Fracture90
Full Member
Mikhi, Isco, Martial
Rashford
Pretty much every player would interchange.
Looks pretty sweet.
Rashford
Pretty much every player would interchange.
Looks pretty sweet.
You can eat soup easier with a plastic spoon than with a silver fork but you know which one is worth more. Or don't you?
You can eat soup easier with a plastic spoon than with a silver fork but you know which one is worth more. Or don't you?
I hope that Mourinho and the board have such esteem in Herrera and not so much in Isco or Morata ... Danilo is definitely a better right back than Isco, in case that you need someone for that position
We don't need an Isco and if we did want to pursue that sort of player there are better options which would probably cost less ala Silva. Herrera is invaluable to us, there isn't another player in the squad who can do what he does with so much energy, in fact there isn't many players around who can play that role to such a standard all season long.
If you were to ask me for example, there's no chance I'd swap Herrera for Isco, even though Isco is the better player.
even though he's the better player.
Sure you'd love United to take Danilo, and James off your hands, whilst handing you DDG in exchange, we're daft at times, but not that daft....hopefully!
I hope that Mourinho and the board have such esteem in Herrera and not so much in Isco or Morata ... Danilo is definitely a better right back than Isco, in case that you need someone for that position
How far is De Gea up your personal list of priorities? Reckon Perez will go all out for him?
That's what I mean, I reckon he means way more to United than he would to Madrid so our valuations are likely to be very different.If only they are willing to match his wages, and our asking price.
That's what I mean, I reckon he means way more to United than he would to Madrid so our valuations are likely to be very different.
I know they're different kind of midfielders but surely you aren't implying Herrera is the better player?
Don't let it be Joe Hart, as some of the papers are saying. he's nowhere near good enough. I'd go for Jack Butland
How far is De Gea up your personal list of priorities? Reckon Perez will go all out for him?
Yes we mustn't sell him on the cheap just cos RM have no real needNot because I'm biased, but I really do think DDG is the best GK in the world. Neuer is world class but he had nowhere near the work DDG had in past years.
So you wouldn't want to see them pay anything above £60m? That's fair. I could see us selling for that if the player really pushes for the move.Personally I find it very difficult to value goalkeepers and defensive midfielders who do not play the ball well, and that will not change, but assuming the club wants to change the goalkeeper, then I want the best.
From what I've heard Madrid wants to pay 70/75 and if it is not possible, then to look for another option. I don´t like the option of Courtois since would be equally expensive.
My first option is De Gea because he is Spanish and because I think that two years ago Madrid behaved badly with him.
I do not like the idea of including players. If Mourinho wants Morata, Casemiro or James then I prefer an independent offer.
My limit would be 75 million euros, reaching 80/85 with additions in the contract for winning the league, champions, etc.
Beyond that I would look for a young goalkeeper, keeping Navas as second goalkeeper.
Yes, I think that De Gea is the priority for Florentino
I say that because you include three players. In my opinion Kovacic could be worth 40 million euros(or more) and Varane about 30, so I wonder how much you value Isco to calculate how much David would be worth.
I was talking generally in today's market.What's worth more is subjective. Isco wouldn't be worth more to our team than Herrera, even though he's the better player.
We would be a laughing stock if we took Citys cast off for our main goalkeeper. Butland may be a good shout, but also a gamble so dont think it will happenDon't let it be Joe Hart, as some of the papers are saying. he's nowhere near good enough. I'd go for Jack Butland
gamble? I think he might be the next England keeper; if southgate ever works out that Hart is a liabiltyWe would be a laughing stock if we took Citys cast off for our main goalkeeper. Butland may be a good shout, but also a gamble so dont think it will happen
Personally I find it very difficult to value goalkeepers and defensive midfielders who do not play the ball well, and that will not change, but assuming the club wants to change the goalkeeper, then I want the best.
From what I've heard Madrid wants to pay 70/75 and if it is not possible, then to look for another option. I don´t like the option of Courtois since would be equally expensive.
My first option is De Gea because he is Spanish and because I think that two years ago Madrid behaved badly with him.
I do not like the idea of including players. If Mourinho wants Morata, Casemiro or James then I prefer an independent offer.
My limit would be 75 million euros, reaching 80/85 with additions in the contract for winning the league, champions, etc.
Beyond that I would look for a young goalkeeper, keeping Navas as second goalkeeper.
Yes, I think that De Gea is the priority for Florentino
So you wouldn't want to see them pay anything above £60m? That's fair. I could see us selling for that if the player really pushes for the move.
I know all our fans want to see us play hardball and I can see why, I'm just saying I could see him going for that.You kidding? This is exactly what's wrong with this club if that happens. Madrid aint short of money, they are short on intent and penny pinching forcing the player to rebel , and that's the way to deflate the price. We dont need 60 m , not at all . he is atleast 15 - 20 m euros short on the current valuation for a 26 year old. 2 years before the it would have made sense , but de gea have developed more technically since 2 years and is even a better keeper.
70 m pounds is the minimumvaluation up front. absolute minimum and we should bite in if that is not met, We can really afford squeeze out a year out of him in the current contract and keep him for another year till we get our man.
It's not hard ball at all it's completely fair valuation, we are not doing charity here , buisness has to done as pure buisness in a professional way. We are fair with our in comming buisness it only seems right we are also that way in outgoing buisness.I know all our fans want to see us play hardball and I can see why, I'm just saying I could see him going for that.
It's not hard ball at all it's completely fair valuation, we are not doing charity here , buisness has to done as pure buisness in a professional way. We are fair with our in comming buisness it only seems right we are also that way in outgoing buisness.I know all our fans want to see us play hardball and I can see why, I'm just saying I could see him going for that.
It's the same thing. Most teams who play hardball would say exactly the same. When Spurs sold Bale they were only securing what they thought he was worth.It's not hard ball at all it's completely fair valuation, we are not doing charity here , buisness has to done as pure buisness in a professional way. We are fair with our in comming buisness it only seems right we are also that way in outgoing buisness.
I don´t see why is at least 15-20m euros short when he would be the most expensive keeper ever. That is your valuation of the market, totally subjective.You kidding? This is exactly what's wrong with this club if that happens. Madrid aint short of money, they are short on intent and penny pinching forcing the player to rebel , and that's the way to deflate the price. We dont need 60 m , not at all . he is atleast 15 - 20 m euros short on the current valuation for a 26 year old. 2 years before the it would have made sense , but de gea have developed more technically since 2 years and is even a better keeper.
70 m pounds is the minimumvaluation up front. absolute minimum and we should bite in if that is not met, We can really afford squeeze out a year out of him in the current contract and keep him for another year till we get our man.
6 Real have to match de gea's current or upgraded wages on offer
You need to realize he's your best or second best player and is paid acordingly, but for Madrid he's just a keeper upgrade.
They wont match his wages and make him 3rd highest paid player because there's a locker room full of stars and champions who make far less then De Gea does at the moment.
It would create chaos in the locker room. No player is worth it.
He'll have to taka a big pay cut to come to Madrid.
Come to 2017, Any top keeper we will be paying 50+m... so why not ask 80m for the best who is 26 and will be at the top for next 10 years. Just because we have De Gea, some are underestimating the importance of goalkeeper.I really doubt we will get 80 mill for a GK,60 maybe.
Good luck with that. I hope your club too has the same attitude.You need to realize he's your best or second best player and is paid acordingly, but for Madrid he's just a keeper upgrade.
They wont match his wages and make him 3rd highest paid player because there's a locker room full of stars and champions who make far less then De Gea does at the moment.
It would create chaos in the locker room. No player is worth it.
He'll have to taka a big pay cut to come to Madrid.
Its not my valuation it's the right valuation, a world star is atleast double of what buffon went for a decade and a half earlier for 53 m euros so 100 m euros is right valuation rather than a subjective one, Spain no 1 , huge marketing potential , on top of his game , does not get better than that.I don´t see why is at least 15-20m euros short when he would be the most expensive keeper ever. That is your valuation of the market, totally subjective.
In the other post you say in the 4th point that " a transfer to take place wants all 3 or 4 parties to be satisfied". It should be 2 parties. In the other case you create an interrelation between the professional careers of 2 different players.
De Gea´s future shouldn´t be conected with Kroos future (unless you convince him to leave). 2 players+money=a player is for video games.
About the 6th point, I read that Madrid have a deal with De Gea.Probably will be a generous offer but we don´t have to match anything and he will have to accept the competence if it´s the case. If he doesn´t like the offer he can stay in England.
Anyway, with Florentino you never know...so maybe you are right.
The offer to De Gea will be good but probably he will have to lose money(and probably Hazard too)Its not my valuation it's the right valuation, a world star is atleast double of what buffon went for a decade and a half earlier for 53 m euros so 100 m euros is right valuation rather than a subjective one, Spain no 1 , huge marketing potential , on top of his game , does not get better than that.
Should be 2 parties? All 3 , the sellar , the player and the buyer needs to be satisfied with the deal , and if the players are included then theres 4 parties involved in that case. It's not easy ,the transfer negotiaons.
Madrid have not done the deal for de Gea , he's not free to talk to any clubs right now as he's under contract and playing, also Marca is a typical Madrid propoganda mouthpiece as always so there is nothing in it.
De Gea would be foolish enough to half his wages and also have navas competition stay at madrid while he moves, de Gea and navas both need to be walking into the world cups on the back of game time to be the respective no1 for the respective countries ,so it's video gamish to think Madrid can retain both with a world star like de Gea taking such a huge pay cut specially when he is in for an another pay rise this year which will make him world's best paid keeper and he deserves every bit of it because of his performances for club and country. Penny pinching attitude by Madrid won't help their causes one bit , he is no1 of the world's biggest club and certainly a bigger star than many in madrid squad. Real have to put forward an offer which is acceptable to all parties or simply go for a player they can afford on the market.
hazard and de Gea and Marca an huge pay cuts.The offer to De Gea will be good but probably he will have to lose money(and probably Hazard too)
All what you said It would be fine if we were trying to convince the player but I think that we already passed that point.
Marca don't write covers simply for the sake of it. There is something behind and we all know that nobody respects the contract to talk or not with other clubs,especially since Mou and De Gea share the same agent.
We will see,I am optimistic about getting the player without paying too much but actually we usually sell cheap and buy expensive