David de Gea image 1

David de Gea Spain flag

2022-23 Performances


View full 2022-23 profile

6.2 Season Average Rating
Appearances
58
Clean sheets
25
Goals
0
Assists
0
Yellow cards
2
Status
Not open for further replies.
Let see then, how much we'd spent on Gk.

Did Guardiola win anything the season he replace Hart, or was it after he upgraded several other payers? Guardiola upgraded Joe Hart with a worse Gk that he eventually replaced also.
Bravo is irrelevant in the conversation though. He dropped Hart & played Caballero because he was a better fit for the team. Who he signed after that isn’t thr point; one of the first things he did was change the goalkeeper because he wasn’t suited to how he wanted his team to play. That’s where we are at.

And while they didn’t win anything they conceded less goals, gained 12 more points & finished higher in the table. Despite having a supposedly worse goalkeeper.
 
I see the cringelord De Gea haters are out in full force again.

Neither goal was on De Gea, nor was the collapse of our midfield play on De Gea. The aspects of his play that are not at the level of peak Allison (which no longer exists) are there for all to see, but Dave did job tonight and was far, very far, from being our weak link.

Funny how they become mutes when he has a good game, anything other than a clean sheet or a win and he is automatically at fault for our finishing, our build up in midfield and the goalkeeping,
 
Funny how they become mutes when he has a good game, anything other than a clean sheet or a win and he is automatically at fault for our finishing, our build up in midfield and the goalkeeping,
Another convenient straw man that completely ignores the actual discussion in here and the legitimate criticisms that are made. I hope you stay in the newbies.
 
Another convenient straw man that completely ignores the actual discussion in here and the legitimate criticisms that are made. I hope you stay in the newbies.
Its so bizarre and you dont really see it this much in other threads. Like who has become 'mute' when DDG has a good game? There is no evidence of that at all, but its thrown out there as its the only way to deflect from actual constructive criticism.
 
Probably, but you can't complain about an offside there when your player does something stupid like that in the box.
What I will complain about is earlier they gave an offside against Casemiro when a) he didn't look offside and b) he didn't touch the ball, nor was any Spurs player anywhere near the ball. Stopped us getting a corner and sustaining an attack.
 
We will never be able to control possession with a keeper who just hoofs it at the slightest sign of pressure. Who were our targets today? Rashford? Martial? Neither are particularly good aerially. The opponent just cleans up the loose ball and launches another attack. De Gea needs to be a 2nd choice keeper, he's not good enough.
This. I lost count how many possessions were handed by him in the second half. Our opponents know it (exploiting his weakness), opposition fans know it (celebrate when he gets the ball), our own players know it (even Shaw was frustrated with his passing option), only our fans refuse to accept it.
 
If De Gea stays you can bet that Martinez and Varane or who so ever is in defense would eventually turn shit next season like all before them and some would still be wondering what are we doing wrong .
 
I see the cringelord De Gea haters are out in full force again.

Neither goal was on De Gea, nor was the collapse of our midfield play on De Gea. The aspects of his play that are not at the level of peak Allison (which no longer exists) are there for all to see, but Dave did job tonight and was far, very far, from being our weak link.
If you think that current Alisson is below the level of peak Alisson, God knows how far below the level of peak Alisson you think current De Gea is. Even current Alisson (who, to be fair, is still the world's best keeper in my view) is lightyears ahead of current De Gea.

I actually somewhat see the sense in some of your post. I do think people are looking for reasons to blame De Gea for the goals. That isn't the point of my criticism of him, though. We need to be going beyond just having a goalkeeper who makes some good saves and isn't always directly to blame for conceding goals if we want to start challenging for the league.

We're not going to put together those consistent winning runs, especially away from home, until we start drastically improving our ability to play against pressure. And whilst Dave isn't the only problem here, he sure as shit as one of them.
 
I do feel that his time at the club should come to an end. He's been great but I feel need a more well rounded goalkeeper. Still an amazing shot stopper but lacks in key other areas needed to get us to the next level.
.
 
We challenge for the second ball, not the first. Half of Ederson‘s long balls go to the other team, or more than half. As I said, this thread is ridiculous.

I will rewatch the first goal since I missed it.

Okay, but no top team has a main tactic of challenging for the second ball, from GK punts.

It gets used sparingly because top teams like to control the first phase of possesion.

So yes there will always be times when it goes long and we scrap for second balls it's part and parcel.

But we spent the entire second half up until spurs equalised going long, every goal kick Everytime it went back to De Gea it got punted. Yet we weren't winning any aerial duels and we were losing most of the second balls, so why on earth would we do that to ourselves.

Second goal is a case in point, there were
Short options available, our shape was all over the place, and De Gea wasn't even under that much pressure when the ball went back to him. Just keep the ball give ourselves time to get back in shape and relieve the pressure. It's what every other top team would do apart from us, and I wonder why.
 
Whether he will be a first choice goalkeeper for next season will tell us a lot about the state of the club. I can't imagine people actually believe this is the GK Erik wants/is happy with (forget the wages). But it might be we have bigger issues and we just can't replace De Gea - what would be very disappointing.

The way he still plays like a little boy (being the most senior player in the squad) is the reason I want him gone.
 
Whether he will be a first choice goalkeeper for next season will tell us a lot about the state of the club. I can't imagine people actually believe this is the GK Erik wants/is happy with (forget the wages). But it might be we have bigger issues and we just can't replace De Gea - what would be very disappointing.

The way he still plays like a little boy (being the most senior player in the squad) is the reason I want him gone.

We’ve been doing this “we’ve got more important issues to address” thing for years now. Personally I think a new gk is the absolute top priority, even ahead of a CF.
 
Bravo is irrelevant in the conversation though. He dropped Hart & played Caballero because he was a better fit for the team. Who he signed after that isn’t thr point; one of the first things he did was change the goalkeeper because he wasn’t suited to how he wanted his team to play. That’s where we are at.

And while they didn’t win anything they conceded less goals, gained 12 more points & finished higher in the table. Despite having a supposedly worse goalkeeper.

Can't understand why people can't see this.
 
What gets me about stuff like this is how do the Club not look at it, especially a guy like Ten Haag. I really hoped he'd be the one to show the Glazers you can spend less money while running the club more efficiently.

Where does he rank in expected saves?
 
Not only is his passing ability poor, his kick is also quite weak. Spurs' second goal is partly due him not kicking long enough. Get rid.
 
Not a problem when that happens deep in the opposition half. A problem when it happens at the half way line. See the second goal tonight. His inability to get any length on “long” clearances is annoying.

This. I lost count how many possessions were handed by him in the second half. Our opponents know it (exploiting his weakness), opposition fans know it (celebrate when he gets the ball), our own players know it (even Shaw was frustrated with his passing option), only our fans refuse to accept it.

Not only is his passing ability poor, his kick is also quite weak. Spurs' second goal is partly due him not kicking long enough. Get rid.

The biggest issue is how he cant even get distance on the ones hes clearing. Either clear it fully (even if you have to put it out for a throw) or put it really wide. He does the floaty one almost always through the middle

 
The biggest issue is how he cant even get distance on the ones hes clearing. Either clear it fully (even if you have to put it out for a throw) or put it really wide. He does the floaty one almost always through the middle



Every time he kicked it long I was saying to my son "straight to a Spurs player" at the moment he kicked it and sure enough, every time...

It doesn't help that whoever we have up front is consistently terrible in the air but it's hard to win a header from weak, floaty clearances like that when defenders get a run at you.
 


So let me just see if I have this right...

Our goalkeeper....

- is weak at claiming low crosses into his 6-yard box, but its OK because he occasionally makes a decent save

- is weak at sweeping balls in behind the back four, but its OK because he occasionally makes a decent save

- is weak at saving one vs ones, but its OK because he occasionally makes a decent save

- is weak at saving penalties, but its OK because he occasionally makes a decent save

- is weak in possession, but its OK because he occasionally makes a decent save

- is weak at claiming high crosses and at set-pieces in particular, but its OK because he occasionally makes a decent save

I dispute he's even any good at shot stopping now, I genuinely think (and maybe i'll get stick for this) that he is the weakest all-round GK in the league. If we give him a new contract, thats a serious step backwards for me in the ETH era.
 
Whilst I agree with the criticisms, I’d also like to highlight our inability to compete for those kick outs, some of the players barely tried
 
So let me just see if I have this right...

Our goalkeeper....

- is weak at claiming low crosses into his 6-yard box, but its OK because he occasionally makes a decent save

- is weak at sweeping balls in behind the back four, but its OK because he occasionally makes a decent save

- is weak at saving one vs ones, but its OK because he occasionally makes a decent save

- is weak at saving penalties, but its OK because he occasionally makes a decent save

- is weak in possession, but its OK because he occasionally makes a decent save

- is weak at claiming high crosses and at set-pieces in particular, but its OK because he occasionally makes a decent save

I dispute he's even any good at shot stopping now, I genuinely think (and maybe i'll get stick for this) that he is the weakest all-round GK in the league. If we give him a new contract, thats a serious step backwards for me in the ETH era.
He specialises on ONE of the required keeping attributes of modern keepers and is no longer great at that. His wages make it hard to replace him.
 
He specialises on ONE of the required keeping attributes of modern keepers and is no longer great at that. His wages make it hard to replace him.

Luckily he's out of contract in the summer.

This is one of my biggest peeves. We are so far back that it invites pressure and we end up conceding.

As Peter Schemiechel said, the further you keep the opposition from your goal the less chance they have to score and the less you need to do as a keeper. That was his approach to keeping in the 90s, keep your defence pushed up and you have less to do overall. 30 years later have people who still think do the opposite is a good idea.

Secondly, pushing your defence higher means that when you win the ball back higher it's easier to transition to the attacking phase and outnumber the opposition quicker, meaning you will have a greater chance of scoring goals from there. Something you can't do when your keeper sucks you back to defending on your 18 yard box.

That stat about goals conceded inside the 6 yard box is a joke. I'd rather concede from 30 yards than 3 or 4.

Whilst I agree with the criticisms, I’d also like to highlight our inability to compete for those kick outs, some of the players barely tried

That is something that really pisses me off too. The ball out that the Spurs player headed forward that led to the second goal, Rashford can win that header if he actually tries.
 
This is one of my biggest peeves. We are so far back that it invites pressure and we end up conceding.
Yeah, the defensive line height is horrid. There's a few things we need to do to become a more 'modern' side in the bigger games and tricky away matches, and our inability to play higher up the field is one of the bigger problems.
 
such a strange situation where he either attempts to pass it and causes chaos in the defence, or attempts to hoof it to an attacking group who don’t like physically competing for the ball (except Antony)
 
That is something that really pisses me off too. The ball out that the Spurs player headed forward that led to the second goal, Rashford can win that header if he actually tries.

This is just a consequence of the modern game. Time was that many attackers built their careers on the ability to be at least as physical as defenders. But as skill and speed has increasingly replaced strength in attack, the natural upshot is that defenders get the upper hand in aerial battles.

If you fill your team with players that can give you control of possession - which is still the correct priority as far as Im concerned - you just have to accept that your attackers will struggle in a physical battle against opposition defenders. So what you do is avoid playing too many long balls in the first place unless your player is free.
 
I know it shouldn't be like that but Ten Hag should tell him to just kick it as far away as possible. He keeps trying to get the ball to someone and he's giving it away in the worse possible positions.
 
I know it shouldn't be like that but Ten Hag should tell him to just kick it as far away as possible. He keeps trying to get the ball to someone and he's giving it away in the worse possible positions.

Ten Hag should replace him and not give him a new contract if he is serious about his playstyle. Otherwise, we are just papering over the cracks as usual.
 
If we didn't renew his contract this summer, do we think there would be much of a market for him on a free? I really don't think there are many clubs (especially those wanting to compete for top honours) that would be in a big rush to sign him, which says a lot.
 
If we didn't renew his contract this summer, do we think there would be much of a market for him on a free? I really don't think there are many clubs (especially those wanting to compete for top honours) that would be in a big rush to sign him, which says a lot.
Certainly not at the wages he wants. He'll regret having turned down our stupid 200k/week offer if that's true.
 
Ten Hag should replace him and not give him a new contract if he is serious about his playstyle. Otherwise, we are just papering over the cracks as usual.
Not even papering over cracks. He is one of the biggest cracks in the team and quite often you can trace our goals conceded to something he did poorly.

Though given our need at CF, might not be doable to make a big GK signing as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.