising Arsenal's threat down the right.
 
Don't want to make a new thread because I'll either get hounded or it'll get turned into a joke, so I thought I'd ask here.

If you were given the job, what would be your plan of action to transform United from what it is now to a European powerhouse the likes of Bayern and Barca? Both tactically and on paper.
 
Don't want to make a new thread because I'll either get hounded or it'll get turned into a joke, so I thought I'd ask here.

If you were given the job, what would be your plan of action to transform United from what it is now to a European powerhouse the likes of Bayern and Barca? Both tactically and on paper.


Sack Phelan and hire the guy who got a management job after playing FM.
 
That was hilarious. This is why I love the caf, makes me laugh so much.


Not sure if serious. To be clear, a guy really was given a league management job after sending his FM resume in.

On a serious note, we can't really answer that question. We can't say we would sign "XX" because who the hell knows if they will come or not? Who knows if Rene really wanted to stay? It's easy to say I'd do "X,Y,Z", but the reality is we don't even know if that course of action is possible.
 
Don't want to make a new thread because I'll either get hounded or it'll get turned into a joke, so I thought I'd ask here.

If you were given the job, what would be your plan of action to transform United from what it is now to a European powerhouse the likes of Bayern and Barca? Both tactically and on paper.
Get us to play a high intensity game with shitloads of pressing and buy some technical quality in midfield (central and wide). Don't know if it will work or not, but I'd surely be entertained.
 
There where many lessons to learn from yesterday's excellent display. First credit to Moyes for getting both the formation and the tactic spot on. Finally we saw the real United. A well balanced team who played composed, fluid and with counter attacks. It was a pleasure to see us and a lot of players showed their real potential when they where playing in their best position.

I think it's clear for everyone that in a 2 man midfield we play our best games with one defensive energy player (Jones/Carrick) and one creative (Giggs/?) mf. Yesterday both where magnificent and they complimented each other perfect.
 
There where many lessons to learn from yesterday's excellent display. First credit to Moyes for getting both the formation and the tactic spot on. Finally we saw the real United. A well balanced team who played composed, fluid and with counter attacks. It was a pleasure to see us and a lot of players showed their real potential when they where playing in their best position.

I think it's clear for everyone that in a 2 man midfield we play our best games with one defensive energy player (Jones/Carrick) and one creative (Giggs/?) mf. Yesterday both where magnificent and they complimented each other perfect.

I'm not sure I would describe Carrick as a 'defensive energy player'. He's more than defensive. His forward passes are invaluable and he is penetrative and had a good passing range in his own right which is something Cleverley and Fellaini lack atm unfortunately. I think Carrick plays best with Jones/Cleverley as they're the energy/movement players which compliment Carricks more relaxed style.

This is the second time that a midfield of Jones and Giggs has looked good though. Giggs and Scholes are rare breeds but if anything, for me, last night Giggs highlighted the qualities we need in whichever CM we look to bring in. We have been missing that quick, slick passing through midfield.
 
Without wanting to be critical of a really good performance, we put in 24 crosses yesterday and just 3 were accurate. Valencia alone attempted 11 with 0 being accurate. Something has to give with this crossing thing. It's our main tactic, but we don't seem to be that good at it. I don't know whether the type of cross doesn't suit our strikers, we seem to do better with them when they're drilled low crosses or cut-backs as opposed to early high crosses which seem to be easily cleared by opposition defenders all the time.

Anyway don't want to detract from what was a good performance. Our passing through the middle (mainly via Giggs and Kagawa) was my personal highlight and is something I think we've missed of late with most of our attacking done down the flanks.
 
Without wanting to be critical of a really good performance, we put in 24 crosses yesterday and just 3 were accurate. Valencia alone attempted 11 with 0 being accurate. Something has to give with this crossing thing. It's our main tactic, but we don't seem to be that good at it. I don't know whether the type of cross doesn't suit our strikers, we seem to do better with them when they're drilled low crosses or cut-backs as opposed to early high crosses which seem to be easily cleared by opposition defenders all the time.

Anyway don't want to detract from what was a good performance. Our passing through the middle (mainly via Giggs and Kagawa) was my personal highlight and is something I think we've missed of late with most of our attacking done down the flanks.


Crossing is a fairly low percentage game, you have to remember. Although the stats are quite bad, not just in this game but all season. The problem stems from Valencia who can't hit a barn door with his crosses at the moment. Then as you say, the early crosses from full-backs never get anywhere either. Which is a problem with the players I think, Evra and Smalling aren't particularly good at crossing.
 
Crossing accuracy is a rubbish stat anyway. A player could put in a brilliantly placed cross by the far post but if nobody gets into the good position it means nothing.


Yup, and raining in crosses will put the opponents under peassure aswell. Keep crossing and you'll get a goal or two!
 
Crossing accuracy is a rubbish stat anyway. A player could put in a brilliantly placed cross by the far post but if nobody gets into the good position it means nothing.


Has Valencia had a very poor return from his crosses this season and the one before? Yes. Does the statistics support this claim? Yes.

Has our team in general also been over-enthusiastic about crosses this season? Yes. Does the stats support this claim? Yes.

Are Valencias stats then bad because every player in our team makes crosses with just a small chance to hit the target - or is he in fact having comparatively little success even compared to our team? The stats suggests that even with the highest number of attempted crosses by a large margin - he has a worse average "accurate crosses" than Evra/Buttner/Fabio/Nani/Rooney.

Stats are never rubbish, but they are what they are. Alone they don't mean anything but put them in to context of a game and they are the best tool for an unbiased discussion except for quotes from other players and managers(preferably not from the same team.)
 
Without wanting to be critical of a really good performance, we put in 24 crosses yesterday and just 3 were accurate. Valencia alone attempted 11 with 0 being accurate. Something has to give with this crossing thing. It's our main tactic, but we don't seem to be that good at it. I don't know whether the type of cross doesn't suit our strikers, we seem to do better with them when they're drilled low crosses or cut-backs as opposed to early high crosses which seem to be easily cleared by opposition defenders all the time.

Anyway don't want to detract from what was a good performance. Our passing through the middle (mainly via Giggs and Kagawa) was my personal highlight and is something I think we've missed of late with most of our attacking done down the flanks.

Go check out how many of our last 3 seasons goals came from crosses and get back to us.....
 
His substitutions were good, gave playing time to fringe players, gave playing time to players who needed it (Kagawa, Nani) and rested important players (Rooney, Evra).
 
Go check out how many of our last 3 seasons goals came from crosses and get back to us.....

Why? Do they make this seasons crosses more accurate? The point I'm making is that we are using crosses as a primary tactic, I think we have played the most crosses per game in the league this season yet they're largely dealt with fairly easily by the opposition defenders - and I'm not saying they don't all result in goals, because obviously they won't, but most of them don't ever find a teammate. Last season crossing wasn't our main tactic and it was more varied. Crosses served us well last season in the wins against City and Chelsea away last season for example, so I'm not saying they're useless, just that perhaps the type of early crosses we whip in doesn't suit the strikers atm.
 
I don't understand playing crosses when we have a hardworking Rooney up front, and he's not actually good at heading. Probably when you flood the midfield with 3 attackers he might get a goal or two with good positioning.

But at the moment when RvP is not around, he's doing all the bloody donkey work, and expected to be there to head the cross. No wonder we're so toothless.

Tactician? More like clueless to me.

He fails to see that we don't have the personel to play wing crosses, even RvP was not known for his aerial prowess.
 
Subs only good if we're winning kouroux.

Anyone can make a subs and lose.

Losing the game doesn't necessarily mean the substitutions were wrong/bad though.
 
I just wish he would change it up abit. Its obvious are problems are in the middle so why not put 3 there instead of 2? Its obvious our wingers are crap so why not play a more compact system relying on quick short passing where people like rvp, cleverley, kagawa, welbeck and nani excel.
 
We have Rooney, Adnan, Kagawa, Nani and strikers as RvP, even Chicha. So much talent with the ball on the feel, yet we are topping stoke in crosses (and mostly bad ones at that). That has to come a point when Moyes is responsible for baffling tactics. Fergie did incredibly with the squad he had (especially with our midfield), but we had a style of play, valued possession and got results. Moyes can't take 110% from the players like his predecessor. Our wing play is awful. Valencia is strong and useful, but it's not being worth it. Welbeck as a winger? And when you actually have proper wingers?

I'm not saying he's substandard and should be sacked, we do not operate this way like Chelsea or the other teams we abhor, but it's getting ridiculous how bad and negative we are playing. Our position in the board reflects exactly our level of play. Where is our passing game? Long balls and awful crossing, with the amount of talent we got is such a bad joke. Rotating our defense non stop, is hurting us too.

January can't come soon enough. For those who think we don't need to spend, investment in the team is really making difference in the league. Especially for Moyes new era, he's no SAF. This is not a kneejerk reaction, it's clearly a transitory period and we should have patience, but you have to at least show signs of improvements at this level. We get excited with a Leverkusen game, then we have the last two games to bring us back to reality. At least Fellaini did very well yesterday.

We are Manchester United. Let's play like it.
 
I'm amazed Rooney and RVP have scored the amount of goals they have. Our tactic of spraying it wide means they are feeding off scraps or set pieces most of the time.
 
So, have people still accepted that Moyes favprite system is hoof the ball? 'Everton played some nice football' said people here a few months ago. The only time in these last 10 years or so that Everton has played some nice football is this season.
 



Just thought I'd share some of my opinions of our play this season. I just got promoted. I hope you like it. Suggestions are welcome. I'm trying to learn more about the game. Thanks guys.

Analysis of Manchester United’s Possession & Counterattacking Play Part 1


attackattack_design.jpg
For the majority of Sir Alex's reign at Manchester United, attacking football was the overriding style of football which kept the United faithful begging for more. Over the last few years, Fergie's United has become more functional,effective and pragmatic. As Moyes looks to prove himself as United manager, let's take a look at some of the areas that will need tweaking if Manchester United are going to return to more fluid,attacking football. Part 1 focuses on United's match against Tottenham at White Hart Lane. Part 2 will focus on United's match against Everton.


United's Possession Play:
(Possession out of the back)
As you can see in the two photos above, United struggled to offer good passing options to the player on the ball (Evans) in reaction to Spurs' high pressure early on. Cleverley should be checking back towards Evans while Jones should orient his positioning to form a passing triangle with Evans, Cleverley and another with Smalling and Valencia. Evans is forced to punt the ball out of play as a result. Spurs set out to use this early domination and pressure in high areas to establish control of the midfield.​
Jones has the option to pass to Kagawa (red) or Cleverley. Since Jones isn't really a great passer of the ball, he elects to pass to Cleverley instead (black line). Passing to Cleverley makes it easier for Spurs to contain United's play because the buildup is in front of them and they don't have to worry about adjusting to a situation where United's attackers are pulling them out of position. A pass to Kagawa in this situation draws immediate attention from Spurs CMs and backline because he is positioned in between their midfield and defense. It also gives Rooney space to make a run in behind as the opposition would be focused on cutting out Kagawa's threat.​
Cleverley has Jones and Rooney as passing options. Although the pass to Rooney would be a more difficult pass, it shows the mentality of United's midfielders who didn't attempt many forward passes through midfield.​
Also if Rooney does receive the ball in this situation, Kagawa and Welbeck are not in a position to support him as Chiriches is following Rooney's run making both Kagawa and Welbeck offside. The X's denote where Kagawa and Welbeck should be and what options they could present at that position. For example, Rooney gets the ball and decides to pass to Welbeck. Welbeck then either can play a 1-2 with Rooney or try to open up for a shot on goal.​
The black line indicates the action Cleverley actually took as he passes the ball to Jones and the attack is funneled wide.​
Cleverley feels pressure from Soldado and has a split second to make a decision. Rooney drops to provide a passing outlet for Cleverley but the United midfielder instead chose to dribble and pass the ball wide to Smalling. Play was then recycled to the other flank as United attempted to probe Tottenham's defense on the flanks. If Rooney did receive the pass from Cleverley, he would have 3 options (denoted by yellow lines):​
1. Take on Dawson and attempt a shot on goal
2. Pass to Welbeck for a potential give-and-go situation
3. Pass to Kagawa and then make a run in behind Spurs' backline​
(United Counterattacking with Cleverley)
In the first picture above, Cleverley is dribbling towards the left flank with 3 passing options in Evra, Jones and Kagawa. Surprisingly, he takes an extra touch before attempting to pass to Kagawa and allows Walker to intercept the ball even though he already has passing options around him. This kind of hesitancy on the ball is not isolated to Cleverley.​
It also occurs with Jones, Fellaini and sometimes Carrick. The tempo in the EPL is quite frenetic so players have to make split-second decisions. However, being able to spot the pass and play it quickly is an area where United's midfield needs improvement. It's in these split-second decisions which can decide whether there's an opening in the opponent's defense.​
The second picture shows Spurs on the break after the interception of Cleverley's pass.​
 

This situation highlights the concept of players seeing the pass but not having the confidence to execute it (in this case Vidic).
Welbeck is in a decent position to receive the ball. In the sequence of play, he is actually jogging backwards so for this situation to work he would need to remain stationary (where he is now). If he does receive the ball from Vidic, he has a few options available to him:​
1. Lay ball off to Cleverley who can either lay off the ball to Rooney, Kagawa out wide or play the return ball to Welbeck.
2.Try to beat Chiriches on the dribble (who will be drawn to Welbeck when he receives the ball)
3. Play pass to Jones and create wide overload with Valencia​
Vidic instead plays a long ball to Valencia and United's attack eventually peters out.​
In this situation Rooney is passing back to Vidic as he is under pressure. Although United have maintained possession, with play being recycled through Vidic, Spurs have more time to reorganize their defensive shape. The Paulinho, Sandro, Dembele trio made it difficult for United to have any joy in midfield. United then reacted by attacking via the flanks (mainly down Valencia's side). In order to play through midfield, United needed to play quick passing interchanges.​
The above picture shows a possible scenario of how to accomplish this. Instead of passing back to Vidic, Rooney would pass to Cleverley (red line) who would either pass to Jones or fill the gap left by Sandro and dribble towards Spurs' backline. If the ball goes to Jones, Jones knows he can't take on Spurs' backline by himself so he would pass back to Cleverley who would pass to Kagawa on the flank. In this picture, Evra starts his run from midfield. If he continues along the yellow line (with Kagawa on the ball), Walker will be forced to track his run which gives Kagawa the option of attempting to play him in behind or attacking the space left by Walker.​
This above picture is another great example of our CMs' focus on creating via the wide areas. The black line indicates the pass Jones made in this situation. The red "X" indicates that this pass was intercepted. Welbeck checks his run towards Jones which gives Jones another passing option (red line). Let's say Jones decides to pass to Welbeck. Welbeck would then have a few options to choose from:​
1. Play a first-time pass to Rooney
2. Turn, dribble and attempt a shot on goal
3.Lay the ball off to Cleverley​
Based on the picture, option 1 looks the best as at this point in time, Spurs CBs are not tight on Rooney. This would give Rooney about an extra second to adjust his position and open up his body for Welbeck's first-time pass. Jones' pass to Welbeck would need to be firm otherwise, Dawson & Chiriches would have enough time to recover the situation.​
Here, Jones has received the pass from Hernandez and is going to pass to Smalling to switch the play (black line). This is another area where United need to improve because while switching play is useful, if it becomes your default option, then other avenues of attack will not be used.​
Notice how Spurs' CMs are all focused on Jones. If Jones played a first-time pass to Cleverley instead of opening his body up to pass to Smalling, Spurs would be caught out. Hernandez's tendency is to play the ball and then sprint into the box. While this is happening, Rooney would drop slightly closer to Cleverley's position (who now has the ball in this hypothetical situation), collect the ball from Cleverley, turn and either attempt to play Hernandez through, wait for Cleverley's support run or attempt a shot on goal.​
Young takes up an okay position between Sandro and Townsend. Ideally, he would be further away from Townsend and a bit higher(closer to Spurs' backline) than where he is now. Nonetheless, Cleverley has an alternate passing option in Rooney but since it's a more difficult pass, chooses to pass to Evra on the flanks. This was an opportunity late in the game to deviate from the game plan and try and ask a different question of the Spurs' defense. Rooney is in a good position to either play Hernandez through, lay off the ball to Young who would be making a run towards goal, or take a shot on himself.​
When United don't get time and space in central zones, possession is circulated in wide areas in hope that the fullbacks or wingers can penetrate the opposition. By not being more adventurous through the middle, United's pattern of play therefore becomes predictable and makes it easier for the opponent to cut out crosses or balls into the box. This is what occurred against Spurs and even though Valencia threatened multiple times throughout the game, his end product was not up to par which provided the other attacking players with very little service.
David Moyes can choose to continue with the same tactics but it's paramount that United find a reliable shuttler willing to join the attack and probe the opposition through central areas. Being able to attack through the center, does provide options to be more penetrative down the flanks. As will be shown in part 2, Giggs' adventurous play can solve part of this issue.

Thanks for reading!
 
Good article from The Guardian on how we've changed
http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2013/dec/08/david-moyes-fourth-place-manchester-united

Tried to highlight the main points.

- average goals per game down from 2.26 last season to 1.43 this.
- possession, cross completion, duels won, shots on target all down from last season
- higher % of goals from set-pieces this
- giving up more shots in dangerous areas
- creating chances in less dangerous areas
- fewer successful passes in the opponents final third
- playing more down the flanks and less through the centre, relying on crosses
- fewer runs made into the box
- blocking fewer shots in our own area
- allowing our opponents more shooting chances
- spent more time behind chasing games.
 
I find it surprising that we are even more crossing reliant than last season. At times we looked completely lost last season when the wingers had an off-day, and now we are more reliant on width than that.

Sadly stats like the above highlight how Moyes fails to try and play modern football, and instead relies on the old and unsophisticated get it wide and then into the box strategy.
 
@Gladiator: I'm a fan. Keep up the good work. Even without Dortmund/Barca/Bayern type of off the ball movement, we still have ways of playing simple and better football than what we have. It is frustrating to see players who opt for the safest option time and time again, recycling the play, allowing the opponent to get back into shape. We lack players who play with cojones.
 
Just thought I'd share some of my opinions of our play this season. I just got promoted. I hope you like it. Suggestions are welcome. I'm trying to learn more about the game. Thanks guys.

Jones has the option to pass to Kagawa (red) or Cleverley. The black line indicates the action Cleverley actually took as he passes the ball to Jones and the attack is funneled wide.​
Cleverley feels pressure from Soldado and has a split second to make a decision. Rooney drops to provide a passing outlet for Cleverley but the United midfielder instead chose to dribble and pass the ball wide to Smalling. Play was then recycled to the other flank as United attempted to probe Tottenham's defense on the flanks. If Rooney did receive the pass from Cleverley, he would have 3 options (denoted by yellow lines):​
1. Take on Dawson and attempt a shot on goal​
2. Pass to Welbeck for a potential give-and-go situation​
3. Pass to Kagawa and then make a run in behind Spurs' backline​

Welcome up. Good effort on the post.

Some comments:

1st picture: Kagawa is surrpounded by 4 players. Even if the gets the ball without being tackeled by the nearest defender, Rooney and Wellbeck (assuming he is far out onw) already have markers. Cleverly is in the middle and a much better option to redistribute the play.

2nd picture: This I agree with. Cleverly should have hobbed it off wide for Wellbeck to run and try a shot from the flanks. The comment about him not trying to take a shot at goal is also too true. Since Scholes (and recently Jones) none of our players even consider taking a shot from edge of the box. Absolutely no threat from midfielders.

The 2nd picture also shows my personal biggest frustration with Wellbeck, Nani & Kagawa. They tend to cut in and hover around the box making it difficult to pass to them. We do not have any creative midfielders that can make accurate passes for them to score. They need to be further out wide faciliating easier options to receive the ball and easier to tun in, try a chip or a cross across the face of the goal for Kagawa and maybe a running Cleverly to slot in. Though absent in this picture, this is the crucial service Evra provides.

And I would say this reflects on our lack of wide players for 4-4-2 and Cleverly unfinished talent, rather than anything on Moyes!
 
IMHO

In a high level football, the tactics and instructions given plays a huge part in determining the performance of the game. I'm not tactical expert, but it's logic to assume that:

When the most important part of the team (i.e. Midfield) has problems, the whole teams suffers.

1. Nani wouldn't have the room to maneuver if there's no movement in the middle
2. Kagawa can't drift inside if there's no understanding with the winger
3. A midfield who can't pass well can't pass to a penetrating teammates, hence most of our midfields are passing it sideways or backpass
4. Our striker can't properly function knowing that there won't be any through ball coming, or movement that allows them to occupy the center back hoping for some penetratioin from the midfield.
5. The opponent CB's job will be easier knowing that there's only a possibility of shit crosses coming, and it's much easier to defend when you know 99% what we're going to do with it, what makes a CB job hard is to expect many things at once, trickery, pace, movement of the ball, this is why we're so clueless against barca, we do not know what to expect, who to mark, where the next guy will be coming from.
6. Rio / Evans can't function properly if the midfield can't find spaces and even if they managed to get it to them they'll probably pass it meaninglessly back or sideways.
7. With Smailing as RB, you can't pass to him because he can't fecking keep the ball if necessary, he can't fecking pass it because he's not taught to pass like a full back, so that takes out an option of passing to him

In a nutshell, the opponent knows our number, any half decent team can handle shit crosses, specially when there's only 1 striker there who's probably have to drop deep to get the midfield going, and can't be there to receive the cross, and even if RvP/Rooney makes the run, there's no guarantee they'll win the header, even if they won the header, they'll probably be so far away from the goals due to us playing so deep and lack of penetrating runs. I guess that figures why we score so little from open play.
 
Welcome up. Good effort on the post.

Some comments:

1st picture: Kagawa is surrpounded by 4 players. Even if the gets the ball without being tackeled by the nearest defender, Rooney and Wellbeck (assuming he is far out onw) already have markers. Cleverly is in the middle and a much better option to redistribute the play.

2nd picture: This I agree with. Cleverly should have hobbed it off wide for Wellbeck to run and try a shot from the flanks. The comment about him not trying to take a shot at goal is also too true. Since Scholes (and recently Jones) none of our players even consider taking a shot from edge of the box. Absolutely no threat from midfielders.

The 2nd picture also shows my personal biggest frustration with Wellbeck, Nani & Kagawa. They tend to cut in and hover around the box making it difficult to pass to them. We do not have any creative midfielders that can make accurate passes for them to score. They need to be further out wide faciliating easier options to receive the ball and easier to tun in, try a chip or a cross across the face of the goal for Kagawa and maybe a running Cleverly to slot in. Though absent in this picture, this is the crucial service Evra provides.

And I would say this reflects on our lack of wide players for 4-4-2 and Cleverly unfinished talent, rather than anything on Moyes!

Thanks for your response. On the 1st picture, you make a good point. What I was trying to highlight is how kagawa likes to play and where he likes to receive the ball. It would have been a very tight pass, but then these are the type of passes Giggs would not be afraid to pass and these passes can make all the difference in pulling a defense apart.

You should think about making your own posts like I did. You have good picture of the game.