David De Gea

No player takes a paycut to move in his prime. It's easier to say no to a bigger pay rise (i.e. during the last saga where we offered more than Madrid), but actively giving away your own guaranteed money never happens.
 


Rob Dawson saying De Gea isn't pushing for a move.

But he does go on to say:

"There is an acceptance among senior figures at Old Trafford that Real offer a significant pull for a player who grew up in the Spanish capital.

However, they are buoyed by De Gea's decision to stay at United last summer and see no reason why he should not make the same choice this time around."

Other than Marca no one else is pushing the De Gea to leave story. Even Ballague is saying he doesn't want to necessarily leave. I can't see us pushing him out if that is the case.
 
Im sure it has been mentioned previously on here, I wouldnt see the issue in letting him live in madrid (assign him a GK coach there) and let him fly in the day before games.
 
It's all about how desperate Real are to sign him. Desperate enough to pay 70m pounds? I'm not so sure.
 
Phil Jones 79 said:
Im sure it has been mentioned previously on here, I wouldnt see the issue in letting him live in madrid (assign him a GK coach there) and let him fly in the day before games.
Click to expand...
That's impractical, even an insult to the club.
 
Phil Jones 79 said:
Im sure it has been mentioned previously on here, I wouldnt see the issue in letting him live in madrid (assign him a GK coach there) and let him fly in the day before games.
Click to expand...

Yeah that definitely isn't a viable option. I don't think anyone has even done that.
 
I just read Inter and AC are interested in Romero so hopefully David stays as replacing both keepers will be a pain.
 
carvajal said:
The offer to De Gea will be good but probably he will have to lose money(and probably Hazard too)
All what you said It would be fine if we were trying to convince the player but I think that we already passed that point.
Marca don't write covers simply for the sake of it. There is something behind and we all know that nobody respects the contract to talk or not with other clubs,especially since Mou and De Gea share the same agent.
We will see,I am optimistic about getting the player without paying too much but actually we usually sell cheap and buy expensive
Click to expand...
Oh Gosh, we're back at it again.

Yes, they do. They do it repeatedly. They photoshop photos to make Real do better. They write fake articles like Madrid have to pay De Gea this amount of money if the transfer doesn't happen (or was it vice versa). We even discussed it last time around that would have been illegal and so on.

Marca are as reliable as the Daily Mail or Sun.
 
carvajal said:
The offer to De Gea will be good but probably he will have to lose money(and probably Hazard too)
All what you said It would be fine if we were trying to convince the player but I think that we already passed that point.
Marca don't write covers simply for the sake of it. There is something behind and we all know that nobody respects the contract to talk or not with other clubs,especially since Mou and De Gea share the same agent.
We will see,I am optimistic about getting the player without paying too much but actually we usually sell cheap and buy expensive
Click to expand...

De Gea was all over their covers last summer "Imaginary release clause" and so was Pogba
 
Schmiznurf said:
I just read Inter and AC are interested in Romero so hopefully David stays as replacing both keepers will be a pain.
Click to expand...
I'd be happy with replacing him with Pereira, Romero deserves to be starting every week really at the stage of his career he's currently at.

Edit: Edit: Why would AC be after him when they have Donnarumma :confused: unless he's moving to Real?
 
pascell said:
I'd be happy with replacing him with Pereira, Romero deserves to be starting every week really at the stage of his career he's currently at.

Edit: Edit: Why would AC be after him when they have Donnarumma :confused: unless he's moving to Real?
Click to expand...

In the article it said if he joins Milan or Inter, it will be as a back up.
 
carvajal said:
The offer to De Gea will be good but probably he will have to lose money(and probably Hazard too)
All what you said It would be fine if we were trying to convince the player but I think that we already passed that point.
Marca don't write covers simply for the sake of it. There is something behind and we all know that nobody respects the contract to talk or not with other clubs,especially since Mou and De Gea share the same agent.
We will see,I am optimistic about getting the player without paying too much but actually we usually sell cheap and buy expensive
Click to expand...

It was from 2013,

http://www.101greatgoals.com/blog/c...list-of-the-spanish-newspapers-biggest-fails/
 
ovoxo said:
Other than Marca no one else is pushing the De Gea to leave story. Even Ballague is saying he doesn't want to necessarily leave. I can't see us pushing him out if that is the case.
Click to expand...

Its very much the case , Marca are a real madrid propoganda mouthpiece, this is the way they operate in the market for every player forcing the player to rebel and the deal to conclude with a lower price. which dint work with lewy and bale case as lewy bit his teeth in, but stillmadrid offered more than spurs to bale. There is very less chance of a player like de gea to rebel if madrid aint are willing to match the de gea 's salary and willing to sell navas to another club. If madrid comes up with an offer united and de gea are happy with then de gea could be tempted back to change cities and move back to his native place, but unless that is the case Real madrid risk themselves getting blown out of the water again.
 
Last edited:
Revan said:
Oh Gosh, we're back at it again.

Yes, they do. They do it repeatedly. They photoshop photos to make Real do better. They write fake articles like Madrid have to pay De Gea this amount of money if the transfer doesn't happen (or was it vice versa). We even discussed it last time around that would have been illegal and so on.

Marca are as reliable as the Daily Mail or Sun.
Click to expand...

They are trying all summer to dump their want away attacking midfeilder james rod on to us to drive down the de gea price too, a player with a personality mourinho would not like to have in his squad as he has repeatedly called out players who are less hard working.
 
De Gea may leave. He may not.

He is our best player in that he is top 3 in his position in the world.

That said, we do notconcede many goals and losing your goalkeeper is not like losing a star striker.

If he wants to go home, fair enough.

Hazard will not be leaving Chelsea. Why would a millionaire Frenchmen swap London for a little provincial town like Madrid?

He's also about to win the PL.

The idea he would take a pay cut to join anyone is absolutely hilarious.
 
Skills said:
No player takes a paycut to move in his prime. It's easier to say no to a bigger pay rise (i.e. during the last saga where we offered more than Madrid), but actively giving away your own guaranteed money never happens.
Click to expand...
Cesc did it
 
ovoxo said:
Yeah that definitely isn't a viable option. I don't think anyone has even done that.
Click to expand...

I think Bogarde did it at Chelsea once. He commuted from Amsterdam but by that time he'd already been relegated to the reserves and didn't give a feck.
 
Phil Jones 79 said:
Im sure it has been mentioned previously on here, I wouldnt see the issue in letting him live in madrid (assign him a GK coach there) and let him fly in the day before games.
Click to expand...
We can buy Vicente Calderon since Atletico is moving anyway and play our home games there?
 
Vato said:
I wasn't too bothered about signing sausage boy but now I hope we do just so I can laugh at prtk911, who will need to be put on suicide watch when he sees his idol in white.
Click to expand...
I think he'd be wasted in outfield mate to be honest.
 
Hopefully Madrid concentrate on Alli this summer as their main signing.
 
KingMinger22 said:
De Gea may leave. He may not.

He is our best player in that he is top 3 in his position in the world.

That said, we do notconcede many goals and losing your goalkeeper is not like losing a star striker.

If he wants to go home, fair enough.

Hazard will not be leaving Chelsea. Why would a millionaire Frenchmen swap London for a little provincial town like Madrid?

He's also about to win the PL.

The idea he would take a pay cut to join anyone is absolutely hilarious.
Click to expand...

Could of swore he was belgian. :lol:
 
:mad::mad::mad:
Read this on another fanzine, thought it was bullshit. Well Romero will be sold to inter for sure because that was also mentioned in it. I would rather Romero than hart, but the article by duncan paints a picture where de gea will not leave unless Madrid pay 60 million for him. The only problem is hart for me. That would be the most stupid move we could make. I would rather schmichel or even try for ederson(benfica). This would be very stupid to say the least. Hope real dont come after DDG. Hope we can resist them once again until a better option is available.
 
I would genuinely rather keep Romero as number one than Hart
 
Hart has dropped at least 5 clangers leading to goals this season. Bizarre transfer.
 
He'd sign Hart, just out of spite in relation to Pep.. motivating Hart to prove him wrong. Only good thing from Hart's perspective is that Jose don't give two shits about distribution from the back.. so his lack of skills on the ball would not come into question.
 
That'll be a boring summer for Madrid fans if they end up buying a fecking goalkeeper (De Gea, Courtois whoever) for £50-100m.

But yeah Joe Hart would be embarrassing all around if it were to happen.
 
prtk0811 said:
Its not my valuation it's the right valuation, a world star is atleast double of what buffon went for a decade and a half earlier for 53 m euros so 100 m euros is right valuation rather than a subjective one, Spain no 1 , huge marketing potential , on top of his game , does not get better than that.

Should be 2 parties? All 3 , the sellar , the player and the buyer needs to be satisfied with the deal , and if the players are included then theres 4 parties involved in that case. It's not easy ,the transfer negotiaons.

Madrid have not done the deal for de Gea , he's not free to talk to any clubs right now as he's under contract and playing, also Marca is a typical Madrid propoganda mouthpiece as always so there is nothing in it.

De Gea would be foolish enough to half his wages and also have navas competition stay at madrid while he moves, de Gea and navas both need to be walking into the world cups on the back of game time to be the respective no1 for the respective countries ,so it's video gamish to think Madrid can retain both with a world star like de Gea taking such a huge pay cut specially when he is in for an another pay rise this year which will make him world's best paid keeper and he deserves every bit of it because of his performances for club and country. Penny pinching attitude by Madrid won't help their causes one bit , he is no1 of the world's biggest club and certainly a bigger star than many in madrid squad. Real have to put forward an offer which is acceptable to all parties or simply go for a player they can afford on the market.
Click to expand...


His valuation... how cute :lol:
 
Please no. I have been mocking Hart for years so I'll be forced to be a hypocrite when he joins us. :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.