We are never going to reach their level of we keep selling our best players to them.
Our player has just led them to 3 CL titles in 4 years.
Do not accept any bid under any circumstance.
He'll get over it.Of course we shouldn't sell BUT if you are De Get sitting at home watching this tonight then honestly what are you thinking.
This. If we sell them we'll show we don't have an ambition to come to the top again.We are never going to reach their level of we keep selling our best players to them.
Our player has just led them to 3 CL titles in 4 years.
Do not accept any bid under any circumstance.
There's a danger for David that if he joins it'll be at the tailend of a legendary period. He's joining after the side has peaked.Of course we shouldn't sell BUT if you are De Get sitting at home watching this tonight then honestly what are you thinking.
One can argue De Gea and Ronaldo sre the only players Real have felt are a good enough quality for them.You're wrong, DDG if he wants to go should be allowed to imo, we just need to make it work in a favour this time, Ronaldo was a similar case to DDG, we have just been unfortunate with the nationality of these two players, beyond that we haven't sold them anyone we didn't want to.
There's a danger for David that if he joins it'll be at the tailend of a legendary period. He's joining after the side has peaked.
He has nothing to lose if he waits it out to see how we build and how Madrid transition from Ronaldo / Modric etc
There's a danger for David that if he joins it'll be at the tailend of a legendary period. He's joining after the side has peaked.
One can argue De Gea and Ronaldo sre the only players Real have felt are a good enough quality for them.
My point still stands. We are a big club. And when we sign a player, that player has to come with the expectation that he will spend the best part of his career here.
I go back to the Bayern example.
Are you telling me Lewandowski wouldn't be interested in Real.
He knows Bayern wouldn't sell him under any circumstances.
If we don't stop it now ,it will never stop.
If De Gea informs the club he wants to leave, they should honour that and negotiate with Madrid.
How do we do that?It's different though, DDG is Spanish, and his home in Madrid, he could have just run the final 12 months of his contract down when the deal fell through 2 years ago, but he signed up so we could protect out asset, and his level hasn't dropped once, if we were talking about Bailly right now then I'd agree with you, tell them to do one, but we're not.
I think now if he does want out, and we can make the deal work for us we should allow him to go, after all it could be better for us to take slight drop in the keeper department if it means we get ourselves a top forward player (assuming we tie one into the deal), as they seem few and far between this summer, and our need is great there.
If De Gea informs the club he wants to leave, they should honour that and negotiate with Madrid.
As it stands though, he hasn't angled for a move and so Woodward and Co need to tell Madrid to stick it. They don't get to poach our best players. No matter the fee.
Why? Our only concern should be having the best team possible - read a quote this week by Martin Keown saying Arsenal should sell Sanchez and Ozil if they aren't committed etc...cliched nonsense IMO - saying "we only want players who are desperate to be here" plays well with fans but ultimately, you lose by selling them - if you have to fight for them then then that's what you should do. De Gea signed a deal, he can be forced to stay unless he refuses to play etc, then as a last resort you'd be forced to but we hold the cards in this deal.
Why should the club honor anything? If anything, he has to honor the contract with us or make sure his dream club pays enough for us to let him out of his obligation.
How do we do that?
Where can we find an equally good keeper.?
All the reports have said he's happy to stay.
And will only move if we get a deal we are happy with.
My final thoughts are that we shouldn't be happy with any deal.
Even if Real bid £100m, we should reject it.
We can't replace him so it's no use to us.
And a player going home should be none of our business. That's not a reason to sell him.
If Pogbas not the best midfielder in the Premier, then who is?Pogba is a fair way from even being the best midfielder in the Prem, let alone the world. The price you were suckered into paying for him is irrelevant.
Except with DeGea, they would be set in the Gk dept. for the next 10 years. Which puts into perspective the 60m+ outlay. Plus, who said they wouldn't spend on an upgrade on Benzema if they went for DeGea. They could easily go for two top class players.Real have no great reason to go for him, other than Galactico policy and him being Spanish NT #1. Obviously De Gea is better than Navas but from their perspective, they really don't need to spend 60m+ GBP on a GK. They're already La Liga champions and now back to back CL champions. They're better off spending big money on upgrading on Benzema or another top class CB alongside Ramos.
If Pogbas not the best midfielder in the Premier, then who is?
And before you say Kante, Pogba's stats are considerably better this season. When Pogba doesn't score, it makes the headlines but Kante gets applauded for it. It makes no sense.
But it'd be a purely human decision. He's held his counsel in recent months and if he wishes to return to his home city (with his partner), the least United can do is look to facilitate that by negotiating with Madrid - despite how little appetite Woodward and Co have for selling to Real.
He's a human being. Not an asset. All you'd be doing is keeping an unhappy, resentful player. And that situation isn't healthy.
If he asks to leave, the club will in all probably, negotiate his departure.
Why? Our only concern should be having the best team possible - read a quote this week by Martin Keown saying Arsenal should sell Sanchez and Ozil if they aren't committed etc...cliched nonsense IMO - saying "we only want players who are desperate to be here" plays well with fans but ultimately, you lose by selling them - if you have to fight for them then then that's what you should do. De Gea signed a deal, he can be forced to stay unless he refuses to play etc, then as a last resort you'd be forced to but we hold the cards in this deal.
Real have no great reason to go for him, other than Galactico policy and him being Spanish NT #1. Obviously De Gea is better than Navas but from their perspective, they really don't need to spend 60m+ GBP on a GK. They're already La Liga champions and now back to back CL champions. They're better off spending big money on upgrading on Benzema or another top class CB alongside Ramos.
Because you have to sign players in the future...your ability to attract elite-level players is going to take a hit if you're going to take that much of a hard-line stance.
The least United can do is sell? In what way are we obliged to do so? He was happy to sign a new deal after the last fiasco, so as far as I'm concerned, he can't complain that he is somehow being mistreated.
And the constant talk about him being desperate to go home is nonsense IMO - he didn't have to leave in the first place, he didn't need to sign a new deal and it's ominous to me that he's not pining for his boyhood club but their bitter rivals, who just happen to be the most decorated club in world football, winning 3 CL's in 4 years - IMO it's not about going home but going to a team which will give him a platform for the biggest stages and trophies.
I didn't say the least United can do is sell, but rather negotiate. De Gea has served this club tremendously, if he wants to return home, then United will do the honourable thing and at least consider it - if Real pay up.
I've also not said he's desperate to go, hence why I said the club only face a decision, if De Gea requests a transfer.
I'd love him to stay, but it's only football - careers are short, if his ambition lies elsewhere and he wants live in the same city as his partner, then you can't resent him for wanting to move on.
We can find ourselves another keeper - IF De Gea ask to leave!
Well if you start negotiating then it can only be to sell - the minute we do, he's gone...and I don't get how it's honourable to sell - he's hugely paid and loved by fans...the honourable thing would for De Gea to accept the contract he signed.
But you know what, if he came out out and said Real offer him the best chance of winning trophies and he's sick of fighting for 4th place then I'd respect that but I don't buy this whole living with is partner thing - he's lived here 5 years and 2 years ago signed to stay here longer and she could always live here with flights to Madrid less time away than my daily commute - these are not the actions of a couple desperate to live in the same city. I've said it before but although I'd understand him liking the idea of going home, if it was an 8th place team wanting him, he'd never go - IMO it's mostly about being competitive/being at a better club.
Next 10 years? De Gea is 26, not 21. Navas is 30, by that logic, Navas also has another 6 years left. GKs can have long careers but not many of them stay at a high level at the end of their careers. Buffon and Van Der Sar are exceptions.Except with DeGea, they would be set in the Gk dept. for the next 10 years. Which puts into perspective the 60m+ outlay. Plus, who said they wouldn't spend on an upgrade on Benzema if they went for DeGea. They could easily go for two top class players.
You're looking at it from a different perspective from me, which is fair enough. But I don't agree.
I don't believe in keeping players who've made it clear they want to leave. If De Dea does that, he can move on.
But it'd be a purely human decision. He's held his counsel in recent months and if he wishes to return to his home city (with his partner), the least United can do is look to facilitate that by negotiating with Madrid - despite how little appetite Woodward and Co have for selling to Real.
He's a human being. Not an asset. All you'd be doing is keeping an unhappy, resentful player. And that situation isn't healthy.
If he asks to leave, the club will in all probably, negotiate his departure.
That great man then turned around and sold our best player to them, don't forget. He knew that Ronaldo's heart and ambitions would take him to Madrid eventually. He recognized that Ronaldo had given the club several great seasons, including an additional year even once he had decided that he really wanted to go. It was inevitable, and Ferguson knew it. He extracted a then world record fee and decided that it was time to move on. We found plenty of success post-Ronaldo.Hope Woody clinches his cheeks and repel Madrid's offers with everything he's got. As the great man said, we shouldn't sell them a virus, let alone our best players. The way they always try to get out best players and unload on us their overpaid rejects is disgusting.
But neither ronaldo or messi are no 9, i would have included them in the list the first time itself. Rooney atleast i believe was worldclass yet he breached 20 goal mark only twice in his career, this guy has done it thrice already. This season he scored 29 goals in 30 appearances, sure he doesn't do fancy stuff like ronaldo or a messi nor does he score scorchers but he does his job very well better than most in the league.We clearly have a very different view on world class.
Harry kane is not world class. Go make a thread and I'd bet people will laugh at the notion that kane is world class... If world class by your definition is top 5 in their positon.
Ronaldo/messi/lewandowski/suarez/neymar, they're all head and shoulders and belly above kane
I did say top 5, he isn't top 2 and i have not said he is top 2 either.For me world class is having 2 teams play each other and those 22 players are the world class ones. We'd all have slightly different 22 players so those ones are arguably world class as well. Would Kane get a game if you picked the two teams to face each other? That's the question. For me Kane would not but he's a brilliant goal scorer.