Who else remembers those first few months of his first season where he looked absolutely quality ?
I think it's
nonsense.
I remember those games. Do you? His first game was a 1-0 with Spurs. He has done nothing in attack at all. Looked awful with the ball, his passes always were back or to the nearest players, crossed lacked any quality. It was an awful, dull game and Darmian never looked even like a good full back. He also made a positional mistake in defence, when he could not hold the line and allowed Eriksen (i think) to have Spurs best chance of the game.
Then was the the Villa game, again 1-0 win. There he had some good clearances when we were defending deep in the second half, but truth to be told most of fans, i believe, certainly me, don't think Darmian is a bad defensive player. For example if he played in a Walker's England role in a formation with 3 back, he could have done really good. It's just it's a very special position, seldom used and it's not something you want from a MU full back. So all his good points in Villa game were strictly defensive, basically the way we defended, he was playing RCB, not RB. As for attack Darmian was as shit as he was in the first game. His contribution in opposition's half was literally nil. All others games were the same. He was decently good against Liverpool, but so were almost everyone else, we had a good game, but in that good game Darmian still did not play exceptionally well, or even above MU average.
In fact his issues in attack persisted even in good games and ultimately led to him being a cover option.
I remember exactly he had exactly one really good game for United in terms of attack. I don't remember against who, but he was playing on the left side. And did make a few great crosses etc.