If I do not understand the game, after reading this thread, I would have thought the 1st skillset a goalkeeper should have is his distribution rather than stopping shots into the net.
1st row is DDG's stats from this game, and then Ederson's season stats. Ederson is the best keeper with the ball in the world.
Short pass attempt Short successful Short % Medium attempt Medium successful Medium % Long attempt Long successful Long % 3 3 100 13 13 100 14 24 58 185 187 98.9 471 476 98.9 220 353 62.3
With one exception, all the frequent posters in this thread are purely agenda-driven and their posts are a waste of space
???I didn't criticise his pass percentage
he gave the ball away every time he passed it long.
Ten Hag made changes in the second half and Martinez dropped right next to him to aid the build up.
I can't remember bringing Ederson up but he's clearly better than De Gea on the ball.
What those stats don't show you is the quality of long balls though. Ederson hits it flat, fast and very long. De Gea hits it slow, floaty and barely gets passed the half way line.
It makes a massive difference when the long balls are accurate into the last third, genuine pick outs not just pumps into midfield hoping for the best.
so true. Some strange posts on here.If I do not understand the game, after reading this thread, I would have thought the 1st skillset a goalkeeper should have is his distribution rather than stopping shots into the net.
It's not about De Gea's pass percentage but rather about building the play effectively through the defensive third.???
this wouldn't affect DDG's long passing percentage at all. and he had 3 short passes all game.
Agreed. And yet yesterday their passing stats were identical while the usual posters were pointing DDG out as the main culprit for the first half. So either his passing yesterday was mucch better than you thought, or Ederson is another dinosaur.
If you pump it long hoping for the best, you don't connect more than half the time, which he did. Especially since the opposition outnumbers the players you are trying to pick out.
Pep & Arteta both bought goalkeepers with fairly average shot stopping abilities, on the basis of their other strengths, so it makes sense to some managers. The rationale is that a good team doesn't concede that many chances. Last season Ederson only faced 83 shots on target in the entire league season, which is slightly over 2 per game. So the value of a keeper that can be above average at shot stopping is limited. On the other hand, City probably build out from the back 5 to 10 times a game, so they get a lot of value from someone good at that. Its a case of matching the keeper's strengths to the team's strengths.
The scale of the difference between shot stoppers is often misunderstood anyway. While there are always a couple of keepers who have blinders in any given season, most of the time the difference between an excellent shot stopper and a bang average shot-stopper is only 3 or 4 goals over the entire season. So even the better keepers are only saving 1 extra goal every 10 games or so. The margins are finer than people often think at the highest level.
Pep & Arteta both bought goalkeepers with fairly average shot stopping abilities, on the basis of their other strengths, so it makes sense to some managers. The rationale is that a good team doesn't concede that many chances. Last season Ederson only faced 83 shots on target in the entire league season, which is slightly over 2 per game. So the value of a keeper that can be above average at shot stopping is limited. On the other hand, City probably build out from the back 5 to 10 times a game, so they get a lot of value from someone good at that. Its a case of matching the keeper's strengths to the team's strengths.
The scale of the difference between shot stoppers is often misunderstood anyway. While there are always a couple of keepers who have blinders in any given season, most of the time the difference between an excellent shot stopper and a bang average shot-stopper is only 3 or 4 goals over the entire season. So even the better keepers are only saving 1 extra goal every 10 games or so. The margins are finer than people often think at the highest level.
Good post, though I do think De Gea makes saves that a lot of good keepers just don't, so it might be more than 3-4 in his case over his 45 games a year or so, maybe more like 5-6 if you figure he makes one save every 9 games or so he plays, which feels reasonable.
I imagine Ten Hag is conflicted and probably hasn't made a decision yet, unless we've tapped up Raya.
Might be a money decision. New owners and big budget means Ten Hag can get his ideal replacement (as long as they aren't already at a top 15 club or so in the world), and smaller budget and maybe De Gea signs a 2+1 and Ten Hag puts off the decision until next year but we bring in the best young keeper we can find for 10-15M. There were rumours of an MLS 23 year old Serbian this week, maybe something like that. Obviously Leipzig have already moved faster than us and signed the young highly-rated Belgian for 10M.
I was happy enough with him yesterday, thought it was a good game that showed some of the improvements he has made this season.
I will first say that @Oranges038 is correct in terms of his initial positioning being poor for both of his first half saves; he drops too far for the Barnes clean through chance and he is beyond his front post for the cross for Iheanacho header. By extension he's correct in saying that De Gea makes more difficult stops than other goalkeepers would, particularly the second one, but ultimately he does stop them which is the critical part.
They are great saves. But if you really look at it.
On the first. He started high and dropped all the way into his 6 then came forward again. If he didn't drop so much he come forward and can close it down and make a block just like Ward did to Weghorst in the second.
On the second one, he's too far beyond the near post when the cross comes in. Better positioned and he can either just claim the cross and or the back post save becomes an easy collection. It's a fantastic save, but he's made it harder for himself than it needs to be with his positioning.
But lets just continue to pretend he's the only keeper in the world who could deal with both those situations. He's probably the only one that makes them as difficult as that to deal with.
Yeah he just doesn't drop anticipating a shot from Iheanacho, because it's never on and he can see that, maybe a long range shot from Barnes although he then drops a further couple of paces while Iheanacho is on the ball and playing it to Barnes as such by the time Barnes gets the ball he's made three steps inside his six yard box, if he held his position on the six yard line and makes the three steps forward he made while Barnes is readying himself to shoot it's an easier stop to make - it doesn't make it any less of an impressive stop. It's particularly odd that you cut the part where I praised him for making the save and the significant improvement in that part of his game vs last season; "However, last season he would have held his position once Barnes went clean through, we saw it a number of times, however here he took two or three quick steps forward and made Barnes take the shot early leading to him making the save. Much more aggressive goalkeeping and a huge improvement IMO".He drops because he's anticipating a shot from the very left footed Ian Nacho from outside the area. If he keeps coming forward and the shot comes in he would be in a horrible position (and would also be in a position where he could very easily be lobbed)
On the second, he's beyond the near post because, if the ball comes low and hard to his left, he needs to be able to turn it around the post - not into his own goal.
He drops because he's anticipating a shot from the very left footed Ian Nacho from outside the area. If he keeps coming forward and the shot comes in he would be in a horrible position (and would also be in a position where he could very easily be lobbed)
On the second, he's beyond the near post because, if the ball comes low and hard to his left, he needs to be able to turn it around the post - not into his own goal.
Obviously. Some fans really struggle to see the full picture.Would still have both Courtois and Alisson every day of the week.
Some of you lot are going to be a bit mystified at the levels of improvement we will see when we get an actual quality goalkeeper.
We've already seen it when Romero and Henderson had decent runs in the team and they are bang average.
They are great saves. But if you really look at it.
On the first. He started high and dropped all the way into his 6 then came forward again. If he didn't drop so much he come forward and can close it down and make a block just like Ward did to Weghorst in the second.
On the second one, he's too far beyond the near post when the cross comes in. Better positioned and he can either just claim the cross and or the back post save becomes an easy collection. It's a fantastic save, but he's made it harder for himself than it needs to be with his positioning.
But lets just continue to pretend he's the only keeper in the world who could deal with both those situations. He's probably the only one that makes them as difficult as that to deal with.
A thread on not closing down the attacker to early the opposite of what you said
A thread on not closing down the attacker to early the opposite of what you said
Specifically the opposite.
In general there's plenty of reason to criticise De Gea but doing so in relation to that Leicester game in particular would be beyond odd. Fully agree with the argument that he should be replaced but that shouldn't require people to be critical after actual excellent games.
Specifically the opposite.
In general there's plenty of reason to criticise De Gea but doing so in relation to that Leicester game in particular would be beyond odd. Fully agree with the argument that he should be replaced but that shouldn't require people to be critical after actual excellent games.
A thread on not closing down the attacker to early the opposite of what you said
Specifically the opposite.
In general there's plenty of reason to criticise De Gea but doing so in relation to that Leicester game in particular would be beyond odd. Fully agree with the argument that he should be replaced but that shouldn't require people to be critical after actual excellent games.
I mean they aren't. People swear by this guy and how he grades keepers and hes specifically praising de gea sitting back and waiting yet you still can't just sya great save without some caveatEntirely different situations though.
Did you read the post I quoted? Oranges said de gea should have closed him down a lot earlier a blocked the shot ie "too early" which is what happened allison last night.
Oranges wanted de gea to do exactly what alison done, the opposite of what he should do.
Oh my bad. Thought you were disagreeing ha.I know, I was agreeing with you.
Yes, under Hoek he spent much more time training as part of the team and he did get better of those elements of his game. Sadly after Hoek left we allowed him to pick his own coach and Alvarez came in and he pretty much regressed overnight back to the goal-line type of goalkeeper. Ten Hag will definitely have him spending much more time training with the team rather than alone and it's clearly benefitting his game.It's also worth noting he's clearly improving in coming off his line for balls over the top and punching crosses. His ball play is better.
It's amazing what good coaches can do. Has de gea not been told to do any of this under previous regimes?
I don't think that's the case. Most people still understand that goalkeepers mistakes happen. The problem with De Gea is his lack of pro-activeness that is evident, well documented and clear to see for all.I completely understand if some or many of the people here believe that we can do better than De Gea. But the amount of mental gymnastics done to prove an undeniably great performance as some sort of a fluke or even a problem of his own creation is quite ridiculous.
We look at some of the best keepers in the world in Ederson, Courtois and Allison and they are making some pretty damn blatant mistakes. Ederson has conceded a goal from the first shot in target in each of his last 4 games. People have visualised a mythical keeper who is a great passer and routinely pulls off spectacular saves and has no mistakes in them. And it would be a rude awakening once we actually get a new name in.
I think you are overrating De Gea shot stopping ability here. He is a good shotstopper but not a top in that regard, hasn't been for a few years.Yes, we could get a keeper who is better aerially or is a better passer than De Gea. But saving shots like the Iheanacho header is something very few keepers will pull off and it’s a quality which is easy to dismiss but almost impossible to replace. And we’ll only find it out the hard way.